Stealth Climate Deniers

The United Nations 300 top climate scientists from all over the world, came up with an alarming climate warming report: the warming is fully on, and its weird effects are showing all over, with changes in winds, the strongest hurricane ever, by a long shot, and even paradoxical situations, such as local cooling offshore, from twice stronger trade winds, causing a high pressure ridge, and a massive drought in the American West. (OK, it’s me observing the latter, not the UN, but it’s true nevertheless!)

There are two types of deniers: the grotesque ones, paid to say CO2 is good, climate has always changed, it’s not warming up, and getting more acid, and anyway, both are good. And then there are the stealth deniers.

50 Billion Tons Of CO2 Equivalent Gases Dumped In Earth’s Atmosphere, Per Year

50 Billion Tons Of CO2 Equivalent Gases Dumped In Earth’s Atmosphere, Per Year

[Observe the important role played by Methane. Although CH4 does not acidify the oceans as CO2 does.]

Stealth deniers are within, say, the media of the USA itself, under an unassuming form. The New York Times wrote several anti-deniers editorials. And yet, the Times itself is ambiguous, at best, about whether there is a CO2 problem.

Take the otherwise honorable Paul Krugman at the New York Times, the self glorified “Conscience of a Liberal”: Krugman talks to no end about providing “liquidity” to his friends the bankers and about the abysmal, pathetic pseudo-reform called Obamacare. That’s socio-economy for Krugman. (Obamacare is a dismally unimpressive tweak in the American greedy health care system that Obama himself, nowadays, tries his best to sabotage!)

However, Paul Krugman, blessed be his name, and all too many economic pundits in the USA, never, ever, talks about the most major economic issue of our times, the necessity to effect a massive transition towards sustainable energy.

By talking obsessively about minor economic issues (success! Obamacare now covers 2% of the population of the USA, 4 years after being passed into law! Sadness! Banks starving for free money so they can’t leverage, and play futures and dark pools as much as they want!), Krugman avoids the most serious of our times, and any times before those. Namely, the poisoning of the Earth, while most of the planet’s effective activities are starving for energy.

Yet, such a transition would provide with millions of jobs in the USA alone (a small and partial energy “change” in Germany provided officially with 400,000 jobs; it is a lame change, as it shot down futuristic nuclear energy solutions, though).

So what’s going on? Comments of mine making this observation were censored at the New York Times. Actually, the New York Times (supposedly left, liberal, with a conscience, blah blah blah, etc.) is shilling for fracking. “U.S. Hopes Boom in Natural Gas Can Curb Putin… by sending our surplus natural gas to Europe and Ukraine in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG), the United States …stiffen resistance to Vladimir Putin’s aggressive behavior.

Forget that the United States currently lacks a capacity to export LNG to Europe… until the 2020s… Just focus on the article’s central reportorial flaw: it fails to identify a single reason why future American LNG exports (which could wind up anywhere) would have any influence whatsoever on the Russian president’s behavior.”

Instead, the economic main stream of the USA is going full steam ahead, fracking away. The fracking is causing huge leaks of methane. It’s also impossible to speak of the USA and omit its main factory, China. The tandem of the USA and the PRC are into ever more desperate fossil fuel production. USA coal production is now sent to Germany and China… Giving a biting irony to Obama’s notion of fracking gas playing the role of a “bridge fuel“. A bridge, across the oceans, to disaster, indeed.

Ever More Fossils Burned, Most Of Them, Now.

Ever More Fossils Burned, Most Of Them, Now.

(Meanwhile the short sighted Obama proposes to reduce thermonuclear fusion research by 17%, in 2015, while giving the rich a gift of $7,500, each time they buy a car from the 7 billion dollar boy, Elon Musk; thermonuclear fusion is the one and only long term hope for sustainable energy; all other energy sources, except geothermal, which does not work, are derived from thermonuclear fusion!)

Another point I have made for years: at some point, exactly, the methane tipping point, massive amounts of methane will be catastrophically released from the oceans. Methane is already massively released from USA fracking, and from the oceans. Catastrophic release will involve tsunamis, and greatly accelerated warming. (That has happened in the North Atlantic, 7,000 years ago.) It will start suddenly. It could start tomorrow.

The media of the USA is culprit of not emphasizing that the climate problem is, first of all, an economic catastrophe, and opportunity to smash out of an unsustainable past dominated by fossil fuel plutocrats. But then most of the Main Stream Media in the USA is owned by plutocrats, partial to the present order of things, including the energetic order.

Anyway, as usual, it was an irritating pleasure to be censored by the Times: this way I know what New York plutocrats really care about, where they fear truth the most. It’s a sort of radar to detect malfeasance.

Patrice Aymé

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Stealth Climate Deniers”

  1. @OppressorsOrg Says:

    Patrice Ayme,
    You were mentioned in a Tweet! @OppressorsOrg

    The Plutocracy Daily is out!… Stories via @Tyranosopher @brainspirations


  2. Patrice Ayme Says:

    [Sent to Scia. Am. Oct 14.]

    Climate change an immediate threat? Pentagon says? Well, this is just the beginning. Wonder if Hagel feels responsible? The USA going the wrong way demolished Kyoto. Countries that did not follow the USA into more fossil fuels lost.


  3. Patrice Ayme Says:

    Reacting to:


    Merci, tres interessant!

    Ou commencer dans ce tissue de mensonges et d’idioties?

    Ceux qui sont payes pour mentir, mentent:

    Mes essais sont bien sur les meilleurs:

    Une seule chose compte: la densite’ de CO2 et autres gazs a effet de serre fait par l’homme augmente a 1% par an. Du coup la mer devient acide.

    Les coups de froids locaux sont dus a la fonte, de meme qu’il fait froid au pied du refrigerateur, si on ouvre la porte du congelateur. Voir Younger Dryas.

    2014 sera peu-etre l’annee la plus chaude.

    L’ete dernier, des explosions de methane geantes ont eu lieu en Siberie…

    Le niveau de la mer augmente de 4 millimetres par an (satellite altimetry) et un centimetre en certains endroits.

    Bruler des combustibles fossils tue 7 million de personnes par an.

    Heureusement, le grand ami de Putine, de Margerie, le morse plutocrate de chez TOTAL SA, il a creve’:

    Patrice Ayme’

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Luigi GALLY
    To: Patrice ; bernard liger ; Leon Perron ; Pizzuto ; Nori Ricca
    Sent: Sat, Nov 22, 2014 10:29 am
    Subject: tr: chgt climat

    > Message du 22/11/14 18:56
    > De : “guy.lucazeau”
    > A : “luigi gally”
    > Copie à :
    > Objet : chgt climat
    > lis ça luigi et fais le suivre à patrick ayme


  4. Guy Lacazeau Says:

    Salut Patrice

    tu renvoies au site info-resistance qui est tenu par un “original” dont les accusations de manipulations de jacques Duran sont tres bien contestées dans les commentaires de Hervé et TD

    Duran est un vrai scientifique (pas besoin d’etre climatologue pour savoir lire une courbe ou comprendre les limites d’un modèle)

    en ce qui concerne la montée des oceans voici ce qu’en dit Duran:

    extrait de:

    3) La hausse du niveau des océans à l’échelle du globe

    Le graphe (en bleu) a été tracé à partir des données de l’Université du Colorado par le Prof Humlum. Ce dernier a effectué une analyse polynomiale d’ordre deux de la série des données fournies par cette université. Les résulats de son analyse sont représentés sur son graphe par une courbe en trait pointillés bleus et un petit cartouche de même couleur.4youmslr
    Anomalie globale du niveau moyen des océans en mm de 1993 à Mars 2014.

    Comme on peut l’observer le “best fit” polynomial quadratique obtenu par Humlum a un indice de confiance de 93%. Il comporte un faible terme quadratique négatif (cartouche du graphique) ce qui m’a incité à chercher à le mettre en évidence en superposant une droite (en point-tirets rouge) sur son tracé (superposition de de 1993 à 2003) en pointillés bleus.
    Comme on le voit, le terme quadratique négatif représente une diminution tout à fait perceptible de la vitesse de hausse des océans ce qui est en accord avec un certain nombre d’observations indépendantes publiées récemment.
    Ceci qui est en accord avec plusieurs publications et contraire aux affirmations alarmistes généralement répandues selon lesquelles la hausse du niveau des océans s’accélérerait.
    Il n’en est rien. Au contraire, la hausse ralentit depuis quelques années, ce qui est d’ailleurs cohérent avec la stagnation de la température globale de la planète.

    Comme on le constate, les observations concernant aussi bien l’évolution de la température moyenne du globe que le regel des banquises arctique et antarctique et le ralentissement de la hausse du niveau des mers, incitent plutôt à l’optimisme qu’au pessimisme.

    la mise a jour du 17/11 est à lire en entier

    qu’en penses tu?

    bien cordialement


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Bonjour Guy:
      J’en pense que le graphe nous montre une montee des oceans de 80 millimetres en 20 ans. Donc 4 mm/an. A ce rythme il va falloir 200,000 ans pour arriver a Briancon, donc, effectivement, il n’y a pas de quoi s’alarmer…

      Je ne savais pas que la mer etait deja arrivee a Boulder, Colorado, hahaha. On n’arrete pas le progress…
      4mm/an: altimetrie satellite.

      Tout cela est un faux debat. On peut manifestement pas continuer a augmenter les gaz Anthropocene a effet de serre de 1% par an. Donc il faut des energies nouvelles. Vraiment nouvelles.

      Chine + USA produisent 4 fois plus de ces gazs que l’Europe… Mais leur economies, on peut meme dire leurs empires, grossissent plus vites… Du coup.

      Courtillot et Allegre sont de vrais scientifiques, vraiment celebres pour leur travail scientifique. Mais l’argent des Total, Schlumberger, et tous les autres, les a completement corrompus… Sans cette corruption leur institut n’existerait pas (IPGVP).

      Et pour lire quelque chose de plus interessant:


  5. Science Too Mighty For Its Own Good? | Patrice Ayme's Thoughts Says:

    […] CO2 emissions according to Wikipedia are four times greater (34 Gt), and according to me, even the CO2 EQUIVALENT TOTAL is six times greater, up to 50 Gigatons per […]


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: