Kill Nuclear Tyranny Before It’s Too Late


Abstract: Putin’s collaborators say that we should submit to him, because he threatened to destroy us. Wisdom says the opposite: we should get rid of Putin, because he threatened to destroy humanity. 80 years after Auschwitz, that should not be too hard to understand.

***

International law and the United Nations recognize that “war of aggression is the ultimate crime against humanity“… Why? Precisely because war of aggression entails many other crimes against humanity.

Recognizing this after World War Two, the International Tribunal established jurisprudence: those who launch wars are the worst criminals. Putin committed the ultimate crime. (To this Putin collaborators write a fake history where reality is inverted, or invented.) 

Thus, some Nazi leaders were executed “just” for promoting or enabling the Nazi war of aggression (Rosenberg, Von Ribbentrop, among others).

The concept that war of aggression was the ultimate crime was a recent development: World War Two became the massacre it was precisely because only France and the UK viewed it this way. In 1939, 1940, France, Britain (and their colonies) fought alone against Nazism.

Actually the treacherous US president and Nazifying US Congress applied sanctions against France and Britain for attacking the Nazis! Wunderbar! Result: At least 17 million civilians were assassinated in extermination camps, 100 million dead overall (as Japan felt it could get away with invading China, where it killed 40 millions).

***

By September 1 1939, the pattern of Hitler attacking and invading other countries was established. As Hitler refused to stop his invasion of Poland, France and Britain declared war. Soon Russia joined Hitler in his attack on Poland, and, by November 1939, Russia invaded Finland. Afterwards, thanks to Russian oil and other resources, Hitler was able to conquer Europe, but for Britain, protected by the sea, and Hitler’s collaborators: Sweden (big time), Switzerland, and Spain.

This time the invasive Russian autocrat, perhaps encouraged by the Afghan debacle and his 6,500 nuclear weapons, has attacked rather alone: China’s autocrat, Mr. Xi may have second thoughts about the “unlimited friendship”, so no Hitler to help out, and 42 democracies have allied themselves materially with the Ukrainian democracy, constituting, de facto, a super-NATO… Against the tyran brandishing with relish the extinction of humanity, lest he gets his wayand that is, to invade countries when he feels like it, or when he thinks they are not real, or should not exist. 

Pathetically, some naively argue that, precisely because Putin wants very much to kill us all, with nuclear bombs, we should surrender to him, and not irritate him in any way…. Those who know better the history of tyranny through the ages, will draw the opposite conclusion from the same facts… If you share a cage with a furious, hungry tiger, it does not matter how much you try to pet him: he will end up eating you (this has happened for real more than once). The cage we share is this planet. 

Russia’s dictatorship was losing the war of the Open Society, and the more it closed itself up, the more it lost. So it went all the way down the royal road to fascism, hoping for the best, and now settling for not as good right away. 

The Kremlin nuclear tyrant has many collaborators, worldwide, carrying his propaganda as if he was a nuclear Jesus. This propaganda is now becoming the most important part of Putin’s war effort. What Putin hopes is that his propaganda will undermine the long term effort of the 42 democracies opposing his dictatorship.

Indeed, those collaborators are motivated: Putin has proven generous in the past with his collaborators. Putin’s collaborators disseminate lies which fuel the sort of sympathy the Nazis weaponized for years. Much of the ephemeral victories of the Nazis, in 1936-1940 were made possible by National-Socialist propganda, which was very similar to Putin’s. That propaganda was particularly effective in France, as the French Communist Party was under the orders of Moscow, itself secretly, and then officially, collaborating with the Nazis. The result was that most new French fighter planes did not receive their armament (the military high command was afraid it would be seized by Nazi/Soviet collaborators). During the fatal week of May 10, 1940, France therefore couldn’t put in the air enough fighters. 

The Kremlin nuclear tyrant fosters lies, such as Ukraine not allowing COVID vaccines (it allows six, including those allowed in the US and EU), or Ukraine closing TV stations (Putin propaganda stations also closed in the EU), or being vengeful against a past treacherous president (a Putin collaborator who violated the Ukrainian constitution, caused deaths, and is the object of national and international warrants of arrest from judicial proceedings) …

However, this is the Armageddon struggle between nuclear tyrnaical terror and the open democratic society: only the latter can be sustained on a small planet.   

A first Russian officer, 21 year old, is on trial for killing a civilian. There are several witnesses, including other Russian soldiers, who were arrested with him. The officer admitted his guilt, apparently an act of madness, as he and other soldiers were fleeing after commandeering a car, consecutive to the destruction of their armored vehicles.

Evidence for thousands of war crimes is being gathered in Ukraine, by many countries, the UN and even French military war crime specialist units (NATO boots on the ground!) There is a precedent in Bosnia and Serbia of arresting war criminals who led countries and states. 

***

Besides repeating absurd lies on facts, Putin collaborators try to distract public opinion by points of detail, or by exhibiting a complete lack of an ethical core, a moral desert… presented as the epitome of wisdom.

It will not work this time. If the second world war had been won in 1939-1940, few would have died. It was not won, because France and Britain fought Germany, Russia/USSR, Japan and Italy in 1940, plus very bad luck. This time it’s just one fascist dictatorship against 42 democracies, which reacted promptly, this time.

History does not always repeat itself as stupidly as before. Civilization can learn, and does.

Have to do world war against a rogue nuclear armed tyranny? Do it early, before the nuclear tyrant has subjected too many minds with abject infamy.

Putin delendus est!

Patrice Ayme

 

The cartoon of Stalin and Hitler killing Poland was drawn on September 20, 1939. So some US citizens had a fair idea of what was going on. At the time, Britain had basically no army, so France was facing basically alone the coalition of Germany, Italy, Japan and the USSR. Hitler used massive Soviet resources to invade France… and the Soviet fifth column or threat thereof.

***

In an eerie repeat of history, Russia’s Ambassador to Venezuela claimed that   the Soviet Union did not invade Poland on Sept 17, 1939 and that it was in fact Poland, not the USSR, that collaborated with Nazi Germany.  His explanation of how half of what was then Poland came to be under Soviet occupation is similar to the arguments of Russian liar Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine.

Ambassador Vladimir Zayemsky’s delirium appeared in “Correo del Orinoco” on Sunday, Sept 20, 2015, under the title “The Truth as Historical Imperative”.   This venal character pretends that there has been an increase in attempts to attribute “supposed” crimes during the Second World War to the Soviet Union, and calls Poland the worst liar. A few years later, the Putin dictatorship removed memorials to some of the massacres that the USSR committed against Poland (for example Katyn, which dozens of thousands in the Polish elite).

By engaging in what he calls a campaign of lies, Russian authorities claim that Poland tries to divert attention from its own crimes during the Second World War.  Zayemsky claims that the Soviet Union did not invade Poland on Sept 17, but merely took back territory which Poland had illegally stolen. However Polish territory was settled internationally in Versailles in 1919, when Poland was made free from the German occupier.

Reality is that the Soviet Union invaded Poland, without a declaration of war, on Sept 17, 1939.  This was according to the Secret Protocol to the USSR-Naziland, Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of Aug 23, 1939. Two months later, the Kremlin tyranny invaded Finland. Nine days later, the USSR was kicked out of the League of Nations…

Tags: , ,

13 Responses to “Kill Nuclear Tyranny Before It’s Too Late”

  1. J M Hatch Says:

    They fought alone only after throwing Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland under the bus, and in the case of Poland, only after failing to incite Poland and Germany to set aside their differences and work together to defeat the USSR.
    I don’t recall any of these leaders getting the noose for conspiring to make an illegal war of aggression. Oddly enough, according to that UN definition, if NAZI Germany had just stopped at German and Austrian Jews, then that’s not so bad a crime, sort of like one of Uncle Sam’s other clients, Pol Pot.

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      A mostly fanciful, Kremlin directed, view of history. Putin is a mighty guy: his oligarchic system posted sympathisers around the world, propagandizing weird alternate histories. I like the allusion to Hungary, which makes no sense whatsoever.

      That Britain wanted Germany and Poland to become allies and defeat the USSR? There is something to it, in 1934 (Germany and Poland became allies), or 1935 (Britain and Germany became allies through the Naval Treaty).

      However, France never contemplated any alliance with Hitler. Just the opposite: US and French relations became execrable after 1933, because France wanted to get rid of Hitler, and Washington wanted to keep him.

      By 1936, the UK understood the error, threw her Nazi king out. In 1939, the UK aligned herself behind France in the Polish defense treaty (in the appendix). The invasion of Austria and Czechoslovakia were peaceful… Not so Spain in 1936, but the UK and US discourage France to react, all the more as she was led by a peaceful Socialist Jew… The reasoning was made, as with many Putin collaborators now, not to send weapons to make war worse…

      Like

  2. russian_bot Says:

    “However, France never contemplated any alliance with Hitler.” – as I recall in his “The Gathering Storm” Churchill put a lot of blame on France’s perpetual internal political fights effectively making it impotent in coming up with any meaningful action against Hitler’s rise. Not that Churchill was kind towards the UK of that same period, either.

    He called it “the unnecessary war” didn’t he? Since the pre-conditions could have been easily nipped in the bud in the early 30’s.

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Churchill’s shenanigans are worthy of a very long book. He long had pro-fascist, pro-German positions, threatening comically to bomb France in 1929, because France was getting very angry about secret German-Russian collaboration in violating the Versailles Treaty by rearmement and training in Russia. Churchill was completely wrong about the details of the rearmament of Britain…

      Chamberlain did it right: wait for the new fighter planes, Hurricanes and Spitfires, and the new Lancaster bomber. Instead, Churchill wanted to mass produce obsolete planes.

      The strategic problem France had was that the US leadership was pro-Hitler (not officially, but in reality). So was the UK leadership, until 1936. France was not going to go to war with her child, the US, or her other child, ex-vassal and fellow Medieval superpower, England. So France had to wait until at least Britain was ready to fight Hitler. Thus the US was able to betray both her parents, in 1939, and 1940!

      The UK aligned herself fully with France only after the fall of Spain, April 1, 1939, and the UK was added to the addendum of the Franco-Polish defense treaty. .

      France lost a battle of France in the second week of May 1940 because of the accumulation of many miracles which favored the Nazis, and also because the Nazis tried something so crazy, bursting through the Ardennes, it was bound to fail… Except if nobody thought it would work.

      Treason from the ex-king, and French Stalinian Commies, was also on Hitler’s side. No wonder after that Hitler thought fate was on his side, whatever he did. On paper, France and Britain should have crushed the NazisChurchill’s shenanigans are worthy of a very long book. He long had pro-fascist, pro-German positions, threatening comically to bomb France in 1929, because France was getting very angry about secret German-Russian collaboration in violating the Versailles Treaty by rearmement and training in Russia. Churchill was completely wrong about the details of the rearmament of Britain…

      Chamberlain did it right: wait for the new fighter planes, Hurricanes and Spitfires, and the new Lancaster bomber. Instead, Churchill wanted to mass produce obsolete planes.

      The strategic problem France had was that the US leadership was pro-Hitler (not officially, but in reality). So was the UK leadership, until 1936. France was not going to go to war with her child, the US, or her other child, ex-vassal and fellow Medieval superpower, England. So France had to wait until at least Britain was ready to fight Hitler. Thus the US was able to betray both her parents, in 1939, and 1940!

      The UK aligned herself fully with France only after the fall of Spain, April 1, 1939, and the UK was added to the addendum of the Franco-Polish defense treaty. .

      France lost a battle of France in the second week of May 1940 because of the accumulation of many miracles which favored the Nazis, and also because the Nazis tried something so crazy, bursting through the Ardennes, it was bound to fail… Except if nobody thought it would work.

      Treason from the ex-king, and French Stalinian Commies, was also on Hitler’s side. No wonder after that Hitler thought fate was on his side, whatever he did. On paper, France and Britain should have crushed the Nazis.

      Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Why Did France Cease Fire With Nazis June 22, 1940?

      Like

  3. J M Hatch Says:

    Jozef Pilsudski Poland and Hitler Germany were urged into cooperation by USA, UK, etc to take on USSR in a near mirror of the current proxy war in Ukraine, financed by London and Wall Street.

    Also money men like Henry Ford and JP Morgan agents were fluttering between Berlin and Warsaw. Ford was particularly hot to trot, he early on sold a truck manufacturing license to the USSR for gold to build his empire, but was becoming alarmed at their productive capacity.

    Even Churchill got frustrated with Poland when Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly replaced the expired Pilusdski, Churchill’s famous remark about Poland being greedy wasn’t just about Czechoslovakia, Poland had already taken land twice from USSR as Lenin then Stalin bought time, and Polish elite thought they didn’t need to cooperate (and share) with Germany to take even more. France would dither between encouraging attacking USSR to joining to defeat Germany. A time of scheming idiots.

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      The most prominent characters and events in all this were the plutocratic railroad heirs, the US Harriman brothers, who basically came to rule Stalin thanks to the (re) development of the Baku oil fields and their offshore assets. One of them got the top medal from both Hitler and Stalin, an unequalled feat. In 1941, US lend lease to Stalin kept the USSR afloat, in part because of US trucks.

      Why Did France Cease Fire With Nazis June 22, 1940?

      Like

    • russian_bot Says:

      There was no doubt for anybody that the eventual goal for Hitler was the Soviet Union as he was never ambiguous about it, from his very start. And since the USSR was already a pariah state at the time anyone in Europe and the US was looking forward to it. Didn’t turn out exactly as they would have liked but then when does it ever.

      Like

  4. J M Hatch Says:

    every nation and it’s people twist history, is France unique?

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      There is mostly mono-thinking in the US. An example is the march to the Iraq invasion of 2003. The French secret services (in particular the DGSE) disagreed completely with their US colleagues that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction… The 17 US secret services were anxious to foster the invasion case as ordered by president Bush.
      So French president Chirac was told by the US Iraq had WMDs, while French secret services said it was not the case.

      In general, the French are of the following persuasion: VIVE LA DIFFERENCE! Difference, for the French is both cult, religion, and appreciation. It is the CORE of French culture. Difference makes Americans, Russians, Germans, Sunni or Shiah Muslims, even Catholics or US universities… nervous and condemning…

      In the interpretation of history, then, we find considerable difference. Compare Foucault and Mauriac, Camus and Sartre… Whereas the US has one Noam Chomski, France has hundreds, and many in position of power, including the just nominated education minister, Ndaye, born of a Senegalese father, a woke fanatic. France herself doesn’t know her own history, while I do, of course…
      https://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2015/05/10/a-truth-france-outlawed-slavery-1355-years-ago/

      Like

  5. Patrice Ayme Says:

    The French army deployed Gendarmerie Nationale boots on the ground in April 2022, north west of Kyiv. The French army forensic teams, with doctors and specialists, roughly two dozens strong, were, and are, inquiring on war crimes in Irpin and Bucha. The military scientists were accompanied by an armed protection force from GIGN. So NATO had armed boots on the ground in Ukraine for quite a while…. and the nuclear sky did not fall.

    The more Kremlin tyrant Putin threatens humanity, the more humanity in general, and representative democracy in particular, should fight back! Fear of nuclear war from an unhinged nuclear tyrant is the most abject fear there is. Of all the fears, the most terrible is that which will make us prefer slavery to risk.

    Like

  6. Gmax Says:

    Don’t you get tired talking to Russian bots? Those guys are outrageous. Like claiming Ukraine doesn’t allow COVID vaccines?

    Those guys just repeat Russian propaganda. Like that caitlin Johnstone, the Australian super blogger of Putin venom the US left is enamored with, is on the RT payroll…

    Like

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I know. Not only she is on the payroll, but they write her articles, transmitting faithfully the latest mad Kremlin elucubrations…

      Unfortunately, as you many have notice, many of the esteemed commenters on this site are 100% pro-Putin, repeating word for word the Kremlin. They don’t bother to control their sources, or are culturally incapable of figuring out the Putin tyranny…

      Also good guys like Glenn Greenwald are obviously on Putin payroll too… Money has a quality of its own…

      Like

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: