Islamophilia Causes Islam Terror

Islamophilia, a neologism, is the love of Islam, similar in the construction of the word, to the word pedophilia, the love of children (with the semantic twist, in the case of pedophilia, that it is meant to be the (implied) sexual love of children, a behavior presently unlawful). I use “Islamophilia” as an antidote to “Islamophobia“, also a word of recent manufacture, which is brandished for the purpose of demolishing civilization.

Pseudo-intellectuals supported Nazism. They had to be killed, before they killed us all (because killing us all, or so, is what they wanted). The necessity to kill millions of Nazis and Nazism itself was understood too late: dozen of millions of innocent bystanders got killed as a result. There are pseudo-intellectuals on the take, who, for decades, told everybody that to fear Islam (Islamophobia: phobia means fear in Greek) was “racism”. So I guess when I fear wasps, and vipers, I am racist, according to these vicious, venal idiots.

A Central Asian Islamist drove a truck down a special bike lane in New York. At least 8 killed. After nine blocks, at 40 mph, he burns a red light, and destroy his truck against a school bus full of screaming children. What was the name of that criminal (who should get the death penalty)” “Sword of Allah“, in Arabic. That is his name! And he was in the USA on a Green Card, an immigrant card!!! Better: that Uzbek came on a “Diversity Visa Program“. These are visas given by lottery to individuals from “under-represented countries” who apply, online, even if they have no skills, and no ties to the USA. Fifty thousands (50,000) are given a year (!) Al Qaeda and ISIS have used the program to implant “sleepers”. Obama judges love it (for their real motivation, read the end of this essay). (Trump has suggested to eliminate “Diversity Visas“, but was blocked by judges for being “anti-Muslim”.)

Of course, “Sword of Allah” was a “nice guy” (even though a Uber driver!) They are all “nice guys“, and that’s why they want to please their Aztec, or Islam god. The nicer they are, the more they want to please. God. Their God. That’s why they say always “God is Great”. Because it ain’t obvious: their “god”‘ rather seems to be a scum. The Uzbek scum, Sword of Allah, apparently killed or wounded children (some say up to 4 killed). It’s precisely because they are nice and want to be so nice to their scum dog of a god, that they are so dangerous. And tolerating their scum dog god, is the highest danger. It’s the scum dog god, who has to be destroyed, as an object of veneration.

The Qur’an is a 83,000 words book. It is a terror book, with hundreds of threats against all sorts of people: hypocrites, homosexuals, “polytheists”, apostates, individuals viewed as having denied or despised Islam, all sorts of believers in beliefs Islam does not believe in, etc. Also the Qur’an says those who die for Allah go to sit next to God, and then heavens, once all the Jews (!) have been killed.

Right, not much of Qur’an metaphysics is original, it would be unfair to single out Islam as a belief system: it’s not the worst that ever was. Close, but no cigars. (Because, first of all Islam by Muhammad was transformed within 20 years into a much more sexist version, thank to the third Caliph, Uthman. So what is, what should Islam really be?)

The ancient Viking religion,  3,000 year old (thus more than twice older than Islam), also rewarded warriors who had died in battle with heavens. (However, it was much more advanced, most of the time, in the role women played: some women had full rights with the Vikings, for example by being warriors, whereas this happened just once with Islam! In Egypt, when confronting France’s Saint Louis!) And, to a great extent, the Qur’an refers to the Bible with its Old Testament full of horrors.

Some will say:”Oh, but there is good stuff therein!” Sure, but, once you are dead, what good does good do to you? I personally despise those who follow in full the ancient Viking religion, the Bible, the Aztecs, or Catholicism as practiced in the Middle Ages. That does not make me racist, quite the opposite. That makes me civilized. More civilized. The same extends to Islam.

Islam believers, in black, killing Christian workers they captured, just because they are non Muslim.

“Oh people, recently you’ve seen us on the hills of Al-Sham [Greater Syria] and on Dabiq‘s Plain, chopping off the heads that had been carrying the cross delusion for a long time, filled with spite against Islam and Muslims, and today we… are sending another message: Oh crusaders, safety for you will be only wishes especially when you’re fighting us all together, therefore we will fight you all together until the war lays down its burdens and Jesus peace be upon him will descend, breaking the cross, killing the swine. The sea you’ve hidden Sheikh Osama bin Laden‘s body in, we swear to Allah we will mix it with your blood.

So how come the savagery of fundamental Islam, straight from 660 CE is back?

Since the 1930s, US oil men have made an alliance with the Saudi family which, itself, had made an alliance with Wahhab, someone who interpreted the basic texts of Islam literally. Thus, when a basic text seems to say that God wants someone killed, or tortured, for some reason, one should do so.

Literal Islam is incompatible with civilization. As a result, it was dropped by the Baghdad Caliphate, for centuries (“Golden Age of Islam”), and then Saladin (1117-1193), a Kurd who became Sultan of Egypt and Syria, and founder of the Ayyubid dynasty, made Literal Islam (= Salafism) unlawful. Practicing it brought the death penalty. Wahhab re-introduced it five centuries later.  

However, plutocrats (those who rule, kratos, according to evil, Pluto) have a symbiotic relation with deadly religions. This is why Roman emperors invented and imposed Catholicism, imposing the death penalty to those who chose otherwise (heresy in Greek; Fourth Century). Once a deadly religion is in place, the Plutos in power can accuse whoever they want of disrespecting the religion, and threaten to kill them, insuring their rule.

The universities have been active proselytizers of hard-core, fundamental Islam. Consider: “Philosophy Professor Tells Bisexual Student Who Criticized Islam ‘We’re Not Going to Let You Damage the Program'”. 

Read this surreal exchange below. “Browning is a pseudo-intellectual heading a philosophy department. MacDonald a student she terrorizes because he dared mention that he is to be killed by Islam law in at least ten countries.  Browning is trying her best to make the situation personal, instead of about Islam Law.

MACDONALD: I said that I was bothered that I could be killed in 10 Muslim countries. I’m bisexual. So they’d definitely do that in the 10 countries where I would be— you know.

BROWNING: Doesn’t that strike you as an inappropriate thing to say about someone’s fiance?

MACDONALD: I wasn’t talking about the fiance. The fiance could have whatever interpretation of the religion that they want. I said something like…(thinking) that I…yeah it wasn’t about the fiance, it was about the religious practices in those countries.

BROWNING: How is it appropriate to bring that up in connection with someone’s fiance?

MACDONALD: They brought it up. The Islam part.

BROWNING: And you brought up the threat to your life as posed by this fiance?

MACDONALD: No. We got to the subject of Islam, not the fiance.

BROWNING: Do you understand how someone would find that offensive?…

MACDONALD: Yeah, one of my good friends at the university is Muslim.

BROWNING: And do you tell him that you object to his religion because there are places on earth where gay, lesbian, and bisexual people are discriminated against, including your own country?

MACDONALD: Well, “her.” And my verbiage was “killed” not “discriminated against.” I mean, death penalty’s pretty severe.

BROWNING: What does that have to do with her being engaged to a Muslim?

MACDONALD: Nothing. I wasn’t talking about the engagement to the Muslim. I was talking about Islam in that particular moment.

BROWNING: Well, let me just say that kind of thing is not going to be tolerated in our department. We’re not going to tolerate graduate students trying to make other graduate students feel terrible for our emotional attachments.

MACDONALD: Um…all right.

BROWNING: And, if you don’t understand why that is, I can explain fully, or I can refer you to the Behavior Intervention Team on our campus, which consists of a counselor, faculty member, and person from student affairs who are trained on talking to people about what’s appropriate or what isn’t….

BROWNING: Those are things that would get you fired if you were working in my office. The Islam comment would get you fired.

MACDONALD: …Would it really get me fired to say that I could be killed somewhere?

BROWNING: In that situation as you’ve described it, absolutely yes.


BROWNING: Don’t even ask. It’s clear you’re not taking my word for it. I don’t care to convince you. If I can’t persuade you that it’s in your interest to behave in ways that other people don’t find offensive and objectionable, then at least I’ve done my job.

MACDONALD: Well I know that it’s in my interest. I’m just trying to understand the reasoning.

BROWNING: You don’t have to.

MACDONALD: Well, this is a truth-seeking discipline!”

Browning is not into truth, she is into getting paid, and oil yielding plutocrats faking fanaticism is where the money is.

As universities get money from those whose rule depends upon lethal interpretations of Islam, it’s only understandable that, from their point of view, any exposition of that Islam in the West is not kosher. It’s not just US universities, Oxford University employs as professor an “Islamologist” who has long been accused of rape, and various serious crimes, and whose grandfather founded the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization which worked with the Nazis. That organization’s motto: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

For years, Ramadan and his accomplices were all over French TV, teaching that any fear of Islam (“Islamophobia”) was racist. Ramadan, a racist, vicious, violent man, and a well-known rapist of women is professor in no less than two departments at Oxford University, because our leaders are on the take.

Glamour Magazine is owned by Advance Publishing, a privately (plutocratically) held company nearly a century old. The latest issue, named Linda Sarsour one of its Glamour 2017 Women of the Year. As a co-chair of the Women’s March, Sarsour has been honored by Time Magazine and defended by the New York Times as a target of “right-wing hate.” But no one among those who celebrate Sarsour has pointed out that Sarsour has actually promoted Sharia law as beneficial, and proclaimed “Jihad”  against American citizens. As  put it:

“What this scumbag did today is called Jihad. How he got there is through dawa: the process of indoctrination that poisons minds.” [2:46 PM – 31 Oct 2017]

Ayaan was born a Muslim in Somalia and thus was sexually mutilated when a girl. She escaped later to Europe, but then had to flee Europe when her collaborator Theo Van Gogh, a movie maker was savagely and repeatedly stabbed by a Moroccan who had read Van Gogh fit in one of these categories which God has ordered to be killed, as proven in the Qur’an. The entire police-justice system in Europe has been engineered to be soft on Muslim Fundamentalists: people such as Tariq Ramadan, who should be in prison, teach at Oxford instead.

Tariq Ramadan is part of a smirking and smiling group of well financed pseudo-intellectuals fostering Islamism, and it extends to an entire pseudo-left which was the forerunner of the same movement now in evidence in the USA. I agree with many of the theses of Edwy Plenel, founder of Mediapart: he actually follows some of what I have been saying publicly for decades. Yet, Edwy Plenel  is a judoka working for the establishment, in the guise of opposing it. That’s why they smile and smirk so much: they know something they believe their mesmerized audience does not suspect, the back of the establishment (same problem as with the Clintons, or Obama). Plenel pushes for Islamism, Sharia and Jihad even more efficiently than Ramadan (because he is less obvious). It should go without saying that, even the extreme right is not as anti-left than the partisans of Islamism, Sharia and Jihad. It should, but, amazingly, it does not: a Middle Age fanaticism Trojan Horse like Edwy Plenel is viewed as “left” and a genuine opponent of the establishment… when he is the exact opposite! He is an objective ally of Aramco, and Wall Street’s worst aspects.

The Jihadist from Tunisia who cut the throat and disembolled to death twenty year women in Marseilles had no right to be in the EU. He had given 7 different identities, and had not been expelled from the EU.

Mentally corrupt judges are the festering infection behind this epidemic. They will put free spirits in jail, for insulting Islam, an ideology, because those hare brained “judges” claim from their abyssal Perfectly Corrupt little minds, that depicting Islam for what it is, is “racism”. We would have the exact same situation if the Nazis had won: depicting Nazism for what it is would be called “racism”, and punished with prison.

The New York governor, two hours after the vicious attack in Manhattan, claimed it was the work of a “lone wolf“. Nevermind the allegiance of “Sword Of Allah” to ISIS, and its black flag in the truck. He said that because “Democrats” are supposed to say that. Of course, wolves are social animals.

They maybe lone wolves, but they are howling with Fundamental Islam.

For greater terror, let’s keep on singing the praises and pretend we are not afraid of an ideology, that wants to kill us. Our pro-wealth leaders want us to be terrorized and irrational. Once we are in that state of mind, hyper wealth can rule over us easily.

More generally, by making sure we fail to see we should not pay our respects to Fundamental Islam, our ideological leaders are making sure that we are unable to think clearly. Or, more exactly, they make sure that we keep on learning NOT to be able to think clearly.

Patrice Ayme’


Tags: , ,

9 Responses to “Islamophilia Causes Islam Terror”

  1. SDM Says:

    Corruption runs rampant and deep when the money is there. Was it Upton Sinclair who said it is hard to get someone to understand when his livelihood is based on not understanding it? If they pay you enough to say bad is good, then so it is. Just watch MSM talking heads babble on about nonsense and avoid truth and the real issues like the plague- if they do they will be gone from the airwaves.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Indeed. And it happens with the strangest idea streams. Aeon “a magazine of ideas” just threatened to suspend me if I repeated that the Nazis advocated and practiced antinatalist policies in 1937. For some reason, Aeon decided that it was important to push the notion of “antinatalism”, and that I had made an “attack ad hominem” against the “professor”, Benatar, who advocates killing humanity.
      See comment #20 or something in:

      Many of the editorialists at the New York Times are on the take, and as many self-described would-be left, they banned me as if I were the devil. But… it worked. I used to have much more readers when i was not banned by the Daily Kos and the like.

      Actually, after I caused a scandal with Google, Facebook and Apple executives some weeks ago, other high society types told me nobody would invite me anymore anywhere, their jobs depended upon it! Well, allright, after 30 years being nice, I may as well stop socializing with scum.


    • Gmax Says:

      True, the ones with the most money were the Saudis and their American compadres


  2. SDM Says:

    correction- “if they don’t they will be gone”


  3. Gmax Says:

    Admiration for Islam is a plot to make us all stupid, indeed. The PC crowd inthe Big Apple is getting what it deserves though. Having this scumbag bit Linda Sars our a self proclaimed Jihadist for woman of the year at Glamour is the cherry on the cake


  4. Gloucon X Says:

    Thanks, Patrice. Excellent points as usual. I was reading the New Testament and I noticed that Jesus also makes all kinds of threats against those who won’t believe that he is God walking the earth. Then it occurred to me just how cowardly and despicable was his invention of the idea of a torture chamber Hell for those who simply couldn’t believe his delusional story, which is simply one among thousands. He and his followers wanted to kill all those who didn’t believe, but they were too cowardly to do so, so he tried to soothe his fellow fanatics with the idea of a Hell. The Christian knows is his heart that unbelievers will be tortured in Hell and is comforted by that vision.

    I suspect that the Western plutocrats are worried that Christianity is fading and so they want Islam to take its place. Plutocracy needs to keep the focus off of the fact that their existence is illegitimate and is based on simple theft. Religion has proven to be a great way for them to achieve that goal. Religion helps facilitate plutocracy’s need for spreading, idiocy, division, and distraction among the working class. Religions, especially the stupidest versions like Christianity and Islam, have proven to be among the most divisive and violent in human history. Religions like these are a plutocrat’s dream come true.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Yes, thanks Gloucon, I much appreciate that you liked my points (I tinkered a bit with the essay in the meantime, making it better armored, at the cost of being a bit heavier, the old problem with battleships…)
      Christianism played a fundamental role in the rise of Islamism. Waraka, the second cousin (!) of Muhammad guy who told Mahomet/Muhammad that what he had “seen” in the desert was the Archangel Gabriel talking in the name of God, was the FIRST cousin (!!) of the wife of Mahomet, his wealthy employer, the 40-year-old merchant Khadija, herself a second cousin of Muhammad. Waraka and Khadija were the first cousins twice removed of Muhammad! Reason: they were all from the Quraish tribe, which held Mecca…

      Waraka knew Muhammad earlier than when the latter was the age of five, one on one. Waraka translated the Bible New Testament into Arabic, from the Greek.

      Aisha (who was married to Muhammad at age 6, “consumed” at 9!), daughter of the First Caliph said:
      Aisha also said

      “The Prophet returned to Khadija while his heart was beating rapidly. She took him to Waraqa bin Naufal who was a Christian convert and used to read the Gospel in Arabic Waraqa asked (the Prophet), “What do you see?” When he told him, Waraka said, “That is the same angel whom Allah sent to the Prophet) Moses [GABRIEL]. Should I live till you receive the Divine Message, I will support you strongly.”
      As Muhammad grew in age, Waraka’s knowledge of the scriptures increased. Several years later, when told of Muhammad’s first revelation (which is understood to be Sura 96:1-5), Waraka acknowledged his call to prophecy as authentic. Tradition recounts Waraka saying: “There has come to him the greatest Law that came to Moses; surely he is the prophet of this people”.[12] A narration from Aisha gives these details:

      Khadija then accompanied him to her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin ‘Abdul ‘Uzza, who, during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the writing with Hebrew letters. He would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as God wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to Waraqa, “Listen to the story of your nephew, O my cousin!” Waraqa asked, “O my nephew! What have you seen?” God’s Apostle described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, “This was the same one who keeps the secrets whom Allah had sent to Moses (angel Gabriel). I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out.” God’s Apostle asked, “Will they drive me out?” Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said, “Anyone (man) who came with something similar to what you have brought was treated with hostility; and if I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly.” But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while.

      Replacement of Christianism by Islamism is a fact. I used to know a PhD equipped blonde in New York who converted to Islam. Because Islam has “no priests”. As far as I could see, indeed, she couldn’t sleep with priests, but she slept with the local Imam. Convenient. One stop, full service. Her name is Susan Sa… She is very intelligent, but came from a fanatical Christian background.

      It is all indeed true that the stupidity of Christianism and Islamism keeps the masses busy and distracted. The return of fanatical, lethal Christianism can be exactly dated to 1026 CE, when the first “heretics” in centuries were burned alive. This corresponds to the rise of the “Feudal” order, an illegal plutocracy mostly based on making hereditary and proprietary the offices created under the Carolingians. For examples the 300 counties of the Renovated Roman empire, which were initially like present day counties in the USA. The crusades started by 1095 CE, and enormous fanatics like Saint Bernard (the real Pope, enemy of Abelard and launcher of the Second Crusade), were actually from plutocratic families (Saint Bernard could make a show of living in terrible conditions, but, like all extreme Plutos, all he wanted was power… And those terrible conditions he self-inflicted provided that power…)

      Anyway, we fully agree…


  5. Picard578 Says:

    I have this theory where intellectuals have a chaos in their heads, yet are too proud to ask for help. Hence, they support totalitarian ideologies such as Communism, Nazism and Islam.

    Don’t get too hung up over current murders by Islam, though. It is nothing compared to what is in the store. Islam killed hundreds of millions, more than either Nazism or Communism. Because Qur’an is held to be a literal “word of a God”, its insanity is accepted along with everything else.

    I am not sure what you mean under “not worse what ever was”. Ancient Norse religion rewarded warriors who died in battle… but there were some very good things about Norse culture as well. Norse women had far better status than even their Christian counterparts, let alone Muslim ones. And religion is inseparatedly connected to culture. West has abandoned even the humanized Christianity, and has also abandoned its own culture (which, truth be told, is inherited from Ancient Greece – but then again, Christianity did develop within Ancient Greek framework).


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Hmmmm… I agree with what you say, about the role of women under the Vikings, so I went back to the essay, and modified the passage you pointed out. New version is:

      “…it would be unfair to single out Islam as a belief system: it’s not the worst that ever was. Close, but no cigars (because, first of all Islam by Muhammad was transformed within 20 years into a much more sexist version, thank to the third Caliph, Uthman. So what should Islam really be?) The ancient Viking religion,  3,000 year old (thus more than twice older than Islam), also rewarded warriors who had died in battle with heavens. (However, it was much more advanced, most of the time, in the role women played: some women had full rights with the Vikings, for example by being warriors, whereas this happened just once with Islam! In Egypt, when confronting France’s Saint Louis!) And, to a great extent, the Qur’an refers to the Bible with its Old Testament full of horrors”

      Our present culture is a mix. The ANTISEXIST element does NOT come from the Greeks, especially the Athenian version, who were sexist (Athenians were much more sexist than other city-states, especially Sparta). The Romans were highly sexist, but they improved considerably after contact with the Etruscan. Augustus’ (main) wife was Etruscan…

      The Celts and Germans were anti-sexist. To Romans’ aghast astonishment, giant blondes knew how to sword fight. In the end, the blonde Amazons had to surrender, but barely so. Of course, Christianity put a cold shower on all that, as the ilk of Saint Paul had something deeply wrong in their sexual inclinations (“Better marry than burn” -Saint Paul)

      Anti-sexism is the natural status of the human species. The North had it, not the Mediterranean. BTW, the Amazons really existed and were Germanic, between the Black Sea and the Altai (some went south, introducing horses much civilization to… CHINA!)

      The Franks had seven major ruling queens in less than a century, thanks to the anti-sexist Salic Law (thus the Franks did MUCH better than 20C French!). One of them, Bathilde, changed civilization.

      Christianity evolved within the HELLENISTIC framework, a polite term for the galaxy of dictatorships Alexander left behind. So did the degenerated philosophy known as Stoicism.


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: