PC = Political Correctness = PERFECTLY CLOSED Minds

PC, Perfectly Closed Intellectual Fascism, key to total civilizational collapse…

“Politically Correct” is a euphemism for “Perfectly Closed”:

In first approach, PC consists in a set of taboos, places where one should never go mentally. For example, if one evokes colonialism or slavery, the PC crowd bleats: condemn Europe. Never mind the fact that Europe was the only slave-free place in the world, then. PC is not about facts, logic. It’s about what makes the powers that be feel good about you, and you can join the mass of sheep, and happily bleat together.

SDM, a commenter on this site, asked: “What exactly do you consider to be PC? you seem to be all over the place without defining your terms.” There are many definitions of “PC” (see Wikipedia on the subject). Here is mine: PC = PERFECTLY CLOSED [MIND].

My definition of Political Correctness is maximal, as general as possible. The beauty, and power, of generalization is something one learns by studying modern mathematics: Generalizing simplifies. Ever since Cardano, a surgeon, took square roots of negative numbers in the 16th Century, mathematics has been generalizing.

“PC”, usually the abbreviation for “Politically Correct”, is, in truth, the exact opposite: “Political Correctness” is extremely detrimental to the Polis…For very deep, neurological, and physical reasons, the “Politically Correct” is an addictive drug, which brings quickly the fall of the polis that it pretends to protect.

***

PC censored minds are closed to what opens the world of understanding, debate: What is the interest of that? Who profits from the crime?

As usual, as Nietzsche would tell you, one has to distinguish the interest of the masters from that of the slaves, just as one has to distinguish the morality of the slaves and the morality of the masters.

Closed minds have fewer dimensions, they are easy to rule. They offer stable homes for intellectual fascism. The PC doctrine is one of the oldest tricks of the greatest dictators. In the past, violating it often meant death.

In Europe and the Middle Earth, for more than a millennium, “Politically Correct” meant being a (well-behaved) Christian or a Muslim. That correctness was enforced by the death penalty (laws of emperor Theodosius against heresy (390 CE), and Muhammad, emperor of Arabia, starting around 630 CE, for disrespect against Islam.)

*** 

Intellectual Fascism Costs Less and Attack More! Real Thinking goes in all directions. Intellectual Fascism entertains just a few. The simplest, most hare-brained tribalism unites the empire around these few ideas. The most intelligent empires, like the Athenian empire, enact just the exact opposite.

PC forces to focus on what should be non-subjects.

For example, Europe and its presumed culpability about slavery: Europe outlawed slavery in 650 CE, nearly 14 centuries ago.  (European colons, far from the arm of European law, reintroduced slavery, mostly because it was the usage all over, outside of Europe.)

Examples of non-subject and disinformation: the very word “antisemitism” (by which is meant “anti-judaism”). US and EU media love to accuse everybody they don’t like of “antisemitism”(for example Trump was accused of antisemitism, when his closest family is Jewish; in France opponents of Emmanuel Macron are accused of “antisemitism”… even though Macron is not Jewish).

The Politically Correct obsession enables the pseudo-left to pontificate about red herrings. And thus to avoid the important subjects, the simple evocation of which would endanger the plutocracy.

The case of Islam is typical : Islam is an ideology which orders to kill many categories of people. Such preaching should be subjected to the same penalties as if a Nazi were doing it. Instead, and although Islamists and Nazis were allied in World War Two, one is, mysteriously, accused of “racism” if one fears Islam.

The mystery is part of the indoctrination. As people are made to ponder pseudo-mysteries elaborated precisely to mystify them,  all and any genuine progress on important subjects is avoided.

Hurling insults such as “racist” and “antisemite”, “colonialist” prevents We The People to be even aware that one should be passionate about such subjects such as HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING.

Why? Because high frequency trading  is one of the ways the plutocracy uses to become ever more powerful, year after year. Abuse such as high frequency trading is today’s slavery, today’s colonialism (colonizing the world). But if all what people worry about is slow slave trading two centuries ago, they don’t have the mental space to know even of the existence of high frequency trading.

***

“Political Correctness” is nothing new: it has existed ever since there were dictators, and that’s how they ruled:

Ruling over the Polis, implies forbidding We The Sheeple to have inadmissible thoughts, or broaching some taboo subjects. The very fact that the pseudo-left has embraced Political Correctness demonstrates that their mannerism is just a travesty of plutocracy. Shame on them!

By excluding from debates entire subjects, the Jihadists of wealth, the PC whip masters, prevent the analysis of the exploitation schemes plutocracy organizes. (This is not an outrageous analogy. Real Islamist Jihadists worked real hard for the US fracking industry, by forcing the price of oil at extravagant level for those years where fracking rigs were paid for, built, and deployed in the USA; I am not choosing my words at random. It’s hilarious to realize that those who died screaming Alluha Akbar, God is Great, died for US oil men and their co-conspirators… GIs, who were also killed and maimed, may find this less hilarious. What I just wrote is highly Politically Incorrect, of course, as are all serious truths not previously revealed…)

***  

Intellectual Fascism: it deserves its own essay. Political fascism arises from Ethological Fascism, the fact that social animals fight better when they ACT as a super-organism (the mass with the greatest mass wins, even hyenas versus lions).

Excluding entire subjects from debate closes the minds to external influences. That stabilizes the Intellectual Fascism. A fascist mind needs to be protected from exterior influences.

An open mind does not need to be protected. By definition, an open mind is open to all influences.

Mental, and Intellectual fascisms proceed of an even more general principle, the Principle of Least Action. Brains try to do as little as possible, so adopting others’ ideas is all the more irresistible, when they come from one’s superiors.

***

Tribalism rests most economically, most stupidly, upon Political Correctness:

Aspasia was a philosopher who wrote the best speeches of her husband, Pericles. She promoted the “Open Society”, the exact opposite of “Political Correctness” (“We throw our city open to the world”). Thus she was put on trial on a number of charges, including , of course, “impiety”.

Impiety? Tribalism is the basic religion. Always has, always will be. It defines the “Politically Correct”, what one has to believe rather than explain.

***

Those who rule, rule best, when they rule over the minds of their slaves, training them like dogs. This is what “Political Correctness” does. PC is the melodious barking of those dogs. Always has been, always will be. Instead, really philosophy is a discordance.

Even if, at some point of history a Polis (City-State in Greek; by generalization a nation, or empire) had achieved perfect morality (and this never happened), this would have been unsustainable. Politics is always geometrodynamics, because so is the environment. And it’s nonlinear, because it self-interacts, be it only through the ecology which it ravages  

Civilization is never a closed box, as it bursts, Plus Ultra, through all the bounds, even if successful, especially if successful. Political Correctness.  

Calling things by the opposite of what they are is the basis of deception. See the “Affordable Care Act” (The ACA did not have much cost control of the world’s most expensive health care; thus some of the world’s greatest plutocrats supported it, just as they support Brexit, for the same exact reason: augmenting their power).

By calling things by the opposite of what they are, way the sheeple cannot suspect the enormity of the lie, as Adolf Hitler explained in detail in his famous book “Mein Kampf”. This has long been used by US plutocratically owned media (my own “Mediating Pluto” from 2013, explains why the New York Times has banned me).

Examples of mislabelling abound: “Catholicism” means “Universalism” (in Greek): yet the “Catholics” immediately proceeded to exterminate any understanding of the world beyond their Qur’an (Qur’an means “recitation” in Arabic. So my usage here is not just biting irony, but translating in Arabic Catholic practice. Actually “Islam” is pretty much “Catholicism” translated in Arabic, for the desert).

Similarly “Communism” was the opposite of what happened with Stalinism and Maoism, or “National-Socialism” just the opposite of what it claimed to be, as it was revealed to be anti-national, and anti-socialist. Much of what is called “capitalism” and “liberalism” right now is neither.  

***

Worrying about Political Correctness, is even older than Socrates’ murky drama. The case of Socrates shows, indeed, a dearth of PC can bring death and become criminal (Socrates was condemned to death for “corrupting the youth”: his students and lovers, 50 years younger than him, were central to the near-annihilation of Athens in Peloponnesian War, and Socrates was obstinately democidal, a tradition Plato and Aristotle pursued until the official subjection of Athens to Macedonian overviewed plutocracy).

In March 1968,  Michel Foucault, a psychiatrically trained French philosopher, said: “a political thought can be politically correct (‘politiquement correcte’) only if it is scientifically painstaking“. So the term actually originated in France. Only if it scientifically proven, painstakingly. ONLY IF!

In May 1991, at a commencement ceremony for a graduating class of the University of Michigan, then U.S. President George H.W. Bush excoriated Political Correctness  in his speech: “The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones. It declares certain topics off-limits, certain expression off-limits, even certain gestures off-limits.”

(I officially hate Prescott Bush, H.W.’s father, a criminal-against humanity from his extreme collaboration with Adolf Hitler, and I despise W. Bush, another criminal against humanity, for his fracking-promoting invasion of Iraq; but I respect H. W. Bush, the navy’s youngest pilot, he had cheated to enroll… H. W. Bush would have never dismantled FDR’s Banking Act of 1933, as Bill Clinton and his goons did)

Earlier Blum had written “The Closing Of The American Mind” (1987; I bought the book, but didn’t read it really very much, too boring and too…closed)

Seen my way, Political Correctness, this Perfect Closure, is closely tied to Intellectual Fascism ( a precursor of, but much more general than, political fascism).

***

Political Correctness, Perfect Closure makes Intellectual Fascism not only possible, but sustainable. However, Intellectual Fascism, by reducing intelligence, makes the Polis, the City, the Nation, the Empire, Civilization, even less sustainable than Political Fascism does.

Many civilizations went on, sometimes for millennia, as Political Fascism: the obvious example are muscular, well-organized empires such as Egypt and China (although “China” was often several). However, when either engaged in Intellectual Fascism (having not enough correct, fresh ideas), they quickly went down.

Europe after the collapse of Athens under Macedonia, knew hope for real democracy with the Roman Republic, which had very strong anti-plutocratic laws. However, once those were removed, de facto, from globalization (circa 150 CE), Rome survived as a Republic In Name Only (RINO).

Intellectual Fascism is self-amplifying: hence emperor Theodosius anti-heresy laws of 390 CE made the empire collapse in a few years. Within ten years, the bishops who governed the empire gave power to the Franks, in the North-West, as they had no ideas, no choice, no money, no army, and neither the taste nor capability to do what their government of bishops needed to do.

The Franks, a recently unified confederation of Dutch (or ‘lower Germans’), legislated under a law written for them by Roman lawyer-generals, brought back tolerance for diversified people and their variegated ideas by clamping down on Jihad Christianism.

Since then Europe clamped down enough on Intellectual Fascism to produce mental progress. 

But full democracy a la Athens, 25 centuries ago, has not been re-established. Worse: the Politically Correct resurfacing today, is reminiscent of the monks dressed all in black who destroyed thinkers and their books, around 400 CE (especially in places such as Egypt).  Those monks in black were the main cause of the Dark Ages.  

While we are supposed to vilify Europe for all it did not really do, and certainly for a very long time, there is a New Force on Wall Street: The ‘Family Office’, reveals the Wall Street Journal:
‘Clans with nine-figure fortunes are increasingly investing through unregulated firms known as family offices, impinging on the business of investment banking and private equity.’ It turns out that they conspire…

“On a warm October day in 2014, envoys from 15 of America’s wealthiest families gathered at Circle T, Ross Perot Jr.’s 2,500-acre ranch outside Dallas. Skeet-shooting was on the agenda, but the real purpose of the two-day retreat was for the families to get acquainted and eventually team up to pursue investments.

From that exclusive gathering, attended by people investing the fortunes of Michael Bloomberg and other billionaires, sprang a broader network of 150 families that have since participated in more than 10 deals together, including acquisitions.

Such transactions traditionally were the province of big companies or private-equity firms. But a disruptive force has emerged on Wall Street: the family office. These entities, set up to manage the fortunes of the wealthy, and able to operate under the radar, are making their presence felt with their growing numbers, fat wallets and hunger for deals.”

Meanwhile the PC cultural retards don’t have any notion of the preceding, busy as they are calling everybody a racist, not knowing that it was exactly what the Nazis were doing during their ascent (more bad news for the PC crowd: the Nazis were very loudly defending minority rights, the environment and the rights of animals. Hitler was a vegetarian; all of this PC distractions deliberately planted to make the German people lose sight of what was essential…)

The reign of the non-censored Internet gives hope, though. Now at last, and at least, we can debate, no holds barred, a few squeaks in the darkness… While our masters laugh, martinis in hand, watching the sun set from their private islands, secure from their vast conspiracies, protected by their private armies, jetting around in their private jet fleets, as the little ones down there are calling each other names…

Patrice Ayme’

 

 

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

12 Responses to “PC = Political Correctness = PERFECTLY CLOSED Minds”

  1. SDM Says:

    That pretty well sums it up. The old adage of divide and conquer effected through manipulation of the media. With the few entities now controlling most of the media, the general populace is not very well informed and rather misinformed as a rule. Plutos have cornered the media and are in full propaganda mode. The people are fed nonsense “news” and led to bickering about rather minor issues while the 1% continue to amass obscene wealth and power. Where is the tipping point?
    “PC” gets bandied about from both the left and right with the result being mostly confusion, misinformation and anger. Trump is now attacking the media nonstop as crooked (there is truth to that) but with the disturbing message that the press (a free press being a counter to the powers that be) is generally a bad thing rather than something that just needs some good housecleaning.

  2. EugenR Says:

    The worst enemy of the humanity, humanism, democracy and liberalism is the one sided political correctness. One-sidedly politically correctness means it is perfectly right to say enoying lies about the Jews, and to say truth about the Muslims is wrong? This one sided political correctness, or in other words one sided over politeness, went so far, that it is not polite to mention that all the murderers and troublemaking ignorant massed wherever they are, in London, Paris, Brussels, Madrid, Nice​ or Munchester are Muslim youth. And yes if the academic intellectuals of the British universities will not mention out of politeness the word Holocaust, so the Brexiters, the Trumpers or the La Painers will remind to the astonished British intellectuals, that to be a polite denier, or to be a Holocaust Denier will bring them to the real hell, which is not a Jewish hell, but a Muslim-Nazi hell and the hell of its opponents, the European Nazi hell, while unfortunately their first sacrifice will be the few remaining European Jews, but right after them the European intellectuals and educated people of Europe, exactly as it happened in Germany 80 years ago. Is it not surprising that since world war two there are almost no German intellectuals influancing the Intellectual scenery of the world, while before WWII they had the leading possition? Where are the German philosophers, from the times between the two world wars? All of them left to London, New York, or Zurich, except Heidegger​ the Nazi, so there was noone left to teach the new generations.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Nietzsche saw the German criminal madness coming, and condemned it stridently, thoroughly and great detail. He proposed to kick out of Germany the antisemites, because they were the obviously inferior race. So the insects who followed him have no excuses.

      • EugenR Says:

        Nietzse claimed that to be human meant to have free will. No religious or ideological phanatics have it. This is why he condemned both, the socialists, be it national or social socialists and the religious faith followers, not to speak about the blind brain washed masses, without even understanding what their fhurer represents. Nietzse would be strongly surprised, that more than hundred years since his last publication you have still both kinds of people, and even more of them than then. It seems humanity as such, manipulable by superstitions​, prejudice, prejudgments, mentality of flock and swarm, believing in fairy tales and conspiracy theories is doomed. Only the new kind of post human, the Cyber man with some non human qualities, we can hardly understand and predict what that actually means, will be the real winners​ of the evolutionary race. If not, all this is without purpose, and still as an ordinary pre-humans, it is hard for us to accept such a state of being.

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          “Fanatic” comes actually from the LATIN word “Fanum” meaning, the temple. Somebody who is coming from the temple is thus a fanatic…
          Nietzsche was not optimistic: he said terrible wars were coming, to Europe, and that the Germans would cause them. He also clearly saw that rage against the Jews would play a role. Nietzsche had a whole zoo of the psychological degeneracies which would affect the human race (they are in “Also Spracht Zarathustra”).

          Anyway, he pretty much nailed it.
          But this is now.

