DARK MATTER PROPULSION Proposed

In Patrice’s Sub-Quantum Reality (PSQR), Matter Waves are real (in Quantum Theory Copenhagen Interpretation (QTCI) the Matter Waves are just probability waves). There has been no direct evidence that Matter Waves were real. So far. But times they are changing as the other one, who got his Nobel today, said.

Both Dark Matter and Dark Energy are consequences of PSQR. So: Observing both Dark Matter and Dark Energy constitute proofs of PSQR.

The prediction of the deviation of light by the Sun was twice with “General Relativity” than the one predicted in Newtonian Mechanics. The effect was minute, and detected only in grazing starlight, during Solar eclipse of 29 May 1919 (by the ultra famous British astronomer and physicist Eddington). Thus, as 95% of the universe matter-energy is from Dark Matter or Dark Energy, my prediction carries more weight.

PSQR also predict “fuel-less” production, in a variant of the effect which produces Dark Matter in PSQR: 

Dark Matter Pushes, Patrice Ayme Says. Explaining NASA's Findings?

Dark Matter Pushes, Patrice Ayme Says. Explaining NASA’s Findings?

How does Dark Matter create propulsion? Well, that it does is evident: just look at galactic clusters (more details another day). A Matter Wave will expand, until it singularizes. If it expands enough, it will become so big that it will lose a (smaller) piece of itself during re-singularization. That  piece is the Dark Matter.

Thus visualize this: take a cavity C, and bounce a Matter Wave around it (there is plenty of direct theoretical and experimental evidence that this can be arranged).

Make a hole H in the boundary of C (this is not different from the Black Body oven the consideration of which led Planck to discover the Quantum).

Some Dark Matter then escapes. By the hole. 

However, Dark Matter carries energy momentum (evidence from Galaxies, Galactic Clusters, etc.).

Hence a push. A Dark Matter push.

The (spectacular) effect has been apparently observed by NASA.

Does this violate Newton’s Third Law? (As it has been alleged.)

No. I actually just used Newton’s Third Law, the Action = Reaction law. So PSQR explains the observed effect in combination with the Action= Reaction Law, “proving” both.

How could we prove PSQR? There should be a decrease of energy-momentum after a while, and the decrease should equal the observed push exactly.

Patrice Ayme’

***

Warning: The preceding considerations are at the edge of plausible physics. (A tiny group of dissenting physicists are even busy making theories where Dark Matter does not exist. The consensus is that Dark Matter exists, but is explained by a variant of the so-called “Standard Model”, using “Supersymmetry”, or “WIMPs”, or “Axions”. My own theory, PSQR is, by far, the most exotic, as it threws Quantum Theory Copenhagen Interpretation, QTCI, through the window.)

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

8 Responses to “DARK MATTER PROPULSION Proposed”

  1. Gmax Says:

    Supposing that’s true, can we go to the stars?

  2. ianmillerblog Says:

    While I am an advocate for a physical wave, I don’t see how the existence of such a wave perforce generates dark matter and dark energy. You need a little more explanation on this.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I already explained quite a bit in preceding essays.
      Say:
      https://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2016/10/01/dark-galaxy-explained/
      Got to run right now, will be back.
      The essential idea is that the QUANTUM INTERACTION proceeds at FINITE SPEED (not infinite as standard QM has it).
      If such is the case, the collapse has got to give remnants at great distances. That remaining junk is DM, and it weakens gravity at intergalactic distances

      • ianmillerblog Says:

        That the quantum interaction proceeds at finite speed is very sound. Interesting you say this weakens gravity at intergalactic distances. Presumably that means dark energy is merely a reduction in the expected gravity, or have I got the wrong?

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Thanks Ian! Yes, well, right. I am not sure what Dark Energy does, because the basic data is not in yet. As it is, what we know about DE SEEMS compatible with a simple weakening of gravity at intergalactic distance.

          On the other hand, I feel confident about Dark Matter (although there is a noisy group of rebels claiming there is not Dark Matter, and MOdified Newton Dynamics, MOND, or a variant thereof, does it all… Some with a holographic universe (I have no idea what that is… Sounds mysterious enough, though, all this holgraphic stuff…). We increasingly have hard data about DM, and my theory gets it easy.

          I laughed with a physicist this morning that if this is all true Einstein is one millimeter, and the theory above a full yard, and he joked back pretty flattering stuff… Anyway, we will see… Soon…

  3. Contemplating Philosophically Trappist Habitable Planets | Patrice Ayme's Thoughts Says:

    […] effect is real (as it seems), its origin is deep in the foundations of Quantum Physics. (I proposed my own mechanism, Dark Matter Propulsion; researchers at NASA have proposed that the ever mysterious “vacuum energy” is […]

  4. Patrice Ayme Says:

    [Sent to Ian Miller: https://ianmillerblog.wordpress.com/2017/05/03/the-need-for-and-the-problems-of-recycling/%5D

    Number one problem of civilization is clean energy. Really clean energy. PV solar is getting there (although not yet cheap enough, and not available up north!)

    By clean, I don’t mean weak. I meant; much higher energy density AND clean. Say portable fusion with something to catch all neutrons clean; or then Dark Matter Energy, if it exists:
    https://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/dark-matter-propulsion-proposed/

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: