Want Genius? Get Out Of The Gilded Box Global Plutocrats Designed


A PhD in a field X means one has done studies in X, but it also means one has PLEASED A HANDFUL of senior members of the PhD GUILD… One has entered a hierarchy. When I mixed up with the best and brightest, I was struck how hierarchical it all was [1].

The fact that professional intellectuals have to aspire to belong to a guild, to please a hierarchy to get the crumbs that feed them as the pigeons they are has the following consequence: Most great mental advances of humanity are from AMATEURS, OR INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATORS, NOT GUILDERS; it’s a historical fact. The very fact that “amateurs”, people who love a subject are viewed in a pejorative way is itself pretty telling. It is basically saying that working for love is inferior to working for a stipend: the lover is inferior to the prostitute, on matter of (prostitution?) principle. The prostitution principle makes employers the ultimate adjudicators of intellectual worth. And now the ultimate adjudicators are the global plutocrats.

I agree with Nietzsche’s analysis, but I go much deeper: the universal principles the infernal trio of those lovers of each others of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle subscribed to were the universal principles of plutocracy against democracy. Plutocracy is intrinsically for mental fascism: deriving everything from a few principles which serve the owners. Socrates, heir of a small fortune, lived like a whore for wealthier than him. Plato, a gilded youth of Athens, aspired to be the Syracuse tyrant’s boyfriend, and Aristotle, a spawn of the innermost circle of the Macedonian tyrant, was the mastermind of the takeover of the world by his Macedonian students. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, are the evil artisans of the ultimate plutocratic box. The consequences were dramatic: ARISTOTLE DESTROYED DEMOCRACY

Yes, ARISTOTLE DESTROYED DEMOCRACY, by building the box nobody was supposed to get out of [2]

It is true that individuals who, while members of the PhD GUILD do not follow the dogmas of the guild, are described as “fringe” and dangerous radicals, and lower order sorts. I was long around the highest top circles in math-physics and I noticed the very highest (Nobel, Field medal ranks) were less arrogant than the ones below them…  The very top guys (De Broglie, Feynman, Wheeler, etc.) were just the opposite, humble and frank. But very consumed by their narcissistic selves…

The intrinsic nature of genius means one is out of the box: the box is not a genius, it’s a prison: new ideas come always from the outside, not the stampeding herd. So the very definition of genius implies asocial behavior towards the GUILDS. 

This can be seen even in individuals such as ABELARD and BURIDAN, Middle Ages super thinkers who were the equivalent of celebrity rock stars in their times… So they were very famous. Abelard led the war against Saint Bernard, the de facto Pope and a crazed advocate of the 2nd Crusade; two centuries later, Buridan, rector of the world’s most famous university, Paris, advised four kings and was loved by a queen, etc… and also had a gigantic following, including the Oresemes, Oxford computing school… They were very famous but still they rocked the boat… Both fought the power of the church in a way which required extreme courage.

An example of resistance of dogma to significant fact is Dark Matter: the evidence for it is nearly a century old, but it was denied… It is a highly significant fact, as it means, POTENTIALLY, that existing physics is 96% IRRELEVANT. As an amateur of sorts, I found an obvious (?) POTENTIAL solution: a finite Quantum Interaction (there is no Quantum Interaction if CIQ, Copenhagen Interpretation Quantum… But I am sure Newton would agree with me, because he wrote on the subject, famously about gravity).

The problem with the identification of the PhD and UNIVERSITY EMPLOYED GUILD with the top intellectual class is that universities, and “university affiliation” are that universities are all in the employ of the top plutocratic class and its agent, the GLOBAL DEEP STATE… This enables the Global Deep State to establish its worldwide mind control.

An example is so-called “French Theory” an all-encompassing philosophical theory, which has been interpreted as saying that there is nothing as a superior cultural trait. Believing in the superiority of some system of thoughts over others is… racist.

Thus, in particular, claiming that “All Lives Matter” is racist.

Wait… what? Ah, because the founding members of “French Theory”, like the ignorant and, or, biased Claude LéviStrauss (a French anthropologist and ethnologist founder of “French Theory”) believed that the West rose on mayhem, and, implicitly, only mayhem… This has been parroted and amplified ever since, in an avalanche of Black Lies. And Black Lies Matter!

Whereas, in truth, the West rose on… Amateur geniuses… certainly the USA, a colony of Europe, rose on much more mayhem than necessary, but that’s another story.

The Occident arose from the creative destruction of yesteryear’s obsolete spiritual prisons… The history of ideas is the history of jailbreaks.

Patrice Ayme

***

***

[1] Since then Zarathustra, or Nietzsche, following Descartes, himself echoing Montaigne and his “ivory tower”, will guess that I have entered a higher phase, where mixing would be akin to dilution: there is a time for the cave up high in the mountains, and the dialogue with the centuries…

***

[2] Abelard, then Buridan, did get out of the Aristotelian box, It was perceived to be so at the time. Peter the Venerable, abbot of all powerful Cluny (by far the largest Christian church at the time) protected Abelard from Saint Bernard. He called Abelard “our Aristotle”.

Tags: , , ,

15 Responses to “Want Genius? Get Out Of The Gilded Box Global Plutocrats Designed”

  1. brodix Says:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/eyewitness-agony-assange

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I think the situation with Assange is extremely grave. It is a testimony to the rage of the GLOBAL US DEEP STATE. The US DEEP STATE argues that Assange aided in the revelation of an apparent US war crime. Weird: revealing a crime shouldn’t be a crime. Now there is nothing Trump can do: much Deep State is out of elected representative control.

      Like

      • SDM Says:

        Has Trump shown any interest in saving Assange? If so, I have not seen it. Trump is more about the show and to up end the deep state by intervening on behalf of Assange would be a huge break from the deep state/establishment and a huge story. The US mainstream press have cowered away from the truth about Assange. Real journalism is near dead here.

        Like

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Trump cannot do anything for Assange or Snowden: they have to be condemned first.
          But I am sure that, should Assange be condemned (he has not been deported to the US yet; decision January 4), he would pardon him, because his own people got accused too to deal with Assange. However, that scenario will come out only if Trump gained re-election, and a long time from now. Deep Statists know all of this, and they feel very confident. They hate Trump because he interferes with their murderous, and highly profitable, not to say exciting, interference.

          NYT has sunk to the level of grotesque propaganda. It has got BORING. I really question my morality of keeping on sending them money. I fully expect an article explaining we shouldn’t have an election, because Trump already lost in the polls.

          Like

          • SDM Says:

            It has been reported that former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has spoken out recently on behalf of Assange, calling for charges against him be dropped, and likewise for Snowden. http://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-julian-assange.
            If she can do so, why not Trump?

            Like

          • Patrice Ayme Says:

            We saw what happened when Att. General Barr dropped charges against the general Flynn who had done nothing…

            The GLOBAL DEEP STATE is all over: the Brits have hounded Assange for 8 years. Nothing to do with Trump. If Trump had tried anything, he would have failed, they would hold that against him even more. British judges protect their own career, and it’s relative to UK DEEP STATE (my spouse is a UK lawyer, among other things, so I know a few things…)

            Like

          • SDM Says:

            See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUuOWg_G0g4 for Jimmy Dore’s podcast asserting that US government being run by war criminals, including Biden. The word is out but will anyone listen past TDS? Trump is a poster boy for bad behavior but not a war criminal- he wouldn’t even fight in Vietnam. He may not stand up against white supremacists or neo-fascists but he has lashed out against plutocrats- as opposed to plutocracy.

            Like

  2. benign Says:

    Bill Gates

    Like

  3. ronaldscheckelhoff Says:

    “New revelations often come from outside the GUILD.” Yes – I’d agree, even tho I’m not directly connected with any GUILD, and see them only in the light of the abstractions created by whatever the media feeds me. But, I’d guess it’s similar to overly-large corporations that become entrenched by some philosophy held by the powers that rule them – so they end up buying new innovation from smaller firms, or just buy the smaller firms themselves. One might see a GUILD as a giant uber-alles corporation, I suppose.

    As far as quantum mechanics goes, its explanation for entanglement is ridiculous. If the aether is a plasma, then under many normal conditions it could be “invisible”. Any connecting link that represented entanglement and utilzed the aether might then also be invisible. It could be that simple.

    Two beams (one microwave, one laser) can be entangled by allowing them to simultaneously impinge upon a membrane that fits both wavelengths geometrically. This is proven. IMO – it is simple elastic deflection and subsequent transfer of exactly one wavelength of momentum to the paired beam, and vica-versa. It screams out “SIMPLE MECHANICAL” – but not many have that opinion but me.

    Each wavelength carries exactly the same amount of momentum as any other wavelength, which is what makes it work like a ping-pong game.

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      The fact the Nobel in physics was given to my friend Roger Penrose, is encouraging. He was long viewed as “FRINGE”.
      As I said we talked, long ago, when I was still among humans, so to speak, about OBJECTIVE COLLAPSE. His version followed something already published closely. Collapse from the gravitational field.
      My version is more… ethereal: the collapse is due to the matter fields themselves. So I am simpler, more general, and more in tune of what is going on inside a Quantum Computer…

      Now I am sorry if you tried to explain this to me already, do you have a reference for the entanglement you speak about? You probably sent it, but I am a scattered brain…. What strikes me is that nobody talks about interference of independent, one photon at a time lasers: that demonstrates the reality of matter waves…

      Like

      • ronaldscheckelhoff Says:

        Just google the keywords microwave, laser, and membrane to grab a whole slew of posts and papers about this subject. It’s being used heavily in commercial firms already. It’s scary as hell, acutally.

        You mentioned your “censorship” as both overt and grey-ban style in this and other of your posts. I feel I am under the same sort of censorship (but less overt) – due to my postings on quantum mechanics and the downsides therein (i.e. singularity, etc).

        Elon Musk says our greatest fear is AI. I disagree. Our greatest fear is quantum (aether) entanglement and the regular old humans who manipulate it. Besides, both quantum computing and eventuall AI will be based on entanglement. The simple membrane tests are the motive for my belief that we’ve already had a quantum computer for quite some time. It’s likely being used to break encryption already.

        Like

        • ronaldscheckelhoff Says:

          In my view the collapse is simply when the ping-pong runs out of gas, because the aether is almost but not quite a “zero friction” medium. All electronics is really about crossing medium boundaries. My quantumextinction page has more if you’re interested.

          Like

          • Patrice Ayme Says:

            Will try to find time to have a look…
            For me there is no aether, but there is absolute space… De facto particles spreading their matter wave, amoeba like, at the speed of TAU (speed in absolute space, TAU>> 10^23 c) make a de facto ether. So the aether becomes a statistical thing, complete with thermodynamics… So aether my way is a bit like a gas made of matter waves…
            Because TAU is >>>>>> 10^23 c, there is no contradiction with Relativity…

            Like

        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          The censorship is real and extremely scary. I totally panicked a week ago when, with the help of professionals, it was found my communications for publications were 100% intercepted. When I log in some sites, I am sent somewhere else unknown. Thursday my “DO IRAQI LIVES MATTER?” essay was hacked and replaced by something else… When I tried to reinstate a simpler version of it, I was blocked… The censors then went to bed, or got busy with another account… I also saw what FB did… But I have big time lawyer friends who told me to cut the crap, lay low, otherwise I should be ready to leave within 24 hours…

          BTW that my friend Penrose got the Nobel is encouraging: he is of the objective QUANTUM collapse school… It may well be that we have more advanced Quantum Computers than the government admits… HOWEVER, Q computing is based on tricks. In the case of electronics, transistors existed already in the 1920s (Germany, with… Germanium…) So there was no big secret (Churchill thought there was, he was naive). The real surprise was the nuclear bomb… Irene Curie found the trick in 1937… But then there were further tricks: Boron to slow down nucleons, and then the discovery and fabrication of Plutonium…

          My point: there is no glorious trick out there yet… There are already Q computers but they use different tricks.. None of them shattering…

          Like

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: