DSK, Hillary, & Spiritually Corrupt Justice


Hillarious Clinton: Will the Joke Be On Us Again?

Ex New York Senator and Secretary of State Clinton made her first major campaign speech. In New York, with the reborn World Trade Center in the background, as she pointed out. She looked fantastic, spoke even better than that, and promised plenty of candy to anybody who voted for Obama.

Is she for real? We now know Obama was not for real: when he could have done everything, in the beginning, he did nothing. I got very depressed (I am intimately involved). Now Obama has stooped, for all to see, to ally himself with such right wing extremists that even plutocrat Pelosi voted against him. Obama fights to enable plutocratic corporations to sue the government of the USA, one of the many seductions of the TPP. That Trans Pacific Partnership is negotiated in secret, among the haves, as it should.

Tigers & Plutocrats Have A Sense Of Right Which Makes Them Even Worse

Tigers & Plutocrats Have A Sense Of Right Which Makes Them Even Worse

[Siberian/Amur Panthera Tigris Altaica.]

Is Hillary for real? It’s hilarious: there is no choice. The excellent Senator of Vermont (Green Mount in French), Bernie Sanders, has a much better program: to make the USA like France (hopefully without the tyrannical French law, administration, and taxes on the middle class).

Bernie’s program could be paid, if, and only if, the taxes on the rich got as high as they were in the 1940-1970 period. However the vulgum pecus has been conditioned to identify with the wealthiest, spiritually speaking. An hilarious form of corruption. Bernie would lose to Jeb Bush, as a result.

It’s hard to have a democracy when common folks’ spirits are those of dogs conditioned like Pavlov’s dogs, to salivate, each time they hear of wealth and mentors.


Carlton Affair: Sex Drawing Rights?

Carlton is a luxury hotel in Northern France where Dominique Strauss-Kahn (“DSK”), ex-head of the International Monetary Fund, was suspected by French “judges” to have organized an international prostitution ring. How likely did that sound? Not too much: no government prosecutor could be found to prosecute DSK about this. But the judges persisted in their search for judgment of whom Manhattan (aka Wall Street) found right to jail. Perhaps the honorable French judges hoped to qualify as honorary Wall Street Very Important Persons, or something equally worthy. In this plutocratic world, consideration by the wealthy has become everything (wealth can even get you passports fast!). Wall Street inspired “justice” has been relentless to find that whoever looks like strong competition is in breach of the law of the USA.

After four years DSK and 13 other co-defendants were found not guilty whatsoever. DSK said: “Tout cela pour ca. Quelle destruction.” (All this for this, what destruction.)

DSK of course deserved his punishment: he drew for hundreds of billions of SDR. DSK was then ripe for retaliation, extortion, vulture justice. See how it all started, from that well known left wing propaganda outfit, CNN, which wrote in 2011:IMF calls for dollar alternative”:

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — The International Monetary Fund issued a report Thursday on a possible replacement for the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

The IMF said Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs, could help stabilize the global financial system.

SDRs represent potential claims on the currencies of IMF members. SDRs can be converted into whatever currency a borrower requires at exchange rates based on a weighted basket of international currencies. The IMF typically lends countries funds denominated in SDRs

While they are not a tangible currency, some economists argue that SDRs could be used as a less volatile alternative to the U.S. dollar.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the IMF, acknowledged there are some “technical hurdles” involved with SDRs, but he believes they could help correct global imbalances and shore up the global financial system.

Over time, there may also be a role for the SDR to contribute to a more stable international monetary system,” he said.

This is what Keynes wanted to do, as head of the commission in charge of setting up the world financial system in 1944-45. Lord Keynes, who could not be accused to not be a racist plutocrat, found himself in a total fight with the government of the USA. Enable to stop Keynes, the USA finally made a forgery, and substituted the forgery during the signing ceremony. This is how the dollar became the world’s reserve currency (a move that torpedoed Europe as an independent financial actor). But here is again CNN Money, from 2011:

“The goal is to have a reserve asset for central banks that better reflects the global economy since the dollar is vulnerable to swings in the domestic economy and changes in U.S. policy.

In addition to serving as a reserve currency, the IMF also proposed creating SDR-denominated bonds, which could reduce central banks’ dependence on U.S. Treasuries. The Fund also suggested that certain assets, such as oil and gold, which are traded in U.S. dollars, could be priced using SDRs.

Oil prices usually go up when the dollar depreciates. Supporters say using SDRs to price oil on the global market could help prevent spikes in energy prices that often occur when the dollar weakens significantly.”

As many men of power, DSK was sex-crazed (although this is a tangent, it’s an important one: when you are at war, trying to impose your power, you need extreme aggressivity, and, in males, sex and aggression are roughly connected; so sex acts as a relief; the present French president is supposed to go around like a crazy rabbit, although he looks like nothing; Dr. Goebbels, the Nazi, a deformed midget, was even worse; his hatred of Jews was born the day a beautiful Jewess dared to turn him down; when the time came to take out Assad, the sex crazed Hollande had the balls, but Obama lost his; Hillary, a hawk who long watched Bill, has her own domination hormones; she actually said something very strange, exciting, scary and extremely revealing, in her own discourse in New York, I have to check the transcript, before writing it down here…).

So DSK was easy to bring down, by making sex charges against him. In the Carlton Affair, extremely expensive prostitutes operated on several continents, including the USA (yes, the USA is a country-continent). For the occasion, apparently corrupt (French) judges, posed those ladies of sex as “victims”.

However, there was no evidence whatsoever DSK ever paid a dime for sex. He was adamant that he never did, that defeated the purpose (seduction from his good looks, I guess…). So who paid those hard sex workers, to pose as victims? Those ladies who charge a thousand Euros a night? The judges? People whom the judges should have known about? Girls want to know.

Some will sneer that I proffered the heavy accusation of corruption against judges, without any direct proof, and that, this is, per se, a crime.  Yes, it’s a crime, as implementing a plan to draw trillions of dollars worth of SDR by DSK was a crime. To paraphrase president Jefferson, some crimes it’s our duty to commit.

There are two types of corruption: what is labelled as such in some countries under some laws. The plutocracy of the USA is notoriously equipped with laws to accuse rivals of corruption. In China, president Xi had the ex-security chief, Zhou Yongkang, condemned to life in prison, for corruption. In an officially secret trial. Corruption, there too, is in the eye of the beholder. Xi’s family is said to own hundreds of millions of real estate in Hong-Kong alone.

The other type of corruption is mental. The spirit itself is corrupt. It is broken-with. In the case of Obama, the left, the spirit of the left, with the help of the naive, such as yours truly, elected someone whose spirit was, deep down, straight out of the London’s Financial Times. The spirit of the left was ruptured-with the spirit of the Financial Times.

When the currency of one country controlled by Wall Street, is the world’s reserve currency, there can’t be economic, financial, and social justice, worldwide. This is the spirit which break the spirit of justice. Whether French judges were aware of this, is unlikely. Instead, they got carried away by a weird spirit of justice which defined the partisan of SDRs as the devil incarnate, and blackmailing high class prostitutes into confirming this, was viewed as justice.

The tiger is most dangerous, when he believes he fights for justice. Yet, there is no justice when the very spirit of justice has been corrupted by anything far removed from correct human ethology. Sex is ethological, the dollar as world reserve currency is not.

Will Clinton be able to undo some of what her husband did, when he himself undid president Roosevelt’s Banking Act of 1933? Why not? That would be the best way for her to divorce him, and impose whom ought to have been really the boss, and rule, with a less corrupt spirit.

At some point, the true leaders of the human spirit realize that to leave behind a nicer place in the sun is more important than to get to a place in the sun. Obama got to his place, played big boy on the town, forgot it took balls to be the real thing, communed with the spirit of London’s Financial Times, and wasted our times. A mother may be keener to leave a better prospects for Earth behind.

Patrice Ayme’  

Tags: , , , , ,

19 Responses to “DSK, Hillary, & Spiritually Corrupt Justice”

  1. brodix Says:


    You are certainly an optimist, to think Hillary will change her tune. As you say, Obama had the chance to clean up the system for its own long term good, like Xi is trying to do in China and showed every way possible that he had no intention. Hillary has shown at every opportunity that she worships the dollar regime and tigers don’t often change their stripes.
    If the left wants to prevail in the future, they are not going to do it by reforming a corrupted establishment, but offering a new vision.
    The new has to start at the bottom and work its way up, otherwise it is just a branch of the old. So it needs to start slowly and incubate this vision, as the old order self destructs and using that self destruction as an object lesson for those too young to be committed. That way, it doesn’t waste energy battling the old and fighting on its terms.
    While you don’t take many of my ideas too seriously, here is a good argument for public banking, which would be one of the primary aspects of a better social order.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Well, Obama talked one way, acted the opposite. We don’t know what Hillary would have done. Maybe she would have done much more, much better than Obama (I was not just a supporter, but an activist, friend, and acted significantly behind the scenes; I was suspecting Hillary would do exactly as Obama, to my horror, consternation did…)

      New vision is from Senator Sanders. But that won’t be elected.

      I have written dozens of pages about banking. The system as we have it is public, to the profit of an oligarchy. It’s a complete dictatorship, a confiscation of the state by the few. Absolutely unacceptable. I will look at your link.


      • brodix Says:

        “The system as we have it is public, to the profit of an oligarchy.”
        Very much so. As is obvious though, there would never be discussions of how a currency based on public debt needs to have much of the profits cycled back through the public sector, not to have the entire public commons be given to the private sector to pay the debt being incurred otherwise, unless it could be combined into an even bigger topic.
        Which gets back to my prior post;
        That the public can only really be moved by simple arguments that large numbers of people could debate openly and there exists just such an observation, in the nature of time. That we think of it as the point of the present moving from past to future, which physics has built into its mathematical models.
        This would then lead to larger levels of sociological debate, given that all of civilization is built on the historical narrative and that would bleed over into the idea of God as a singular entity. One which is built into the assumption of time as a singular narrative. Rather then that bottom up elemental state of consciousness permeating the present state.
        So if you could get that debate started and all the consternation it would cause for various religious and top down cultural systems, the issue of the nature of currency would be an easy nut to crack open.
        Just saying.


        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          There is more than 1.2 billion Indians, they have a million gods. There is 1.4 billion Chinese, they have no god. There is half a billion Europeans, they could not care less about god(s). So the god obsession, a recent plutocratic trick antinomic to the foundations of the USA, is neither here nor there. In truth it shows citizens of the USA have been decerebrated. Decerebrated people can’t handle the most basic questions, such as the nature of money…

          Without going too radical, one could prevent some sorts of activities to banks, pertaining to derivatives. I have talked of this with high level bankers, and they agree. That’s main problem I see that ought to have been fixed right away by Obama. Hillary is not talking about it (people don’t care, and she would just lose support from the most powerful plutos in NY).


          • brodix Says:

            As you say, it an idea on shaky logical ground. The Chinese worship their ancestors, which is the sense of the spirit running through life, not atheism, per se.

            While tweeks to the system might satisfy convention, we are getting sucked into the abyss again and it will peel the face of civilization in its own fashion, as usual.



          • Patrice Ayme Says:

            Is that Scientia Salon Massimo’s famous “cheers” when he informs me he has no idea whatsoever what I talked about, and besides I am *this* close to be banned for insolence and snide remarks somewhere on the Internet? 😉


  2. dominique deux Says:

    As far as scary words from lovely lips go, nothing will ever beat the lovely, intelligent, criminally corrupt Condoleeza Rice with her “‘Punish France, Ignore Germany, Forgive Russia'” sound bite.
    France pictured Condi in thigh high boots and nothing else, and blew its collective wad! (excuse my French)


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      The hostility directed towards France by Anglo-Saxon plutocrats and their friendly fleas is directly tied to the fact France and the USA were founded as sister republics. France is always what the USA could be, a real threat to USA plutocracy.

      One could easily tweak the French and USA governances to get major improvements, by bringing each closer to the other. (And not forgetting to tax the wealthiest 90%! As under FDR, Truman, Ike… Or at least 65% as under JFK.)


      • brodix Says:

        Haven’t France and Germany balanced each other, the light and the dark and now the dark is in the US.

        It seems to me politics is about people and there are more fundamental forces at work.


        • gmax Says:

          Patrice has insisted that the German “Dark” was enabled, and even enticed, by the “Dark” from the USA.

          For example, the closest adviser to U.S. President Wilson proposed a MILITARY Alliance to the Kaiser, in the Kaiser’s office in Berlin, June 1, 1914. That was exactly two months before the German ATTACK on the world.

          Then of course major American Pluto cats were all and everything to Hitler, even in MILITARY matters, starting in 1936, when Hitler attacked Spain.

          So Nazi Dark was all about American Dark, especially when considering the racism and holocaust, both of which Nazi loved, and tried to copy. I mean, they talked about it, on the record. Couldn’t be clearer.

          Hitler gave instructions to not irritate Americans, as America was naturally Nazi. He said.


          • brodix Says:

            Think of it as energy radiating out and structure coalescing inward.
            With France and Germany, it’s more of a cultural dichotomy. France is on the edge of the continent and has a much more radiant cultural history, while Germany is central to Europe, with a much more conservative culture. So after the economic collapse, of the depression, it imploded into a tribal vortex.
            America, on the other hand, is a much more shallow and economically centered culture, where people are more concerned with”getting ahead,” than connections to a larger culture and the tribal affiliations tend to be to historic communities.
            So the for the plutocrats in America it is much more a function of economic dominance, not organically leading a group.
            Hitler and the Nazis were not out to just acquire wealth, but direct power over the people, without much in the way of connections to the old leadership culture, so along with appealing to deep cultural impulses, they also needed the economic control.
            What should be kept in mind are these are a natural dichotomy in society, the expansion of social energies and the civil consolidation holding them together. It is when they get out of control and either tear a society apart, as everyone goes in different directions, or sucks it into the vortex of a political black hole, that the problems get out of hand.


  3. brodix Says:

    I can’t ban you from your own site!
    More like the world is seriously going to hell in a hand basket and no one seems to like my brilliant(src) ideas for saving it.
    Basically I’m just fishing for feedback, but you are more into your own agenda and it’s your site.
    Maybe I should put up my own site, but I don’t have the patience to talk to myself.



    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I don’t have an agenda. I just address difficult questions, even if they are terrible.


      • brodix Says:

        I didn’t mean it as a self centered intent. In my view, an agenda is what gets one out of bed in the morning.
        You do an admirable job of taking the world to task. Personally I suppose I’m just more cynical, in that even those with billions of dollars to throw at their efforts, the Gates and Bloombergs, etc, can do no more than stir a few ripples. It is all rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
        My only interest is trying to put some ideas up for discussion as to how humanity will move on from there. That, pathetic as it may sound, is my agenda.
        Do I take it seriously. At some level, yes, but not to get carried away about it, because it seems the more I just study, the more I see and the further the world crumbles.
        I may be inconsequential, but I seem as connected as anyone. If you want plutocrats, my mother was a Warfield from Maryland. And not one of the poor ones.
        My father was a classmate of GHW Bush, at Andover. Various ancestors have been involved in a lot of the history of this country. A John Merryman won the deed to the land my farm is on in 1714, having moved up from what is now Baltimore, though most of the intervening generations lived a few miles south. My mothers family has been in Howard county about as long.
        Which is to say that while no one is going to listen to me, I have grown up in a situation where I felt the need to understand what is happening and if that is all it amounts to, that’s the way it is.
        Life is journey and we need to keep our eyes open.


        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Nice to know you have a … solid background, John. The concept of “plutocrat”, in my book, require the will to rule with satanic methods. So wealth does not absolutely necessarily make one a plutocrat. Nor does poverty allows one to necessarily avoid that status (a poor, but evil general certainly qualifies; Himmler was a plutocrat, so was Reinhart Heydrich, Stalin… And Saint Louis or Saint Cyril…)

          Where is your farm?

          BTW, I think the great will you have to use physics as a source of analogies or metaphors, is a good idea. And sometimes you hit it on the nail. I just think you should look a bit to more to the book “Physics For the Enquiring Mind”… It’s probably very out of print…

          We could do like seals and use bristles to detect vibrations… In the water.


          • brodix Says:

            I suppose I really am more into sociology, but just that when things start to get too complicated, I try to recognize the broader, though often subtle energies and patterns. So it is not so much complex physics, as being like that seal and sensing the environment and not just the trends du jour.

            The farm is in Sparks, Maryland, which is about twenty miles north of Baltimore City and just a few miles past the more developed suburbia. It was much more countryside when I was a kid.
            My nephew put up a farm facebook page;
            More his view of it, but the general idea.


  4. brodix Says:


    I agree my physics knowledge is a combination of popular books and personal experience and I can understand this doesn’t get me into the conversation, but shouldn’t the issue be about the ideas and not the pedigree?
    For instance, physics does treat time as just a measure of duration, in its philosophy of “shut up and calculate.” Yet can’t even explain why it is asymmetric.
    The dynamic of academia is to keep building on the human knowledge base and that involves taking what came before and adding to it. Yet consider how that works for designing computers, where the original operating system is necessarily primitive and is then patched, until it reaches the point where it is better to just pitch the old model and start over.
    Given the extent to which cosmology is covered in increasingly bizarre patches and various of the primary efforts in basic physics, such as supersymmetry and strings, are coming up empty, it does seem there is a need for re-evaluation.
    The very first Foundational Questions Institute essay contest asked what is the nature of time and it had various big names entering. Julian Barbour won.
    So if you would want something to read, skim some of these essays and see just how confusing even such a basic issue as the question of time is.
    Nautilus is doing the topic of water this month and that offers up some good examples of how little is known about something as basic as that.
    Which isn’t to say I don’t have much to learn, but then we are all very limited in what we can individually know and group consensus isn’t infallible either.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I just look at the ideas. Some of your ideas are on the spot. Others, far off, contradicting what’s known for sure (aka science). But that’s OK with me. The positive is more important. Especially when so many physicists have gone off the deep end.


  5. brodix Says:


    I’m quite willing to accept that I’m wrong. It certainly wouldn’t be a first time. I’m just trying to figure out how and why. Even Massimo grudgingly agreed that cause precedes determination.

    Several days ago, I was in a conversation on Aeon and someone made the point of Alan Watts using the analogy of a boat and its wake to describe time. That the wake, the past, doesn’t direct the boat/present, the boat creates the wake and it is just descriptive.

    As it is, physics has this four dimensional spacetime, in which many, if not most physicists subscribe to some version of block time, either of the strictly deterministic, or some softer version, such as George Ellis puts forth.

    All based on the assumption of time as that narrative along which the present moves from past to future.

    It’s not like it’s just physics, as narrative is the basis of history and thus civilization.

    For most of human existence, we thought of the sun as moving across the sky, from east to west and we still perceive it that way. Though we now understand it is an effect of the earth spinning west to east.

    So, hey, maybe I am beating a dead horse and there really is that “fabric of spacetime” and one day we will be able to time travel through wormholes, but I’m not holding my breath. I just want someone to explain why, other than tell me to go read a textbook, because unless they have a text book that’s different from all the others, it is going to boil down to time is a measure of duration.

    Duration is just the state of the present, as those events come and go. Tomorrow becomes yesterday because the earth turns.


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: