<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CATASTROPHIC PROBABILITY THEORY.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/catastrophic-probability-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/catastrophic-probability-theory/</link>
	<description>Intelligence at the core of humanism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst. &#171; Some of Patrice Ayme&#8217;s Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/catastrophic-probability-theory/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Worst. &#171; Some of Patrice Ayme&#8217;s Thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/catastrophic-probability-theory/#comment-1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I have advocated the catastrophic calculus instead of the usage of probability on important matters. This is very practical, and the applications go from Pakistan, to building codes, to the so called &quot;climate change&quot; (where &quot;The Economist&quot; just adopted the same exact reasoning in its lead editorial) to what the French state and law call the &quot;Principle of Precaution&quot;. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have advocated the catastrophic calculus instead of the usage of probability on important matters. This is very practical, and the applications go from Pakistan, to building codes, to the so called &quot;climate change&quot; (where &quot;The Economist&quot; just adopted the same exact reasoning in its lead editorial) to what the French state and law call the &quot;Principle of Precaution&quot;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