          Interestingly, the contrast between good and evil was more blatant in Nietzsche’s times. (I mean it’s blatant in what I write, but I don’t see this viewpoint of mine as shared by any power that be… Yeah, Obama picked much of it, but only as thetoric he brandished to hide that he was doing the opposite; Nietzsche did have academic and plutocratic support… Otherwise he would have never even surfaced: he needed money to publish 200 copies of “Beyond Good And Evil”…)

          Right now Pluto control is very great, we are not far from what happened to the Roman Republic around 150 BCE. Islamophilia is just one indication of it… BTW, I don’t agree with the metaphysics of Nietsche. I don’t think that he did either… Just he did not realize that. As proven by his dislike of Darwin…

          • EugenR Says:

            Darwinism as all the sciences​ is deterministic. Even quantum mechanics. If to use science as directive for moral judgement, there is no free will, then no good and no evil. This is the problem of all rational philosophies. On the other hand irational mystical faith in Supper Commander

  3. EugenR Says:

    Try to write it again. Darwinism as all the other sciences is deterministic. If to use science as directive for moral judgment, there​ will be no free will, no good and no evil. On the other hand irational mystical faith in Supper Commander, leaves most of the decision process in his arbitrary hand. As it proves to happen time after time, it can’t be any worse. Somehow always the worse butchers take over. Without any cultural differences. It is always the same, in Russia and Germany, in China or Cambodia, in Iraq or Iran, Africa or South America. This appears to be an universal fact about human nature. Yet there where few exceptions. George Washington, De Gaulle, Mendela, Ghandy. They could all become dictators, but have chosen free election system. Whats in common in them? They were all well educated, but so was Napoleon, Lenin ( a professor of philosophy), and i am less sure about the education level of Maozedung ​or Pol Pot. If to use the famous quote of Tolstoy in opposit way, “all the evil leaders are the same, while the good ones are all different”. Meaning, while evil comes from the strong belief of the evil leader of himself being the chosen one to represent God or History or Nation or Race, (you can see it in smaller scale with Erdogan, Nataniahoo and Trump), to be a good leader, you have to have many different reasons. Just the first condition is, the leader must to be mentally much more sophisticated​ in his philosophical​ thinking, than to believe over simplistically in the only one way, the “My Way”.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Quantum Physics is not deterministic. As it is the foundation of all science, science is not determinstic. In my opinion, evolution will turn out not just to be “Darewinian”, but Quantum (“Lamarck”)

  4. Benign Says:

    Quick comment as an economist: yes, economic stress divides along the lines of usually latent hostilities; division favors the existing hierarchy, until it breaks; so one might speculate that a healthy economy with well-distributed wealth would mute PC tendencies and encourage free speech.

    In general the law seems to get it about right: language that incites to violence etc. should be illegal. But, as with sexual harassment, if we move into the realm where the accusation is true (and damaging) by definition, then we are done.

    However, madness can erupt in any environment.

    cheers, benign

    (I will try to read the whole thing)

  5. pshakkottai Says:

    Hi Patrice:
    This reminds me of Borg of science fiction.

    The Borg are a fictional alien race that appear as recurring antagonists in the Star Trek franchise. The Borg are a collection of species that have been turned into cybernetic organisms functioning as drones in a hive mind called “the Collective” or “the Hive”. The Borg use a process called assimilation to force other species into the Collective by injecting microscopic machines called nanoprobes, as well as with surgically adding cybernetic parts.

    This is a good analogy to present day Islam.

    The Borg also destroy previous memories of organisms they assimilate. (Islam destroys previous history of previous civilizations.) Once assimulated, race or origin does not matter. And it is extremely hard to go back to previous culture.

    PC is a way of control of ‘drones’ by thought control, dogma by religion or by plutocratic propaganda of everybody else (including economists!)
    Partha.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Absolutely excellent analogy, Partha!
      With a difference: the Borg has, to my knowledge, no plutocrats profiting from it. Whereas Islam does, and always had. Dictatorship is the very principle of Islam. Much more than Christianity, which always recognized a law outside of Christian law (as emperor Justinian himself recognized around 540 CE, when he ordered the refurbishment of Roman law, distinguishing religious and secular law).

      There is no secularism in Islam. Like of secularism will kill the Borg.

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: