A Black Problem, Indeed

Defining people by the color of their skin, and, even worse, by the color that their skin does not have, is racism. Period. Take that one, and swallow it, it’s good medicine. “Niger” is Latin for “black”. For racist reasons, the word has been controversial. Yet, the situation is complex.

Consider Greek tragedy, during the greatest age of Athens, from space. What is tragedy about? Primarily, reason. Secondarily, the fate reason, or lack thereof, irresistibly brings forth. In turn, fate imprisons human beings in its icy grip. The solution is to educate the Furies, those “Ancient Children”.

Reason can, and should, be applied, not just to instruct children, but to words and the concepts attached to them.

I was brought, raised and educated, as a child, mostly in Africa, among Africans. Let me tell you something I knew, so extremely well, when I was six years old, that I never deviated from, be it only once, for decades thereafter. This ancient piece of wisdom was taught to me by my mom. She uttered it just once, as a warning, she did not have to do it twice:

Calling someone “black” in Africa, is perceived, rightly, as a RACIST insult: never do it. Call Africans, “Africans”. 

A Touareg Couple. The Blue People of the Desert. Don’t Call Them Black: They Would Think You Are A Lunatic, Ignorant, Offensive, Vicious Aggressor. And they are not Arabs, either... Touareg alphabet is more than twice older than Arabic alphabet...

A Touareg Couple. The Blue People of the Desert. Don’t Call Them Black: They Would Think You Are A Lunatic, Ignorant, Offensive, Vicious Aggressor. And they are not Arabs, either… Touareg alphabet is more than twice older than Arabic alphabet…

[The French called Touaregs “Les Hommes Bleus”, the blue men, as they protected themselves from the harsh desert heat, light, wind and sand with layers of blue cloth. They live in the middle of the world’s largest desert, the Sahara. They have been denied a country, so far. The desert was crisscrossed by traders, war parties and raiders, for millennia. And many came for slaves in Black Africa. However empires, such as the Almoravids, were also born there, ruling over 3,000 kilometers, all the way from Mali to Europe’s Al Andalus.]

Most Africans, indeed, are NOT “black”, but of various shades. Thus, if I were, say, beige, why would you call me “black”? I am so little to you that you don’t even look at me? Is calling me according to a color I don’t even have part of the general distortion of me you enjoy inflicting on me, and having me answer to?

Am I so insignificant to you, that you do not bother to find a proper qualifier for me, deeper than skin-deep? Or, worse of all, as many “blacks” are from the deepest forest, or are well-known to be viewed as such, are you trying to insinuate that, I too, are not from a culture worth mentioning?  

In a reply, Facebook DuJuan Ross observed that: “Malcolm X himself popularized the descriptive as a deliberate militating against White Supremacists resorting to it as a pejorative.”

Malcolm X had an interesting trajectory (including among various variants of Islam, one of which got him assassinated). His reddish hair inherited from his Scottish maternal grandfather brought him the nickname “Red”. Malcolm said: “I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he’s wrong. Than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil.”

Malcolm X made his little reasoning that calling people of part African ancestry “black” and “negroes” . He was himself following Aimé Césaire and Leopold Sedar Senghor, world-famous writers and activists who made the same reasoning a generation prior. (My father was a friend of Senghor, a great writer, French MP and co-author of the French constitution and first president of Senegal.) The martiniquais poet and politician Aimé Césaire forged the word « négritude » Cesaire and Senghor used outright “negre”. “negritude” (negre being the French deformation of “niger”, namely black in Latin). Fine, I am all for it.

There is something correct about this, when addressing the culture and art of populations which are as black as black can be (say in parts of West Africa not long penetrated by Peuls). Indeed the art, there is delightfully obsessed by ultimate blackness. A painting where the dominant “color” is black can be eerily beautiful, and street artists in… Black Africa are experts at it. I am very attached to this art, tied to my childhood, and which have seen nowhere else. So one can use “black” where it is appropriate. What I am decrying is systematic, deliberate distortions of reality.

Aimé Césaire was from the Caribbean, not Africa. So it is only natural that he did not know that, in Africa, qualifying people by the color of their skin is frowned upon, and viewed, rightly, as racism. North Africans, Peuls, many East Africans, Ethiopians, Christian or not, and most enemies of the Zulus and other Bantus in South Africa, turn livid when one calls them black.

I find much of the work of Malcolm X deep and judicious. However, calling someone such as Obama, who is not any more “black” than 50 members of my own American family (I have seen them together) is not just ridiculous, it’s dishonest. Obama himself knows this very well, so why the double language? What are we selling, which require lies to be bought?

Let me repeat slowly: calling people by the color of their skin, and even more so when said color is imagined (as when someone beige is called “black”) is giving maximum importance to maximum superficiality. It’s not just racism, but an attack against reason.

But of course, it’s no accident. There is a meta-reason for it. When one celebrates attacks against reason in one area, one is then in the mood to make more attacks against in other areas. Thus one ends, deprived of reasons, nude and without defense when exploiters come to issue their orders. Hence the sorry state of affairs.

Ironically, the Obama presidency was a victim of the black problem. Having called Obama “the black president”, and viewing this superficial absurdity as a great success, most of Obama “supporters” did not support him at all, when and where he needed support and encouragement.

The failure of the Obama presidency is greatly entangled with the black problem of brandishing the black label as the end-all, be-all. Let’s stay away from all this obsession with skin color.

Reason is about finding out why people do what they do. There are always reasons. The Universe does not play with dice. Yes, I know Quantum Physics, in its present most accepted formulation, says the opposite. But that was in the last few decades, and evolution has been all about reason, in the last 600 million years, ever since there are brains, and they think.

So please learn to call black what’s black, and leave it at that. Obama was first an Hawaiian (who spent 4 years in Indonesia), brought and educated by white people, at Hawai’i most exclusive private school. Nothing black about any of that, and as any real African would tell you. 
Patrice Ayme’

Tags: , , , ,

11 Responses to “A Black Problem, Indeed”

  1. EugenR Says:

    I don’t get the problem. To me black and white are just colours, just as blue or yellow. If we speak about aesthetics, in any race you have beautiful people and ugly ones. At the end the aestheticsis all about personal taste. And about taste shouldn’t be hold an argument, at least that what is said in the Talmud. As to national features, i would say there are some differences in white European population and even bigger ones in African black population. I personaly find the Italian features most attractive among the darker Europeans and the Slavic and Scandinavian features among the pale northern nations. (sorry not so much the French and definitely not the German or English). But these differences are in process of disappearance anyway. What’s more interesting than colour of skin is the cultural differences between the races or rather nations, that are more important than the aesthetics. Here the differences are significant and can’t be neglected. As i wrote it in one of my comments there is a huge and growing gap between those, who build their cultural and intellectual World view on evidence perceived by using consistent and controlled methodology and those who base it on fairy tales, faith in mythology, urban myths or conspiracy theories.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Agreed. Attaching too much importance to skin color, on the part of his supposed followers and admirers, was actually the downfall of the Obama presidency. Instead of encouragement propped by healthy criticism, they confused any critique with racism, thus leaving Obama without support.


      • EugenR Says:

        We need large-scale systemic revolution in education.
        These children will be the reservoir for the next suicide bomber army unless. What is needed is proper educatin without borders. Proper means with endorsing the right to ask questions and not only inforce predefined concepts, dogmas, myths, beliefs and theories.


        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Agreed: as the article says, I said, and I am sure you said, education is a human right.
          However, the problem is at the root the rotten (pseudo-) intellectuals of the West. They are the ones who instilled the hatred of mental superiority.

          You should read what’s circulating about me, even among Texas publications, right now. The people who launched the venom are (pseudo-) FRENCH (pseudo-) intellectuals who actually live in the USA, and pose as “humanists”. They call me names, say I know nothing about Cesaire, or, actually, “power” (funny thing to say for someone who has been in the presidential bubble…)

          What these pseudo intellectuals did was to laud ignorance, because they are full of it. Hence for example their Islamophilia.


          • EugenR Says:

            I wonder what is philosophical basis of these Lefty oppinions. They can’t claim they are humanists, since accepting despotic cultures and theirvleaders as legitimate can’t be humanism. They can’t say they are liberals, since they support and supported everything that is anti west, including Pol Pot and Jean Bedel Bokassa the canibal. To day they have no criticism against the Islam, inspite of being this religion agresive anti humanist, anti education, anti women right, anti minority rights, anti liberal, anti democratic, anti socialist, anti………….. everything what we believe in and is worth to live and fight for. They have no problem with having a huge mosque in the most central, most important spot in London, close to the home of ikon of racionlity Sherlock Holmes, Regents park. This i call defeatism. Then all these Lefties are surprised that majority of people are voting for Brexit and Donald Trump and they call it a mistake. I wonder who will smash all these Lefties first, the Islamists or the Brexiters. By the way i am against the irational reaction of the “people” to all these “Lefty intellectuals”, politicians, commentators, jurnalists, who vomit (i vomit therefore I am) their oppinions without any judgment of the mind, just because it is fashionable in their circle of friends to do so.


  2. benign Says:

    Vive la France!

    cheers, benign


  3. DuJuan Ross Says:

    DuJuan Ross: Maybe it’s more about TO WHOM than WHAT’S BEING SOLD,as well as the tricky phenomenology of Self-esteem fulfilling Prophecy.

    American Blacks to some extent have conned themselves into believing their unique travail immunizes them from charges if prejudice and bigotry.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Yes, well, indeed. it did not start with them, I researched it a bit, and it turns out that, as with all too many other things (Maoism, Leninism, Marxism: see Marx’s ‘Excerpt notes of 1844’ also called the ‘Paris manuscripts’; or even Adam Smith…), it started in Paris. American “blacks” in Paris, such as McKay, influenced by French intellectuals, like Cesaire. I am writing a second full essay about that, following the present one..


  4. Curtis Woods I I Says:

    So your whole article it is assumed that if your called black is a bad thing? I just wonder if called white would there be the same issue? Myself and other afro-asiatic people take extreme offence to this argument. And people like you do not help our problem in Kidal. Thank You


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      “your called black is a bad thing” is such improper grammar I have no idea what you mean. Neither do I know what “Kidal” means. So I don’t know what you take “extreme offence” about.
      I am an African. Like a real African raised in Africa. First thing one learns in Africa is that one should not mention skin color. Being called “black” is bad, being called “white” is bad. Now, neither calling is a catastrophe…
      You can read my latest essay Brexitxit where I give an explicit example of the “color” madness…


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: