So I propose to institutionalize the reality we depend upon. A Truth System, separated and equal to the Justice System, the Legislative, or the Executive, not just a Commission.

Of course, in practice one could start with a Commmission, just like the Euro was started as a plutocratic system, not a full democratic currency. (But, precisely, as one can see, with the Euro, there is a danger that one gets stuck with a half baked good, not edible, and ready to rot…)
PA

So the Truth System could advise, counsel the National Assembly (“Congress”), or the existing Justice System that a violation of Truth is happening. One does not want to do as in the USA where a zillion of armed enforcement agencies (DEA, ATF, FBI, and countless acronyms I forgot, more or less shooting at each other, at least verbally).
The idea is to hitch a ride on existing systems, such as academia as much as possible. Peer review would be universal, modulo the Internet (so strenuous, plausible objections would get priority as minority opinions, if they make somehow sense). In science too, “truth” is long in coming, often, and sometimes, the theater of multi century, or multi millennial controversies.
PA

If Governments were truly ‘of the people, for the people, by the people’ freedoms would be moderated by those laws of the State that were in the interests of the common peoples. But, alas, that seems to be a wistful dream just now.

While the detail of a Truth Commission would offer many challenges in turning it into a democratic reality, the idea is one that has much potential and merit.

However, at the risk of being pedantic, I think you mean ‘judiciary’ rather than ‘justice’ and, unless I am misunderstanding what you art trying to say (because I am not familiar with the history) ‘abrogated’ rather than ‘attributed’?

In France the controls are extremely strict. TV, radio and media exposure is strenously controlled by an independent agency. Just after the end of his presidential immunity, a massive descent of judges, bailiffs and police was made on ex-president Sarkozy’s homes, offices, files and computers. He is suspected to have received plutocratic contributions of the order of… $200,000 . Yes, much less than a million dollars.

If confirmed, there is no doubt Sarkozy will go to trial, and then, probably, jail. Obama uses the presidential plane and go sleep with the Silicon Valley plutocrats, to raise millions a day, and has been doing that for months. In France, when Sarkozy started to go around with the presidential planes, he was asked, by the powers that be, such as the Electoral Commission, the Conseil D’Etat (no equivalent in the USA, the state legal counsel, and protector of citizens in their interaction with the State, an independent court), and the Constitutional Court (no equivalent in the USA), to declare his candidacy (and then strenuous control of his activities was mandatory).

Conclusion of all these checks and balance of the democracy on the State: the Parti Socialiste won the French presidential election, and then the legislatives (they already controlled the Senate and the regions). Hence the Financial Transaction Tax is the law in France (as of August 1, 2012). Also the 75% margin tax rate. Plutocrats are not pleased.

However, they act submissive, like lions trying to bite the whip, but carefully crawling back on their bellies. The billionairess Bettencourt, third biggest fortune in France, just sold the island she owned in the Seychelles, making three times the profit, claiming it was all a big mistake, and accepting to pay the 75% tax… On top of a six million euros fine, plus taxes to the Seychelles nation…
PA

It is much easier to fan the red state/blue state divide with endless diversions that don’t really make a bit of difference for anyone. As long as nobody notices that the left and the right in America are really the same and are controlled by the same puppeteers the status quo continues.

I suspect, in varying degrees, it is the same in the rest of the world. I could see something better than this.