Better Thinking: Off Base!


Paul Krugman is not amused by those who want to box him in, and rightly so; say he in “Fields of Expertise”: “One of the more annoying kinds of comment that pops up sometimes on this blog is the complaint that I’m violating some kind of principle whenever I write about anything that isn’t strictly economics.”

The concept of “economy” and the coining of the word, was authored by Xenophon. Xenophon, a golden youth, a child of the rich, was a student and friend of Socrates. He took part in military campaigns, rather as a dilettante and detached observer (he admits). However, when a Greek army found itself leaderless and isolated in the middle of Mesopotamia, he was elected general (!) and did his job superbly.

The Greek army was surrounded by uncountable ferocious enemies. The Persians of Ataxerxes II had proven themselves treacherous beyond belief. After the Greeks had been victorious, during a negotiation, the Spartan overall commander Clearchus and all other Greek senior officers were assassinated by the treachery of the Persian satrap Tissaphernes. (Middle Eastern perfidy has a long history!)

It was high time to think different. General Xenophon did the unexpected; instead of heading west towards Ionian Greece, as Ataxerxes expected, he led the army north, across deserts and what is now called Kurdistan. The mountains were severe, and the Kurds, not amused. However, after treasures of ingeniosity, and ferocious combat, the Greeks pulled through and reached the Black Sea.

Xenophon wrote down this history in Anabasis. Ah, yes, because Xenophon was also a historian. Anabasis means: going up! Or literally; off base! Off base, that is, leaving behind lower dimensions, acquiring higher ones.

Anabasis got the Greeks thinking that maybe the problem of Persia could be solved by conquering the whole damned thing. (Something the fascist pseudo-Greek Alexander so called “The Great” would soon implement, after being taught by another Athenian philosopher from the same tribe, Aristotle: many of the greatest philosophers ever knew each other personally!)

After returning triumphantly to Athens, Xenophon thought of philosophical matters, at the creative level. He got the idea of economy: house (eco) management (nomy). Thus he formally founded a field that had been central to civilization for millennia. Xenophon saw the need. It detached, to some extent, a field of study, making the claim it was partly dimensionally independent  from politics and customs. The veracity of that axiom has been demonstrated since.

Xenophon was an immensely courageous, creative and intelligent man, as his military exploits demonstrate. That’s what it takes to distinguish a concept of importance, previously unobserved, or deemed unworthy. This is the essence of the philosophical method.

So what is philosophy? Guessing what was not guessed before. How? By thinking so broadly, or so extradimensionally that one can see, or imagine connections and concepts that were never seen before. Who is cut for it? The smartest. What are the consequences? Encouraging thinking to go across frontiers that were never even imagined before.

How did we get to have a house and manage it? How did we come out of the cave that way? Because we exerted off base thinking. So the title, of the seven book volumes of Xenophon of his adventures as a general, Anabasis, is actually symbolic of the entire civilizational condition. Charles Quint, another admirable leader of mankind (for the human, and far sighted way in which he treated American natives) may have been inspired when he chose the motto:“Plus Oultre!”

We are living in a science fiction world. Why? because anything is possible. not just technologically: watch the USA having secreted a secret surveillance court making so called “secret laws”. Watch the sulfur of the Secret State Police (GEheime STAat POlizei: Gestapo). Contemplate the consequences if the world economy, which is energy dependent, broke down: no more than two billion people, at best, can be supported by the local economies.

Reading Sci-Fi is relevant to understand what is happening, and, more importantly, what could happen. Specialists, like woodpeckers do what they do well, pecking an overspecialized field of expertise and their brains, or academic careers, are well insulated from shocks.

But geniuses they are not. So keep on broadly thinking, professor Krugman, economics is everywhere, even when we look up to the stars, as we have to. Where we have to go. Be it only if we do the math!

And let the ants do their special things, as they get crushed by the weight of what is for them incomprehensible wisdom on its way towards unimaginable horizons!

Economics is vast, vaster than has been guessed so far. It contains all of physics. And more; all of human behavior, all of human imagination.

Take a particular case: Krugman, and others, have been lamenting that the Republicans in the USA are self destructive, because they want to reduce programs for the poor. And poor, old, voting whites are the main beneficiaries of these programs. So Krugman thinks the danger is limited. However, doing so, he neglects a big chunk of human evolutionary psychology that has consequences, not just on the soul, but on economics.  

One should never underestimate the power of run-away propaganda to hurt those it seduces. There is, deep down in man, born in the evolution of domination, a self destructive streak. Neoconservatives or neofascists exploit it. They may be crazy, but that only reinforces their appeal.

