Hear, Hear: War Criminal Powell Will Vote Biden

Colin Powell, Defense Secretary of G.W. Bush, deliberately lied to the United Nations in 2003, claiming Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction. The idea emanated from Senator Biden of the Foreign Com. Because Powell, and Biden, were highly respected, many UN members, such as the UK, sided with the US. France was unable to get the UN to block the US… But neither did the US get an authorization to attack.

….regarding whether Iraq had reconstituted a nuclear weapons program, he said, at the UN:

POWELL: There is no doubt in my mind …

That’s in public. What about in private? According to Larry Wilkerson, Powell’s chief of staff, here’s what Powell was thinking at the time:

WILKERSON: [Powell] had walked into my office musing and he said words to the effect of, ‘I wonder how we’ll all feel if we put half a million troops in Iraq and march from one end of the country to the other and find nothing.’

The attack on Iraq killed millions of Iraqis. And also killed 4,600 US citizens and wounded in action another 300,000. But don’t worry: it would spoil the mood to remember this, so everyone forgets it, and refuses to learn about the role of Biden and Pelosi in the destruction of Iraq. Just as with the attack on Afghanistan of July 3, 1979 secretly ordered by Carter, advised by Brezezinsky. Now Brezezinsky’s daughter, Mica, is married to “Morning Joe” and a pillar of well-thinking America. 

Nobody has any idea that the attack on Iraq was to shut down Iraqi production, and massively launch US fracking. The sinister duo of Bush and Obama implemented the plan, with Wall Street enthusiastic support… If you mention this, most “liberal” Americans will “cancel” you immediately, in the good old US racist tradition… It is hilarious that most young US citizens who are in the “cancel culture” don’t realize they reproduce exactly the racist, segregating methodology of their ancestors…

CNN TAPPER: Two years ago, you said we shouldn’t create a cold war situation with the Chinese. Are we in one, do you think?

POWELL: We’re in a bad situation right now, because we’re fighting over things that I don’t think we need to fight over.
The Chinese did not do well at the very beginning of this virus crisis. But, at the same time, it was our intelligence community that was telling the administration, telling the president, beginning in December, through January, February, March, that we had this.”

So Powell is changing the conversation… and, as far as I know, lying, as there is no evidence intelligence said anything. The problem with China is not so much China, but sending all the jobs and inventions there. The jobs, everybody knows about, but the upper middle class doesn’t care…. The inventions? That subtilty is above the understanding of 99% of US citizens, as Obama, under the advice of plutocrats he then decorated, sabotaged the US Patent System, to make the Chinese one superior. Yes, so devious, trust that Obama the half-wit (for a US president) had no idea what he was doing… He made discourse saying he was “fighting trolls”….

“Black” police officers being rude to white PC woman trying to master gravity on the right

 Demonstrations all over the USA accusing… “racism”. When actually what’s at fault is an evil organization of a plutocratic society. Now right, numbers don’t lie, and the US is a racist country on the face of it, because people are asked, by the state, for their “race”, so they can behave racial… something which, in the case of many “blacks” is like asking them if their ancestors resented those who were not enslaved, etc. In truth there is enormous violence in US society and “racist” turmoil is just a cover-up. From 1960 to 2010, thanks to the Biden crime bill of 1994, the rate of incarceration of blacks tripled. OK, let me quote from The Economist I am subscribed to, and which, being global plutocratic in nature, absolutely hates Trump (a theme this week led by Paul Krugman, is to say that Trump is “much much worse than Nixon… So I saw that appear in many newspapers, and with roughly the same words in The Economist… demonstrating that this sort of campaign is coordinated… such as when Trump talk about Isonomia, and said “George” would be pleased to see all the demonstration, and the Pluto press transformed this in Trump boasting about employment numbers).


Since 2000, the number of poor Americans who live in areas of concentrated poverty (defined as places where more than a fifth live below the federal poverty line) has increased by 57%. And black children are seven times as likely as white children to experience this more corrosive form of poverty.

Concentrated disadvantage becomes deeper disadvantage. Social scientists have compiled a mountain of evidence linking life in such neighbourhoods to worse outcomes for health, education, income and risk of incarceration. To live in segregated areas plagued with poverty and violence for generations is to experience continuous loss of opportunity. And it can corrode democratic cohesion as well, by creating separate spheres of race and class—one for “us” and one for “them”.

Three important social indicators for black men have also worsened over the past half-century, even as out-and-out racial animus has declined. Joblessness has become more common. In 1972 nearly 80% of black men above the age of 20 were in the labour force. That rate dropped slowly but substantially over the ensuing decades to 67% on the eve of covid-19, and then to 63% now. The share of births to unmarried couples has increased from nearly 40% to 70%. These family arrangements are highly unstable; about 70% will have broken up five years after a child is born. And incarceration has risen to extraordinary levels. Between 1960 and 2010, it more than tripled for black men.

The three phenomena are interrelated in a complex way. But they probably account for much of the observed extraordinary downward mobility of black boys compared with black girls or whites. Black boys born to families in the top 1% of the income distribution are as likely to go to prison as white boys born in the bottom third.

Notice The Economist forgot to say Biden did this, the 300% higher incarceration rate. Black Lives Matter is against the 1994 Biden law. It is not reasonable to suppose his author will demolish it. So how long will this comedy last? That crook, Bernie Sanders (I voted for him twice) lost to Biden, because he didn’t want to “go negative”. So when talking heads egg him to say something negative about Biden and Iraq, Sanders deflected the question into grotesquely irrelevant directions. That means Sanders knew that Biden is guilty as hell in the attack on Iraq, so he carefully evaded the subject, as had been fixed in advance [1]. A man kills millions though lies, and one doesn’t want to “go negative”. Why not treat Hitler the same way? Did Sanders’ ancestors treat Hitler the same way? One can suspect they did. But it’s because millions of US Jews and dozens of millions of US citizens didn’t want to “go negative” on Hitler, that France was defeated, and “The Holocaust” made possible.

The US leadership is a long story of plutocracy in the last 106 years… But its biggest crimes have escaped, not just prosecution, but even examination. If one mentions the general direction, one is immediately accused of “conspiracy theory”. Because the first thing a US citizen in good standing believes, and advertises, is that there was never a conspiracy in the history of the North American English theory. We are all apolitical here, nothing to see, and they bleat.

Patrice Ayme



[1] Sanders hid his refusal to really hurt Biden as deserved, under this state of ridiculous anger and indignation, a great rage roaring, signifying nothing, except total approbation for the Biden master puppet role. BTW, Sanders has always been for guns (he foams at the mouth in Vermont, which has lots of hunting)… However, handguns can kill police, so only police should have the right to own them. Lots of the US police brutality is directly attributable to police fear of being shot (several did, one dead, yesterday in Santa Cruz mountains… So Bay Area got at least two officers killed in a week or so, by bullets). A white person I know once was stopped for a bogus traffic violation. She dug for her papers in the trunk of her car: several police officers had been called first, and she was informed they were ready to shoot. It was a white woman… So, of course, drunk black men don’t stand a chance…


4 Responses to “Hear, Hear: War Criminal Powell Will Vote Biden”

  1. Gmax Says:

    The problem is really police brutality, and as you suggested, the murder of George looked like a hit. Yet most people are not rational. An upper fringe of the black population exploits the racist issue, they play it like a violin. That enables them to serve the 1% and thus enter them. As you said it’s a cover up for the plutocracy underneath. And that’s why it never changes. There was this black lawyer for NAAPC on 60 minutes tonight and she smiled with undisguised satisfaction when evoking George’s death. What’s wrong with these people?


  2. oatmealactivist Says:

    This is part of a concerted effort to undermine Trump’s reelection.

    The media sensationalized the coronavirus pandemic, displaying no interest in science or the dissemination of life-saving information. Instead, they stoked a panic and blamed Trump for the deaths and economy toll. (Note that the black crime rate started to rise just as the economic prospects for men of all races started to dim.)

    Then, they blamed Trump for the death of George Floyd, for the riots and response to them, and for fomenting ‘systemic racism’ and ‘white supremacy.’ (Of course, police violence towards black Americans was higher during the Obama years. And even though every death is egregious, the number of unarmed black men – and indeed men of any race – killed by police every year is quite small, hardly the relentless carnage the media would have us believe.)

    Now, they are trotting out puppets of the established plutocracy to continue the attack on Trump.

    War has been waged against the working and middle classes for decades. Wages and benefits are kept down, jobs are shipped overseas, replacement workers are shipped in.

    But the rot is deeper. The self-destructive cult of woke social justice, deeply illiberal, menacingly authoritarian and Maoist in all but name is being used by plutocrats. Look at the public confessions of sin, the denunciations, the demand for ideological uniformity and total intolerance of even a hint of dissent. No wonder the velvet glove of plutocracy is wrapping their hand tightly around this cudgel. There is nothing ‘progressive’ about a movement that seeks to criminalize free speech and rationalize real violence.

    What’s more, the woke mob is attempting to utilize this tragedy as justification to continue their assault on Western Civilization and the Enlightenment ideals that arose from it. Never let a crisis go to waste.

    Policing and criminal justice are in need of real reform. And to his credit, Trump has made some progress on this front with the First Step Act. Trump has made real overtures – frequently and vocally – to black Americans. Little wonder for the panic by Democrats and their backers.

    But real progress requires the restoration of decaying communities to the point that residents feel opportunity and optimism. And that will only ever be accomplished by attacking the vampiric plutocracy that is siphoning away trillions.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Indeed. Trump is at bay, because they say whatever, and he doesn’t help his case with idiotic missteps/tweets…
      The charge of police racism is bogus. I have seen police violence, several times, and no black was involved.
      Here is the WSJ:

      The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines “unarmed” broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.

      On Memorial Day weekend in Chicago alone, 10 African-Americans were killed in drive-by shootings. Such routine violence has continued—a 72-year-old Chicago man shot in the face on May 29 by a gunman who fired about a dozen shots into a residence; two 19-year-old women on the South Side shot to death as they sat in a parked car a few hours earlier; a 16-year-old boy fatally stabbed with his own knife that same day. This past weekend, 80 Chicagoans were shot in drive-by shootings, 21 fatally, the victims overwhelmingly black. Police shootings are not the reason that blacks die of homicide at eight times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined; criminal violence is.

      The latest in a series of studies undercutting the claim of systemic police bias was published in August 2019 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers found that the more frequently officers encounter violent suspects from any given racial group, the greater the chance that a member of that group will be fatally shot by a police officer. There is “no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police,” they concluded.

      A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. Any evidence to the contrary fails to take into account crime rates and civilian behavior before and during interactions with police.

      The false narrative of systemic police bias resulted in targeted killings of officers during the Obama presidency. The pattern may be repeating itself. Officers are being assaulted and shot at while they try to arrest gun suspects or respond to the growing riots. Police precincts and courthouses have been destroyed with impunity, which will encourage more civilization-destroying violence. If the Ferguson effect of officers backing off law enforcement in minority neighborhoods is reborn as the Minneapolis effect, the thousands of law-abiding African-Americans who depend on the police for basic safety will once again be the victims.


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: