Rousseau’s Infamy


Jean-Jacques Rousseau famously started his treatise “The Social Contract” with: “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains. One man thinks himself the master of others, but remains more of a slave than they are.”

Rousseau claimed that man was naturally good but became corrupted by the pernicious influence of human society and institutions. French sailors implemented Rousseau philosophy in Tasmania: they went swimming in the nude, to show the natives they had nothing to fear. Hundreds of Natives attacked the French, who gathered a vivid impression of Rousseau’s wickedness.

Rousseau’s beautiful tweet is only true as a poetic metaphor, a helpful bleating to a despondent sky. Otherwise, it is erroneous in roughly all ways. Man is not born free, but fatally dependent upon others, and especially lactating human female(s). (Until very recent technological developments.) The one who thought of himself as the master often was, or is, really the master, whose very mind had been made by an ideology of mastery. And thus, cannot be otherwise. Even more surely than Rousseau advanced by seducing judiciously chosen wealthy women. (Say Jean-Jacques: “To write a good love letter, you ought to begin without knowing what you mean to say, and to finish without knowing what you have written.”)

I Strike, Therefore You Die. Nature Is Not About Goodness, Just Balance

I Strike, Therefore You Die. Nature Is Not About Goodness, Just Balance

[Natural Quantum Supercomputer At Work. The latest on rattlesnakes show them capable of foresight and engineering, in preparation for a strike… a few hours later.]

As New Scientist puts it, April 13, 2016: “It’s a premeditated attack. A deadly rattlesnake seems to be planning attacks by clearing a path for its strike in advance.

Northern Pacific rattlesnakes (Crotalus oreganus) have been filmed manipulating vegetation near the burrows of ground squirrels. It’s the first time they have been captured on video moving grass in such a way, says Breanna Putman at San Diego State University in California.

Putman and her colleague Rulon Clark recorded two instances of hunting rattlesnakes pushing away grass around them at the Blue Oak Ranch Reserve in California’s Santa Clara County.”

If rattlesnakes can premeditate and prepare their deadly attacks, so can humans. (In particular, plutocrats.)

Chains, around ankles, are a rare sight. Yet ideologies, stunting minds, are common. Actually, the word “ideology” comes short: minds go deeper than ideas. Ideas are anchored in moods. Mentalities are ecosystems for ideas. Rousseau’s basic axiomatic mood, anchoring his entire critique, was anti-civilizational. (He got carried away from the Ancient Regime, not understanding that was not civilization, but plutocracy run amok.)

Rousseau preached returning to nature to live a natural life at peace with neighbors and self. He heaped scorn on civilization: “Civilization is a hopeless race to discover remedies for the evils it produces…Trust your heart rather than your head… What wisdom can you find greater than kindness… The truth brings no man a fortune… Everything is good as it comes from the hands of the Maker of the world, but degenerates once it gets into the hands of man“.

Returning to nature is fundamental, agreed, because that is where the deepest structures of our minds come from. Yet lives in the wild were short, brutish, and cruel. Civilization is a remedy for nature.

We are made, evolutionarily speaking to handle the short, brutish and cruel. Paradoxically this may be what is missing now. Instead, we are slowly been overheated like the proverbial frog in an increasingly torrid bath.

Similarly, too much politeness can kill a proper debate. Calling fools and their stupid ideologies for what they are is a preliminary requirement to think correctly.

Even more paradoxically, politeness can be a diabolical weapon against those who do not expect it, especially our greatest enemies. Had I met Bin Laden, I would have been polite. I would have asked what exactly happened. Bin Laden was initially recruited by the CIA and SIA, to lead an Arab mercenary army against the Afghan Republic. The latter initially had a defense accord with the USSR, but also intended to develop Afghan geology with French expertise. All this became impossible as the White House conducted a secret war, using Pakistan. As that was not enough democratic president Carter gave a secret order of attack, July 3, 1979.

So politeness can be appropriate, or not. In the case of Rousseau, the answer was clear. Rousseau sent Voltaire a copy of his “The Social Contract” and Voltaire wrote him the following:

“I have received your new book against the human race, and thank you for it. Never was such a cleverness used in the design of making us all stupid. One longs, in reading your book, to walk on all fours. But as I have lost that habit for more than sixty years, I feel unhappily the impossibility of resuming it. Nor can I embark in search of the savages of Canada, because the maladies to which I am condemned render a European surgeon necessary to me; because war is going on in those regions; and because the example of our actions has made the savages nearly as bad as ourselves.”

De Sade coldly observed that Rousseau had no idea of the nature of nature (paraphrasing). The argument can be made, and has been made, that there is a direct filiation between the philosophers Rousseau and (the quite similar) Herder, and the Prussianized Nazism which disfigured Europe, after Metternich and Bismarck launched their conquering ways.

Voltaire said that “one must crush infamy!”. But infamy is clever. Even rattlesnakes are clever. Just as it was recently documented that a rattlesnake, preparing for an ambush, will clear its strike trajectory, so it is with most thinking beings, and not just predators. Elephants and rhinoceroses have been observed attacking with enormous fury and persistence even innocent calves. Surely, indeed, the nature of nature is not to be strictly cuddly.

In the end, Jean-Jacques himself had to admit the truth: “All my misfortunes come of having thought too well of my fellows“. Well, after behaving all too long like a rattlesnake of love, striking here, and there, lying in ambush… no wonder.

Patrice Ayme’

Tags: , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Rousseau’s Infamy”

  1. Gmax Says:

    Is Rousseau metaphorically compared to a rattler? Did he poison civilization?
    A woman on a beach in California felt a sting like a bee. It was a small rattler, she nearly died. Is it what Rousseau did?

    Like

  2. EugenR Says:

    There is more, homo sapiens evolved from a bipedal creature, homo erectus, who was somewhere in the middle of the food chain, mostly scavenging the leftovers of big predators. It seems it used its skills with stone to break the bones, that even the hyenas couldn’t break. As a relatively weak creature, its main concern wasn’t only about what to eat but also how not to be eaten. It means, constant fear never left him. Then one day the homo sapiens appeared with his cultural social skills, that enabled him to coordinate operation of large group of people. At that day he became a prime predator, without the time evolution needed to adopt the homosapiens to its new position of prime carnivore. Manipulation with this constant fear, inprinted in our gens is the major instrument in the hands of the cruelest political manipulators.

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Predators are clever. When they saw the price an attack on Homo would bring, they learned to stay away.

      Homo Erectus, and some of its predecessors could be huge, above 6 feet tall. My bet is that by two million years ago, just before the switch to Homo Erectus or Ergaster, Homo had risen to apex predator from apex scavenger. Top Homo predation involved precision, intelligent targeting.

      Part of the Homo strategy has been bersekness. Top predators can go bersek, mostly to protect its young, Homo much more so.

      So we differ on what led to what when, but not on the final picture…

      Like

      • EugenR Says:

        It seems, that only with the appearance of homo sapiens and not before that all the big creatures in Euro-Asia and in America Australia as well were extinct, even if they existed in developed homo erectus form more than million years. The homo erectuse used tools and fire more than one and half million years ago. There was homo robustus of relatively big size, but the homo erectus was more successful. The Neanderthals were also big game hunters, but their strategy was probably less devastating to the game. The Mammoths were extinct by homo sapience. Probably because of hunting practices of mass killings. If not the social skills, humanoids are relatively a power less creatures.

        Like

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Neanderthals did in the Cave Bear (most probably). My theory of disappearance of Neanderthals does not depend upon any inferior character on their part. Quite the opposite. Neanderthals were like aircraft carriers who got beached, while the most smaller African Sapiens sailed through.

          MATH “EXTINGUISHED” NEANDERTHALS, Mostly.

          Like

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          I am going to answer this in an essay I am writing: BERSERK…

          The impact of humans has augmented, not because we changed (sub)species, what I would call the racist argument, but because we changed technologies, what I would call the revealing argument…

          Like

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!