Anabasis, freeing oneself of the base, is the symbol of the human condition, and, a fortiori, civilization. When the mind is flat, the world is flat. It takes more than eyes to see the world. It takes a mind. And it better look up, to make up what was not there before.


Patrice Ayme


Tags: , , ,

11 Responses to “Better Thinking: Off Base!”

  1. GMax Says:

    You say that economy is more general than physics, because it holds it within.
    Can that be mathematically expressed, though?


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      dear GMax: Good question. Economy is very far from this, but, if it came to be just about forces, or more exactly, energy, as physics is, then it would be written down with Lagrangians. The Lagrangians in physics are immensely specialzed, it’s easy to write some that are more general… So yes. However economy contains most of human psychology too, so, as I said, we are far, very very far, from that degree of precision…


  2. Mike Borgman Says:

    Dear Patrice,

    Our apricot tree is so prolific with fruit this year that I’m going door to door with sacks of beautiful fruit trying to not let any of it go to waste. We live in Yakima WA which is the fruit capital of the Pacific Northwest and so I have some pretty stiff competition. Cherry season has started so I’m already in trouble with literal bags of cherries being passed around and remember this is all free!
    I really liked the fact that Paul K. felt compelled to explain that it was OK to get off subject, so I thought I’d try and “out off subject him” and you of course, but you’ll always find a way to get back.
    Now please forgive me if I started something here but it wasn’t done intentionally. I’m already laughing about this not meeting the usual intellectual standards we’ve all become accustomed to.



    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear Mike: Quite the opposite. Although no scientific study is out yet, there is plenty of evidence all around, that the CO2 in the air has passed some tipping point of sort (another one from the one I claimed I detected in:

      I have noticed this in forests I know well, in Europe or America…
      Thus the CO2 acts as a natural fertilizer (as it should!)… Ooopss, sorry about the word “natural”, but the CO2 is more natural than the industrial fertilizers we stuff in the ground. Anyway, the apricots may come from there… A case where the climate moves faster than the science…


  3. EugenR Says:

    Dear Patrice, cant help myself, i must to publish this link on your site even if it is not relevant to your last article. Yet this is a too good description of klepto-banksterism not to share it with you.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Oh Eugen, you are welcome to do so. News have been pretty outrageous and intriguing in recent weeks, all over the place, I have been thinking of renewing my aphorisms sets. Many can be adressed in a lapidory fashion.

      And one never talks enough about klepto-banksterism. I have met banksters, I could not believe them. They are gangsters first, but, differently from mafiosi, they see absolutely no trouble whatsoverv with their activities.

      It’s pretty obvious that people such as Krugman (bless his soul not about that!) have a systemic bias: they propagandize against the euro, but never against banksters. Don’t even mention the problem. The piece in the NYT, on the front page (I get the print edition), in big letters, about Cyprus and the euro not being the euro, having “broken down” there, two days ago was typical: deliberate disinformation. Cyprus’ crisis was solely a banksterism crisis. The euro has little to do with is, except that before, gangsters could money launder through Cyprus, easily, and, now, it’s harder.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Eugen: William Blacke is an excellent professor (law and finance). He is carefully NOT listened to by the government and the pundits. Thanks for the link!

      I was outraged about the way the Obama adminstration dealt with the subprime crisis as early as February 2009:
      The paradigm of just replenishing the same bank holding corporations with money was started then, in the USA (in contradiction with PM Brown’s earlier nationalization in the UK). Disintegrating the largest Cyprus bank is a departure from that pattern, a return to common sense (by opposition to plutocratic sense)…


  4. pshakkottai Says:

    Hi patrice:
    Names are important.
    You told me that Romans named things appropriately, for example, fanatics from fana for temple.
    In Sanskrit economy is named artha shastra or money science
    And geography is bhu gola or Earth Sphere
    In Tamil economy is sukha adara or happiness-basis, a far cry from austerity.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear Partha: Very interesting. Eco-nomy as house-management means that the economy is much more than what Wall Street, greedsters and banksters want to reduce it to, namely as “all about money”.

      Greco-Romans did not always name thing appropriately, or in time, because, if they had, their civilization would not have broken and collapsed. Between the time Rome-Constantinople removed the legions from North-West Europe, and the official “renovatio” of the Roman Empire under Charlemagne, 400 years exactly elapsed!

      Anyway, please keep these translations coming… “Happiness basis” is a particularly good one, and all too forgotten! I think plutocracy perverts mental systems, all the way down to the most basic feelings.


  5. Lovell Says:

    Dear Patrice,

    Happy 224th Bastille anniversary. Vive la France!


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Thanks! 224th already? Wow! It’s also the 224th anniversary of the French and USA Constitutions! Sister republics, and, as frequent in sibblings, contentious… OK, let me write a little essay about it…


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: