The Future Of The Soul?

Evolving, And Collective, The Soul Still Exists, And Science Is Its Prophet:

Is it useful to speak of the “soul”? Why not? Why to deprive us of words? Over the millennia, the word “soul” had many meanings. No, immortality is not necessarily a property of the soul.

There was always physics, and, thus, there was always metaphysics. The latter being the logical universe of the former. There will be always physics, and thus there always will be metaphysics.

Metaphysics is what is beyond physics. Any logical discourse has a universe that is beyond itself.

Our Soul Decides What It Means

Our Soul Decides What It Means

And mathematicians have agreed to disagree with themselves about metamathematics:

Thus, both physics and metaphysics are moving targets. So the soul, naturally, should be, as understanding progresses. But we thinkers, are hunters, and we go after the biggest preys. We need an unending chase, to feed our souls.

To each stage in the mentalization of the universe, to each stage in human understanding, its own physics, metaphysics, and thus, then notion of a soul.

Neurology indeed enables to embody some of the notions of soul Aristotle floated across. One can speak of the “German soul”. And the “German soul” has changed.

Quantum Physics has started to spawn Quantum Biology, thus, soon, a scientific system of ideas that will be best described as “Quantum Minds”, not to say Quantum Mentalization.

If one brings all what we know about Quantum Physics, to bear on what the soul could be, our mental universe, the universe of possibilities and the imagination, tremendously expands.

The Quantum is characterized by waves, something intrinsically vague (pun intended, except it’s not a pun: “wave” and “vague” have the same root).

Quantum waves are non-local, and entangled, so they embody (sort of, as they constitute, de facto, the “ether”) something going much further than the body.

When a mind is operating, a beyond-astronomical, beyond-set, beyond-category, entanglement of wavy delocalizations is self interacting. This is the soul.

The Quantum Mind, per its very nature, is hard to know: it’s always changing, and interacting with it is a more-than-delicate matter. So the very question of whether it survives is inappropriate.

Souls are always interacting with souls. Quantum-interacting (even though the interaction goes through classical means, that is, particles, at some point).

Thus souls survive in the collective.

Ever more arguments, and even now experiments, show that those waves, while not particles, are endowed with an ethereal existence capable of differences, thus identity.

One of the philosophical lessons of Quantum Physics is that local is global. Another lesson is that the particular world (the world of particles), is only a minute part of the world. This universe is full of waves, and Dark matter is its prophet.

Full Quantum Neurology is a soul in waiting. Only thus will consciousness be explained. Meanwhile, as physics cannot even get started on consciousness, we have to admit, just because of that, its incompleteness.

Notice in passing that the Quantum Biology based soul does not suffer of predestination problem often plaguing old fashion religion. The Quantum seems to say that the spirit is everything, and has a global reach, but still, it is, somehow, local. That’s unifying, somehow, very disparate and traditionally contradictory notions.

Our moral discourse needs to know there is more than us, because our discourse itself is more than us, and Quantum Wavy, besides. Morality needs a universe, the framework Nihilism is deprived of. And, logically there is more than us. This supplement d’ame, we give it a name, the soul. We are a discourse, the soul is our universe. Amen.

To diminish words and concepts diminishes the reach of our poetical imagination, central to mental creativity. Let’s not be afraid of words. Let’s, instead, endow them with refresh meaning.

Patrice Ayme’

Tags: , , , , ,

3 Responses to “The Future Of The Soul?”

  1. gmax Says:

    How do the words ‘soul” and ‘race’ help? Are they irreplaceable concepts?


  2. dominique deux Says:

    “soul”, “race”, “creation”, “market” and many others are verbal concepts (words) which do not refer to existing entities (delusions), but nevertheless have a ponderous impact on reality through the everyday activities of the deluded. They thus cannot escape scrutiny.
    They also are convenient shorthand to designate complex phenomena, processes, categories etc, making them easier to contemplate by the (hopefully) non deluded, but unfortunately comforting the deluded in their delusion.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      You are right, Dominique. This is the difficulty, indeed.

      An example: I often accuse American individuals or institutions of anti-French “racism”. They haughtily reply that “French” is not a race. The same (including Obama) are ready to brandish “Anti-Americanism”.

      So, as it is not a race, all sorts of things can be done against the French, that would be viewed as racist if done just the same against, say, the Jews. Or even against the “Americans”!

      There is a word for that concept, “anti-Americanism”, enabling its existence. A serious problem, American plutophiles claim. While denying “Anti-Frenchism” exists. Why? There is no such a word.

      So when the USA, starting in the 1940s, work to systematically destroy French influence in South America, using various government devised mighty tricks, that was neither from “Anti-Frenchism”, or anti-French racism, as neither concept exist, either through lack of word, or non-existence of “racism”.

      At some point I used the concept of “German Soul“, meaning the German soul that was murderously fascist and racist, say circa 1914, and a philosophical journal barred the comment, on the ground that they “did not know what it meant” (they have changed their minds, since, thanks to my efforts of instruction! :-)).

      Actually, in the USA racism is alive and well (in some parts, say Texas; much less in others). It just has transmogrified semantically…


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: