Obama Sees A “Cult Of Death”. At Last!

Obama went to the Oval Office for the third time ever, to deliver a speech about Islam. He said things we have heard before. He said Americans should reject discrimination (nothing G. W. Bush did not say before). However, he did not just parrot Bush. Obama, said new things, things conventional media was anxious to not notice. Obama spoke, and condemned, what he called the … “Cult of Death”. Obama has identified a new cult, the “Cult of Death“.

Obama said the California terrorists had “…gone down the dark path of radicalization“… Indeed. Radical comes from the Late Latin radicalis “of or having roots”. And what are these roots? Should not we search for these evil roots, so we can unroot them? Should not that be an ardent desire to fight off “radicalization”? Why don’t we want to identify the roots?

Preaching Death Or Aggression Threats Can Make A Religion, But Humanity Is In The Way

Preaching Death Or Aggression Threats Can Make A Religion, But Humanity Is In The Way

There are 1.2 billion Muslims around the world, one cannot say they can feel “isolated”. Talking about discrimination against the world’s largest (practiced) religion, is silly. (By comparison, there are only a three hundred thousands Zoroastrian, a religion Islam destroyed; there are also only 2,000 Samaritans left; the famous “Samaritans” in the Bible).

So what’s the problem with Islam? It is not just a religion, but it has the pretension to be a law onto itself, and all of society. And all of this for “Submission”… to so-called “God”, a sort of Charlie Manson with several books He supposedly dictated to His followers, or “messengers”. And what does that so-called “God” wants?

Islam’s basic set-up, borrowed from Judeo-Christianism, is that God will destroy the world in the Apocalypse, and then proceed with the Last Judgment. Islam adds two twists: all Jews have to be killed first, and those who killed categories prescribed by Allah, will not be judged, but go to Paradise without further ado. This explains why true believers are anxious to be martyred. Here are quotes from the Qur’an. First number is the Sura, the second the verse therein.

2:94 Say: If the abode of the Hereafter in the providence of Allah is indeed for you alone and not for the rest of humanity (as you pretend), then long for death if you are truthful.

2:95 But they will never long for it, because of that which their own hands have sent before them. Allah is aware of evil-doers.
2:96 And thou wilt find them [the Jews] greediest of mankind for life and (greedier) than the idolaters. (Each) one of them would like to be allowed to live a thousand years. And to live (a thousand years) would be no means remove them from the doom. Allah is Seer of what they do.


14:2 Allah, unto Whom belongeth whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth. and condemns the disbelievers to an awful doom;

14:3 Those who love the life of the world more than the Hereafter, and hinder others from the way of Allah and would have it crooked: such are far astray.

The Qur’an is only 80,000 words. It is complemented by the Sunna and the Hadith. The later reports other pronouncements by the Prophet (aka “Messenger” of God). Peace Be Upon Him (as He obviously needs it, being obviously in a state of murderous agitation!)

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 4.54,  Narrated by Abu Huraira:               

 The Prophet said, “By Him in Whose Hands my life is! Were it not for some men amongst the believers who dislike to be left behind me and whom I cannot provide with means of conveyance, I would certainly never remain behind any Sariya’ (army-unit) setting out in Allah’s cause. By Him in Whose Hands my life is! I would love to be martyred in Allah’s cause and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred and then get resurrected again and then get martyred.”

Back to the Commander In Chief, ex-sycophant of Islam:

…”we are cooperating with Muslim majority countries and with our Muslim communities here at home to counter the vicious ideology that ISIL promotes online. ” says Obama. Could he be a bit more specific? Does this “vicious ideology” have a name? He adds:

“We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That, too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers. Part of a cult of death. And they account for a tiny fraction of a more than a billion Muslims around the world, including millions of patriotic Muslim-Americans who reject their hateful ideology.”

Could Obama explains how he knows the Islamist State is not a State of Islamism? How does the “cult of death” Obama speaks of has to do with Osama’s famous (and fundamentally stupid) assertion that “we will win because we love death more than you love life!” How to read the Qur’an correctly? Said the President:

“That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some Muslim communities. It’s a real problem that Muslims must confront without excuse.

Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups like ISIL and Al Qaeda promote. To speak out against not just acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.

But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization,”

In other words, Obama promotes the Cult of Man against the Qur’an as it is (FAITHFULLY!) read by the Islamist State. Obama wants “Muslims” to forget their roots (radix in Latin). And embrace the Cult of Man. In other words, invent a new Islam, different from the one the Islamist State reads in the Qur’an. It can be done, but what it should entail ought to be discussed more.

The West has been founded as the cult of man. The West does not take orders from “God”. We are the Gods.

Considering this, the West cannot tolerate literal Islam, anymore than the reciprocal. This is a fight to death, and those who love death more, will, one may presume, die more readily than those who love life more, as human beings, and even dogs, have evolved to feel. Life has the cult of life, perverts, the cult of death.

Patrice Ayme’

17 Responses to “Obama Sees A “Cult Of Death”. At Last!”

  1. Andrej Dekleva Says:


    Can you please answer your own question – in light of Trump’s proposed closing off US borders to Muslims: “Trump versus Obama: Is it better to speak off the cuff, or off the teleprompter? what’s most genuine, authentic, sincere, from the heart?”


  2. Andrej Dekleva Says:

    … and while we’re at it, what do we make of FN getting real votes in France?


    • Gmax Says:

      What you are saying is that OBAMA CALLED ISLAM A ‘CULT OF DEATH’. That’s indeed clearly Obama’s not so SUBLIMINAL message! WOW! LOOKS like he is reading this blog


    • Gmax Says:

      Sorry Andrej, I was writing a general comment, not answering you. Put it in wrong place.
      To answer you, the French are mad as hell, and rightly so. Same in America. So people vote for politicians who are mad as hell. Best


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Coming soon. Incredibly, some will say, I view this as a good development.

      Although I am a rabid leftist, determined pro-European fanatic, and pro-immigration, the disgusting way in which European peoples are treated has got to stop. Consider the ECB last Thursday, where Goldman Sachs decided Europe should stay in misery… So I am not against the rise of “nationalist” parties… In Poland or France (although Poles should not spit on the EU while getting subsidies…)


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      FN has long got real votes, but the (non “proportional”) voting system insured that it would not have representation.


  3. Chris Snuggs Says:

    ‘The West has been founded as the cult of man. The West does not take orders from “God”. We are the Gods.’

    Chris Snuggs: Some might take orders from a god, but one chosen by them, not one forced upon them by a totalitarian cult of death.


  4. Chris Snuggs Says:

    Keep it up, Patrice! The worm is turning slowly …..


  5. tom Says:

    I do recall a certain predecessor of President Obama calling islam ‘religion of peace’.(obviously all others are less peaceful). Needless to say all regimes bring ‘peace’ once they exterminate all opposition… Furthermore the West has been extremely lax when moslems were doing much nastier things than when non-moslems have been doing much smaller, if at all, offenses. Examples:
    -Wilders/Le Pen prosecuted for voicing their opinion vs various imams not prosecuted for much worse opinions or incitement to hate and crime.
    -political correctness applied to everybody BUT islam
    -tolerance for saria law in Europe(even marriages of underage girls when sanctioned by an imam), i.e. effectively suspension of European law as if it did not apply to citizens who are moslems.
    -80 day bombing of Yugoslavia(who attacked nobody) vs pressure on Israel NOT to bomb in self-defence
    -blind eye to Turkey’s many crimes
    -treatment of South Africa for apartheid. Which islamic country has treated non-moslems any better? At least S.Africa never had head tax like Egypt did (mind you I’m not defending apartheid-just pointing out the hugely different standard)

    In my view this tolerance -which was ‘justified’ to get contracts with such countries- has made ‘islamic values’ at odds with the values of the rest of the world more acceptable


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear Tom:
      Sorry about delay in answering, I have much to do!
      It’s true the prosecutions of Wilders and Le Pen were astounding. Le Pen was prosecuted, one should say, persecuted, after her European Deputy IMMUNITY was lifted by the European Parliament (she has been found no guilty, after years of procedure). The future president of France (?) had expressed displeasure at having Muslims take over the streets to pray. Some pictures show that Muslims were not densely arrayed, and the fact they did not have space to pray, was just an excuse to flaunt the fact that they did not have to respect the law.

      Dieudonne’ has been condemned (in Belgium, a place with no government for years) for incitation to hatred. However there are so-called “Imams” (everybody can be an imam: no institution certifies one!), on tape, saying abominable things, straight out to schoolchildren (sent on a school trip!). If an “Imam” preaches physical aggression by claiming “God” ordered to do so, he should do some SERIOUS time in jail. After the Charlie Hebdo attack, the government of PM tough-guy Valls did nothing (except for going with his sons in the Republic’s jet to see soccer in Berlin). No mosque closed, no Imam jailed, and just a couple of guys stripped of French nationality.

      The “Yugoslav” affair (not really “Yugoslav” as Slovenia and Croatia were already independent) was eminently regrettable, and the hostilities that French forces had to engage against some Serbian elements came with a heavy heart (considering WWI, WWII, etc.) But now it’s history, the page is turned, hopefully Serbia can join the EU soon.

      Reading what Muhammad (aka “God”) said about the Romans, in the Qur’an, one realizes Islam is just a way of war.

      Obama also said Islam was about peace, because he does not know all the peaceful aspects were ABROGATED by Sura 5, Verse 9 (among others).

      Any doctor of the Islamist faith (aka, “Islam”) knows very well that Islam is NOT compatible with Civilization, the Cult of Man.

      So why was Islam promoted?
      Not just for oil. Not just for contracts as you suggest. Not just to make the Middle East weak, stupid and divided.

      There was a very advanced Machiavellianism at work: respecting Islam destroys civilization. For plutocracy to reign, civilization needs to be destroyed. Therefore plutocracy loves Islam. And Islam’s intrinsic Fascist Principle (Sura 4, Verse 59) makes it intrinsically fascist, thus a form of plutocracy.


  6. tom Says:

    Hello Patrice,
    sure flooding the civilized world with poorly educated, easily manipulated cheap labor is good for plutocracy in the short run. But in the long run this easily manipulated cheap labor is much more easily manipulated by the imams than by the plutocrats, which means the end of the (western) plutocrats along with the rest of civilization. Machiavelli at least was intelligent and understood self-interest. This type of Machiavellianism is suicidal.
    Given that, it is no surprise that self-preservation kicks in and what is called ‘far-right’ rises(though the term is abused as I am not sure exactly what is far-right for Wilders or M. Le Pen(in contrast to he dad, with whom I understand she has legal battles and he has been expelled from her party): I mean they respect democracy and do not engage in illegal activities as far as I know.
    Last, on the double standards, it’s not just Yugoslavia where NATO troops effectively fought with Al Queda in Bosnia and KLA in Kossovo(why KLA is acceptable and say kurdish PKK which is not involved in drug and organ trade and trafficing is not is very hard to understand). Another example was the Mavi Marmara where Israel was pressured to apologize for its soldiers defending themselves when attacked by armed islamists while Turkey has yet to apologize, much less comply with the Interpol warrant to turn in the grey wolves and other paramilitary scum who murdered two unarmed civillians who were attacking NOTHING in the Cyprus buffer zone. Or Copts paying head tax n Egypt (no guarantee that they will keep their heads tough!). Or tolerance for marriages of underage moslem girls IN EUROPE and huge penalties for child molestation for everyone else as if moslems are above the law or subject to a different law. The list is very long.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Why Islamism has been tolerated so long is the inertia of a logic. That logic was anti-French (and thus anti-European). It was left to fester, as it advantaged the USA (and the USSR) for very long. So a whole generation of “French” “intellectuals” learned to revere the “Little Father of the Peoples”, Stalin, and that advantaged Uncle Sam (see Suez/Hungary invasion, 1956).
      Those “French Theorists” led generations of politicians who played the same game.
      So now French money is controlled by a Goldman Sachs partner (as even the Brits would not tolerate), and that system was put in place by French “Socialists”. The EU, as built, is less socialist than the USA.

      As more and more French discover these lies, the probability of Marine Le Pen to become president goes up. She is less to the right than Bill, or Hilary Clinton, BTW, and the individuals who set-up Goldman Sachs as commander of the “European” Central Bank are hardly in position to accuse HER of being “extreme right” (because what are they then?)


      • tom Says:

        Although a number of people on the left have sympathies to ‘poor, exploited’ but deeply believing moslems, I find it extremely hard to reconsile leftist ideas (‘religion is the opium of the people’) with such sympathies. Makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever. It makes equally no sense to ardent capitalists/neoliberals/plutocrats also being for immigration , no questions asked, thus importing their worst enemies. Maybe the answer to the puzzle is ‘never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity’, on both sides o the spectrum.


        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          One should analyze the fall of the Roman State in the West. The same patterns are at work now in the EU, complete with the betrayal by clueless, greedy, power hungry, Politically Correct (pseudo) “philosophers”.

          Roman plutocrats preferred barbarians to taxes.
          So plutocrats built themselves an EU which would protect them, and them alone.
          I have a related essay just out.


  7. Happy New Year, Pluto! | Patrice Ayme's Thoughts Says:

    […] of democracy, and the richest place we are still indebted to. But now it’s all gore, and Cult of Death. Verily, Pluto has much to thank […]


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: