USA’s War Crimes

It is completely obvious to all people of good faith that the government of the USA, and much of the oligarchy of the USA were culprit of activities punished by the Nuremberg Tribunal, when they committed in Iraq:

Crimes against peace:

(A) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (A).

[Thanks Dominique Deux for the reminder.]

George Bush Dodges An Imaginary Torpedo

George Bush Dodges An Imaginary Torpedo

When the “Jihadists” of ISIS conquered Mosul, American made helicopters started to fly in their support. Obviously, they were piloted by ex-officers of Saddam Hussein’s army… Supporting the “Jihadist” army. Thus the present battle in Iraq is a direct counter-attack against the fascist dictatorship installed in Baghdad by Bush and his ilk. Bush’s war is going on. And the USA is not winning.

By brandishing the name “Bush”, for an aircraft carrier, the USA’s oligarchy has chosen to flaunt one of its plutocratic symbol: the Bush’s dynasty.

Yes, George Bush is now an American nuclear carrier: American carriers used to be named according to Revolutionary, or otherwise democratic battles (Yorktown, Lexington, Midway, etc.). Now the carriers are named after American plutocrats, and a pedigree involving collaboration Hitler (Bush), apparently even better, being president without election (Ford… Or is that for helping Hitler?) is best.

American plutocrats play very hard on the international scene…In their own interest. They don’t hesitate to impose internal American law worldwide. The same American law that makes the USA into the largest Tax Haven for Plutocrats, in the universe, by far.

See for a recent example the usage of American law against the giant European bank BNP. On June 5, Obama claimed that American justice was independent, and that it was not the case in other countries. Here is Obama, with characteristic Washington hypocrisy:

“I do not pick up the phone and tell the attorney general how to prosecute cases that have been brought. I do not push for settlements of cases that have been brought. Those are decisions that are made by an independent Department of Justice… Perhaps it is a different tradition than exists in other countries, but it is designed to make sure that the rule of law is not in any way impacted by political expediency.”

When U.S. attorneys make final decisions, Obama said, “I’ll read about it in the newspaper just like everybody else.”

However, in 2003, the violations of International Law by the oligarchy of the USA were extensive throughout the leading society of the USA. Media such as the New York Times fabricated evidence of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Applying a country’s own law to violate International Law is grave.

The USA, in a revealing act, is sending the giant nuclear aircraft carrier “George Bush” into the Persian Gulf, in apparent support of Iran. George Bush! Got it? USA sends carrier USS Plutocrat to Persian Gulf! Guess what? American companies got the green light to prepare for sanction busting with Iran.

While BNP is sued for doing just that.


BNP: Indians, Red Skins, best when dead. American style Justice, in the highest, most efficient, free market tradition. Department of Justice and U.S. Cavalry, hand in hand.

American plutocrats, tax dodging USA corporations, plutocrats: good guys.


Principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal, 1950

Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal. Adopted by the International Law Commission of the United Nations, 1950.

Introductory note: Under General Assembly Resolution 177 (II), paragraph (a), the International Law Commission was directed to “formulate the principles of international law recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the judgment of the Tribunal.”

Principle I

Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.

Principle II

The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.

Principle III

The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

Principle IV

The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

Principle V

Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.

Principle Vl

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under; international law:

A) Crimes against peace: 

1) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

2) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (1)

B) War crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave-labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

C) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Principle VII

Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principles VI is a crime under international law.



A large portion of the leading oligarchy of the USA committed the crimes in bold above, either in preparation, during, and consecutively to the invasion of Iraq.

Moreover the Department of Justice of the USA, that Obama’s mouth is so full of, is certainly, by not pursuing these crimes, an accomplice under the Nuremberg Trial principles, as described above.



When Obama speaks about the independence of the Department of Justice, he sounds like someone who believes only idiots listen to him. Why does he think that President Kennedy made his own brother Attorney General? Because the oligarchy of the USA was, at the time, pervaded with various satanic principles, such as institutionalized racism (school, voting, laws),  mixing it up with the mafia (as in Cuba), and a state solidly held by people who had enabled Nazism (such as the Dulles brothers, ex-employees of Bush, Harriman and company, who held State and the CIA).

Well, sorry, too much thinking is obviously against the best interest of Obama. Some are just obsessed by their skins, not the highest principles.

This is exactly why those with the highest principles have to come to the fore. Be it by just stating the obvious: by refusing to prosecute criminal individuals of the highest order, the USA is in danger of flaunting the highest criminality as the highest principle.

But what else to expect from a country that claims to be a democracy, while naming a carrier after a president nominated by Richard Nixon? What about the USS Al Capone, as we are at it?

Morality, often, albeit not always, wins. Or let’s say, it’s one of the largest weapons in any army’s arsenal. It could be a vile morality, such as the one of Saddam Hussein’s regime: it worked, better, for Iraq than the murderous chaos Bush replaced it with. Or it could be that  Genghis Khan’s imposed on Mongolia, so efficient, wars were won, one after the other.

When Gbagbo, the Ivorian president, had turned into a bloody dictator, Mr. Obama, the one who does not interfere with Justice, so he claims when it’s convenient to him, proposed Gbagbo a golden exile in the USA, complete with “Visiting Professorships” (in the fully appropriate Plutocratic universities).

Bush is more than a vicious man, or a plutocrat. He has become a supremely hypocritical moral principle, and symbol, that plutocrats can get away with anything, including mass murder, and deliberate mass lying to wage a war of aggression. As long as Washington takes their orders.

(The evidence for mass lying is now to the fore: the head of British intelligence reported to PM Blair that Bush, as early as September 2011 wanted to attack Iraq, and was actively doctoring intelligence, thanks to “weasels“. The memo was published by the Times. So why is not Blair on trial?)

The problem is that infernal morality has no bearing on physics, or chemistry.

Along 1500 kilometers the Pacific coast of the USA, it was just announced that acidifying waters are dissolving the shells of tiny sea snails. War against the Earth: what could go wrong?

Why don’t we dissolve the fundamental cause of this, the plutocratic morality, instead? Judge Bush.

Patrice Aymé

Tags: , , , ,

12 Responses to “USA’s War Crimes”

  1. Patrice Ayme Says:

    [Published By RSN]
    Bush and Blair are, on the objective criterion of how many innocents they brought the death of, worse than ben Laden by at least two orders of magnitude.

    To fix Iraq, one needs to judge Bush first:


    • Kevin Berger Says:

      “To fix Iraq, one needs to judge Bush first”

      Meanwhile, in the WSJ…

      So, no, apart maybe from History’s judgement (and even that, the rewriting already is ongoing, and the narratives being shaped), there is little to fear for the guilty parties.


      • Patrice Ayme Says:

        Thanks Kevin! I missed the Cheney article. Too bad. I would have enjoy adding salt to their open wounds…

        Much of what the article says is correct, sort of, but that does not mean that Cheney is not a war criminal. That’s the beauty of contextuality: Hitler could be right in many of the things he said, but that did not mean he was not a war criminal.

        Maybe there is little fear, but, by presenting the case that these people are just criminals, one can exert mental pressure. THE US Supreme Court admitted that they personally love the death penalty, but they changed its extensive application in the USA because of the scorn they felt from their European colleagues.

        Plus, the teaching of history in EurAmerica is deeply flawed.

        The real reason I rushed in these two reminders that the Iraq invasion by the USA was a war crime, was to torpedo the enormous pressure under which my friend Barack was to start bombing right away, last week. I don’t think he wants to sink that way. Thus my discordant shrill warnings.

        BTW, be it only for the USA, invading Iraq was a greater disaster than 9/11: Nearly 5,000 USA soldiers died. Dozen of thousands were wounded, sometimes horribly. Just for Texas Oil Men.


  2. gmax Says:

    All commentators, deeply ashamed, and baffled, deep in their burrows, are too scared to salute you and your terrifying ideas. Brrr…


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Well, most people tend to eschew serious controversy, and drastic accusation. If we were in Germany before 1945, and I called for Hitler’s judgment, I would not be very popular either…


  3. Patrice Ayme Says:

    The International Energy Institute, and the like expected 3/5 of the increase in WORLD wide oil production to come from Iraq. Now clearly, it won’t be the case. The oil men and women are bitter.
    [Thanks Kevin!]

    BTW, a little detail Texas oil critters forget: be it only for the USA, invading Iraq was a greater disaster than 9/11: Nearly 5,000 USA soldiers died. Dozen of thousands were wounded, sometimes horribly. Just for Texas Oil Men.


  4. Patrice Ayme Says:

    [Sent to NYT, 6/21]

    This is, under the guise of an Islamist terror group, the counter-attack of the Iraqi state that Bush and his ilk tried to destroy.
    Not to partake in that war crime in any sense, Obama ought to stay away.
    So the price of oil will go higher, so what?


    • N.B. Says:

      if the price of oil goes too high destroying our economy our own militias arm to the teeth will get frisky and feisty as Texas and Alaska break away from USA and Rand Paul build a wall around his own state when they reject him as prez or it could get worse than that…


      • Patrice Ayme Says:

        Hilarious, N.B.. However unreal, because the USA can be self sufficient energetically, on an emergency, and then permanent basis. Anyway, the big Pentagon owns both Texas and Alaska. Especially Alaska: it’s full of Air Force in this season especially…


  5. Kevin Berger Says:

    Speaking of American justice :


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Another excellent link! Thanks! BTW, that demonstrates the Anglo-Saxon conspiracy is objectively describable… Spy on everything, but not the other Anglo conspirators.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Spying on Petrobras (Brazil oil company) made a scandal in Brazil. However, the scandal is more for show as Roussef agreed to buy the (mostly American made) Grippen… No doubt the right people were rightly paid.


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: