Judicial Dictator Scalia Was A Plutocrat

The Commoners who are the first victims of plutocracy, have a very restricted notion of what “plutocracy” means. (And this is precisely this dearth of imagination and knowledge which explains why they got enslaved so easily!) The Commoners, in the naivety characteristic of their inferior class, believe that plutocracy has just to do with money. How silly. Not at all. Money is just a possible tool. In truth, plutocracy has to do with killing. This is what evolution says. And evolution is our one and only True God, The One who made us, in our image.

I will show the satanic aspect of plutocracy in the particular case of “Justice” Antonin Scalia, a recently diseased plutocrat in robe. Scalia had the demonic power, he did not need to express it through the colossal amounts of money the hundreds of billions of dollars controlled by the Gates and Walton families. Scalia managed, and imposed evil, directly.

Plutocracy is, etymologically speaking, truly the rule of Pluto, the rule of the God of Hell. What is money? How to have power onto other people. A better way to have power, is to eliminate the intermediary medium, and have power directly. Scalia had this direct power. And the enjoyable, extremely high income lifestyle of the extremely rich and famous to go with it.

Bush's Head Was Photoshopped. But the Rest of the Picture With Scalia In It Is Authentic. Plutocracy Is All About Killing, Such Is My Thesis

Bush’s Head Was Photoshopped. But the Rest of the Picture With Scalia In It Is Authentic. Plutocracy Is All About Killing, Such Is My Thesis

It turns out (see below) that Scalia was all about private jets and global, multi-centuries old secret societies (as I have long alleged). This subject has long been broached here: I have questioned the wealth of some members of the Supreme Court, considering their relatively modest salaries (many in Obama’s government are immensely rich, and became so, after getting in that “democratic” president’s administration; Peter Orszag, Obama’s budget director for a few month went to Citigroup, and now has been named to the French bank Lazard. Orszag knows how to zig zag in the worldwide plutocracy; Obama’s National Security Adviser has made millions, holding mostly government positions…). The most powerful men have absolutely no qualms. Some of the most powerful men in the world belong to American clubs which still outlaw women!

Says the Wall Street Journal (the well known leftist publication I get my ideas from):

“Mr. Orszag is among a large number of former Washington insiders who have left the Beltway for Wall Street.

The former House majority leader, Eric Cantor, joined boutique investment bank Moelis & Co. in late 2014, after he lost his Virginia Congressional seat in a Republican primary. In February 2015, he opened an office for the bank in Washington.

Last year, former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke took on roles at both Pacific Investment Management Co. and the Chicago-based hedge fund Citadel LLC.

Pimco also brought in former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, Mr. Bernanke’s predecessor, as an adviser to the firm from 2007 to 2011.

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, one of the architects of the federal government’s rescue of the financial system, joined the private-equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC in 2013.

In 2013, KKR & Co. tapped David Petraeus, the former general and Central Intelligence Agency chief, to lead an internal team focused on macroeconomic forecasting and public policy.

Former Vice President Dan Quayle and former Treasury Secretary John Snow work for Cerberus Capital Management LP. Carlyle Group has enlisted many officials from the Bush and Clinton administrations, including former Secretary of State James Baker III, in advisory roles.

Unlike Citigroup, Lazard does not have the so-called SIFI designation, and because of that, Lazard is subject to less government supervision.  The “SIFI” label, which was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, comes with stricter oversight by the Federal Reserve.”

Don’t you think all these plutocrats making hundreds of millions of dollars a year, if not billions, do not have a vague feeling that they are engaged in some sort of malfeasance? They do, thus they contrive to feel otherwise, by twisting their souls into knots. Hence our great leaders are not just vivaciously vicious, they are insane.

Plutocracy is the rule of the worst instincts and inclinations, imposed on We The People. Money is just a facilitator.

Hence, to be a plutocrat, one does not need money, necessarily. What a plutocrat needs is power onto others, and the ability to impose it to rule over the multitudes as if they were squashable critters. The very nature of the US Supreme Court endows a few with tremendous powers, for life, without checks and balances. This is obviously anti-democratic. (The framers of the Constitution thought of the Supreme Court as the ultimate superior court, not the Constitutional Court it has become; European Constitutional Courts, as in France, have checks and balances that SCOTUS does not have. They have been used.)

In the Roman Republic, the highest judicial officers were the Consuls. Their term was for a year, but they had supreme power only one month at a time. Scalia, in comparison, was a sort of judicial dictator named for life. That made him crucial to the rest of the private jet set, and his friends among it, were many. How does travelling for free in the best style, enjoying the best accommodations, for free, differ from blatant corruption? This is way worse than the FIFA (soccer scandal). Why is there no prosecution?

With the SCOTUS ruling known as “Citizens United”, which said corporations are moral persons entitled to spend as much money as they want to mold public opinion, in political matters, such as elections, Scalia empowered further his fellow plutocrats, and this awesome inheritance should make him forever honored among his satanic conspirators. Saint Scalia, plutocrat in a black robe, just like the emperor in Star Wars.

Now for some of the juicy facts just revealed about overlord Scalia. This partisan of the death penalty died as he lived. Among our superiors. From the Washington Post:

Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters:

“When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died 12 days ago at a West Texas ranch, he was among high-ranking members of an exclusive fraternity for hunters called the International Order of St. Hubertus, an Austrian society that dates back to the 1600s.

After Scalia’s death Feb. 13, the names of the 35 other guests at the remote resort, along with details about Scalia’s connection to the hunters, have remained largely unknown. A review of public records shows that some of the men who were with Scalia at the ranch are connected through the International Order of St. Hubertus, whose members gathered at least once before at the same ranch for a celebratory weekend.

Members of the worldwide, male-only society wear dark-green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto “Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes,” which means “Honoring God by honoring His creatures,” according to the group’s website. Some hold titles, such as Grand Master, Prior and Knight Grand Officer. The Order’s name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

30 Responses to “Judicial Dictator Scalia Was A Plutocrat”

  1. Patrice Ayme Says:

    The corruption is official and even presidential in the so-called leading country, the USA. Obama spent months of his presidency literally sleeping with the plutocrats. At least so he did until I pointed that out to him. Then he left the plutocratic mansions for the hotel, but still had these $37,500 per person breakfast. I have seen small children attending.

    • Ian Miller Says:

      ianmillerblog
      on February 25, 2016 at 7:45 pm Ian said:

      The problem with the sort of corruption you refer to is that the participants do not consider it bad, as shown buy the fact they make no effort to hide it. The breakfast price is ridiculous.

      • Patrice Ayme Says:

        Ultimately, corruption affects the logical centers. Advanced plutocracy is when tax evading corrupt and corrupting monopolists thieves are viewed as “job creators” and “philanthropists”, and are spoken about as if they were secular saints. Crooks who cook books need to be hooked and booked, not praised and lionized

  2. Andrej Dekleva Says:

    I’m surprised you can still get worked-up about this, it has been mostly worse through our history as far as corruption and power, distribution of wealth – what can one expect coming from descendants of Habsburgs, etc… and to think that secret societies have any power left is a bit silly – seems more like a masquerade for the clinically conservative.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      The case of Scalia illustrates what I mean by “plutocrat”, in the generalized sense. And by generalized corruption. Scalia was a corrupt plutocrat, illustration. Today’s secret society are Facebook/NSA/Google, etc.
      Fact is people do not guess, did not guess, their great “justices” are jetting around with plutocrats around the world. I gave other examples with other judges in the past.

  3. Andrej Dekleva Says:

    … also the ‘we the people’ is quite quaint by now, no?

  4. Gmax Says:

    Is there a method to the madness? Andrej says you are ‘worked up’, but is not all of this illustrative of your general theory of plutocracy? Didn’t Michel Foucault tend towards a similar theory of “micropower” or whatever he called it?

    Also the Bohemian Club is the place which excludes women, they have a giant land north of San Francisco, with like 100 camps inside. I have run in the area for years, before LV. Still does sometimes.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Yes, Foucault generalized the notions pertaining to applications of power. I differ both in detail and extend. My extent is much more extensive, but some of Foucault’s obsessions were just paranoiac.

  5. Darko Mulej Says:

    Today’s NYTimes agrees with you on this🙂
    I still wonder why they don’t allow commnets on all articles?!

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      The New York Times has so far CENSORED ALL my comments on Scalia. In my experience, one of the reasons is that they steal the ideas therein. Indeed, before censoring, they read. I often have the dubious pleasure to see the same ideas appearing there after a while, from one day to ten years (Nota bene: I have talked to NYT editors, more than ten years ago, on related subjects.)

      As I am a philosopher, what I try to do is to make humanity’s thinking progress. If that goes through with the trick of stealing my ideas, so be it. I have seen it in both mathematics and physics, long ago. (Some of my three most iconoclastic ideas, finiteness in math, non-locality and black holes detailed physics have all been lifted, as far as I can see).

      Never mind. Thieves rule. All we can do, is make them more sustainable.

  6. Paul Handover Says:

    What a terrible world we all live in. Always has been. The difference now is that awareness of our world is so much better. Just in time to witness the ‘end game ‘. Unless we are extraordinarily lucky.

    This is the moment in time when the American people need to worry less about whether the new administration will be ‘left’ or ‘right’ but more, critically more, about whether the next Government will be good. By good I mean act with integrity.

    We are all drinking at the last chance saloon!

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Well, the next president is going to be one of four (T, R, C, HRC). An unsavory bunch. I think HCR will lose, whichever republican is chosen. Both Cruz and trump could run to the left of Clinton in some ways. It’s that bad.

      In general, we have to lift our ethics. Scalia, relative to average morality in the Nineteenth Century, was a saint. But he was not good enough, by a long shot, for the 21 C. Not that he was wrong in all ways: he pointed out that SCOTUS was no Constitutional Court (I am rephrasing). Congress should make clearer laws, he said. In truth, the USA needs a CONSTITUTIONAL COURT…

      More generally, the spirit of plutocracy is now pandemic. Thieves rule, they always tend to. All we can do, is make them more sustainable. For us and the planet.

      • Paul Handover Says:

        You don’t see Sanders even getting close?

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Unfortunately, no. The Main Stream Media (MSM) has occulted the inequality problem as a destroyer of the economy, and the concept of plutocracy as a destroyer of civilization. That Chelsea “made” more than 15 million dollars, and her parents more than ten times that, is viewed as good business. Truman (a US president, would have see it as demeaning to the office of the presidency (his exact words), and, in the case of the Clinton, sheer corruption. Hillary is personally corrupt (she played commodities when her husband was att. general and impacted markets).

          If I were god, I would push a button, and make Sanders president. But I don’t believe in god. When some so-called democrats believe Trump is way worse than Clinton, they are delusional. Arguably, Bill Clinton was the president who made inequality worse than any other US president, ever. Including Tricky Dick and Reagan. But the so-called “minorities” have not noticed. Because they repeat the MSM like brainless parrots.

        • Gmax Says:

          Clinton chewed up Sanders, thx to the blacks

  7. Stephane Gaudette Says:

    Patrice said; ‘Advanced plutocracy? When tax evading corrupting monopolists thieves are viewed as “job creators”, “philanthropists”, secular saints.’
    Stephane Gaudette: The job creators are the middle class that buy goods

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Indeed. This is exactly why the world economy is not working well: the plutocrats have stolen the middle class, to the point that demand has collapsed. So we are heading back to the Middle Ages.

  8. picard578 Says:

    On a somewhat related note, Patrice, are you familiar with this?

    http://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/list-of-banks-owned-by-the-rothschild-family.51601/

    I found it while doing some research for the article I’m working on right now (has nothing to do with banks, but everything to do with plutocracy).

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      One has to be careful about what “owns” mean. Central Banks’ nature vary. On the Fed, big banks have a (huge, way to big) say. They sit on the governing board, supposedly non voting on some issues, etc… Financial plutocrats were unleashed by Clinton in the 1990s, by gutting the “Banking Act of 1933” (“Glass-Seagal”). Now they are in command, Rothschild or not. Remark: the French economy minister made a colossal fortune at Rothschild France, he is in his 30s… French PM and President Pompidou had started the same.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      One has to be careful about what “owns” mean. Central Banks’ nature vary. On the Fed, big banks have a (huge, way to big) say. They sit on the governing board, supposedly non voting on some issues, etc… Financial plutocrats were unleashed by Clinton in the 1990s, by gutting the “Banking Act of 1933” (“Glass-Seagal”). Now they are in command, Rothschild or not. Remark: the French economy minister made a colossal fortune at Rothschild France, he is in his 30s… French PM and President Pompidou had started the same.

      • Partha Shakkottai Says:

        Hi Patrice: The Reserve Bank of India was established on April 1, 1935 in accordance with the provisions of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
        The Central Office of the Reserve Bank was initially established in Calcutta but was permanently moved to Mumbai in 1937. The Central Office is where the Governor sits and where policies are formulated.

        Though originally privately owned, since nationalisation in 1949, the Reserve Bank is fully owned by the Government of India.
        Partha

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Yes, thanks Partha. Half of the directors of the Fed, or so, are heads of “private” banks. In the USA, it’s not clear where private ends and public starts…

  9. Patrice Ayme Says:

    Quick answer to Andrej and Gmax: the world security system rests on the UN Security Council (UNSC). The UNSC in turn rests on the 5 permanent members, the VICTORS of World War Two.

    This is why the USA, China, Russia, the UK and France are not normal superpowers and need to be scrutinized. All the time.

    They are the ultimate enforcers of the Geneva Convention, etc.

    Interventions in Libya, the Balkans, or Korea were made possible only because the UNSC voted that way.

    (France uses the UNSC all the time, as all her interventions are validated by the UNSC, often at posteriori, as recently in Mali and Ivory Coast, or, in the 1990s, in Bosnia.)

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: