Abstract: Human existence is more absolute than absurd.
***
Simplicia: Existentialism, a philosophical and cultural movement. emphasizes individual existence, freedom, and choice, arguing that individuals must create their own meaning and purpose in life, rather than relying on external sources of meaning or authority. Why does it irritate you?
Tyranosopher: I do agree with much of existentialism, whenever it’s practical and short range, quotes here and there. It’s a huge body of thinking, and much of it is disparate and good. However I condemn it when existentialism turns into metaphysics which talks with as much certainty as the Bible… and engages in what I would call absurdism, libertism, wokism, fakery… Much of the decline of the West is related to the rise of existentialism, a form of nihilism
Simplicia: Libertism? Is that a neologism?
Tyranosopher: Yes, it’s the mood of believing we are free to be whatever we want to be. …because god is dead, existentialists often add. Dotstoievsky was already infected, having one of his heroes declare: “If God is dead everything is permitted”. Well, no, not everything is permitted because there is such a thing as human ethology. Absolute morality exists. Wagner PMC kills children in Ukraine, precisely because doing so is an intrinsic atrocity.
Nietzsche seems to have found Dostoievsky to be pure genius. Political practitioners of libertism were Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Putin.
Sartre puts it similarly, parroting Dostoevsky: “There is no human nature, since there is no god to conceive it…” “ Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself.” in Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism and Human Emotions.
This is all very silly, and much less observant than, say, Sade, who looked at nature as it is, or even Middle Age Catholic theologians debating the problem of “grace”… namely how free we really are… ..
Simplicia: How do we get from existentialism to wokism?
Tyranosopher: I do agree with much of wokism. However not when it conflicts with realism and reality. That we can create our own reality flies in the face of physical and cultural evidence: one can strive for originality, as a moral principle, but that’s about it. Nietzsche believed that the Will To Power was supreme… But in truth anybody with a modicum of natural adventures knows that the Will To Survive is paramount.
This was a general mood in the Nineteenth Century that will was everything. It gave us Nazism.
A funny case happened when a party of elite climbers tried to make the first ascent of the Cervin/Cervino/Matterhorn from the west, by using a snow chute. What could go wrong? As they approached the top in a warm afternoon, the gully gave way, and the proud ascensionists went down the entire mountain, which is a mile in elevation above its western glacier, in a dreadful joyride. Unbelievably, the leader emerged from the snow and found his companion strangling from the rope. When they recovered, the two heroes, undeterred, instead of thanking the appropriate divinity, shook their bloody fists, and threatened the mountain telling it they would be back for another fight…(I once was struck by a rock avalanche some miles to the west, and I quit really big mountain climbing… Because I know will is not everything.)
Existentialism has a good, localized version, most practiced, and an overreaching version, which is most talked about, and thus influential.
As a metaphysics, Existentialism focuses on human individual experience, subjectivity, rather than objective reality or universal truths. Erecting themselves from this unreal foundations of make-belief, existentialist thinkers often explore themes such as the meaning of life, the nature of existence, and the experience of anxiety, despair, and death.
Some of the key figures associated with existentialism include Jean-Paul Sartre, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, and Albert Camus. Existentialism had a significant impact on literature, art, and popular culture… In politics, it was associated with anti-colonialism, another name for disengagement of Europe with much of the world, as it imploded under the pressure of larger empires.
Simplicia: You are not afraid of sounding crazy and like a paleo-colonialist .
Tyranosopher: Reality is brutal, much of the time. China is replacing Europe in Africa, helping to develop it. Where China goes, GDP goes up. Kamala Harris, US VP went to Africa: she brought songs. Africans despised her: the Chinese bring loans and engineers as the Europeans used to.
Europeans, having been influenced by Sartre and company too much, say: this is good, we have to leave Africa, we are not into colonialism anymore. However, in most places, the old approach to Africa by Europeans was similar to the present Chinese one, with the detail that the countries were not independent. Neglecting Africa and inviting China and the Russian Private military Corporation Wagner is both racist and strategically idiotic.
Simplicia: Sartre, Camus are long dead, accusing them of present events….
Tyranosopher: Yes, but those “existentialists” set-up the anti-European mood. Watch the Camus “hero” kill an Arab, just because he got a sun stroke. Yes, let’s give the Nobel for this Noble act.
Like most European existentialists philosophers, Sartre, Camus and their parrots were “anti-colonialist”… And they didn’t even know what it was supposed to mean. De Gaulle, who was president, and some French socialist ministers of the Fourth French Republic admitted that they were anti-colonialist… Because they didn’t like Africa and a hospital every 100 kms cost too much. At least they were authentic. De Gaulle was honest when he said he didn’t like mosques. Well, I don’t like much of Islam, same as Catholicism, but I like mosques… And cathedrals or churches…
Camus finally saw the danger and that the FNL in Algeria would behave as it did. But then he died in a car crash. A high level KGB officer said it was an assassination, the car had been sabotaged, because the USSR very much wanted Algeria to be controlled by their own thing, the FNL, a terrorist organization… Remember the invasion of Ukraine?
Simplicia: You are giving me vertigo. I know what you are going to say next, the Americans were on it too.
Tyranosopher: Of course. You can see it with the Ukraine war: the US is basically tying up Europe in long term military contracts which will last several decades. European independence is not something the US like. AUKUS, the betrayal of the submarine contract by Biden, was a way to de-fang France militarily, at least in the Pacific, and industrially.
Algeria + France, as a sort of Mediterranean Brazil, what Camus wanted, would have been, and used to be, more powerful than one more terrorist dictatorship in Africa anxious to sell its fossil fuels while France concentrates on luxury products.
The existentialist movement has sweetened the bitter pill of ex-European colonies (Russia, USA) and China taking over, in a deal with Western plutocrats.
What is called the “culture wars” where, for example, biological XY men pretend to be XX women so they can become wealthy and famous are often direct attacks against reality, and the sense of how to ascertain reality.
This attack against reality has finally been understood by much of US public opinion, starting a bit with Obama, and more with Trump, and now full blast with Biden. This is why the US is re-industrializing. Macron wants the same in France.
Simplicia: Existentialism gave wokism, fakery, the illusion that we could be whatever we dreamed to be, and thus Europe lost her grip on reality, and so does the US.
Tyranosopher: In case of high intensity warfare, France could hold two days, and the USA, a week, before running out of crucial ammunition. Putin and Xi know this. By comparison, and Putin didn’t know this, Ukraine had roughly a year of stock, for artillery and tanks’ shells or anti-aircraft rockets (SA 300 and Buk)…
Europe and the US persuaded themselves that the genocidal Putin of 1999 could become a sheep if they just imagined him to be a sheep. They had to imagine Putin to be a sheep. This is a direct meta-psychological consequence of Camus:”Il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux.”
This is all absurd. Camus’ absurdism helps us to swallow this. After all the universe is absurd, says Camus, so why not having an absurd Europe too? Absurd in all ways? Non-absurdism would instead insist that democracies be better armed than their opponents.
Absurdism, pretending that the universe is absurd, makes We The People tolerant of the Absurd. For example taxes in France are the highest, but we are told that’s out of justice, redistribution. So how come the wealthiest man, and the wealthiest woman (unrelated) are French? And that’s no accident: families dominate the French stock exchange. Why, how? Because, as in the US, billionaires’ advocates write the French taxation laws, and redistribute money from the Middle Class to the possessing classes….
If the universe is absurd, absurd protests are how to be universal. Hence the protest against France working more: 23 million workers there, 17 million paid retirees… In their absurdities, the protesters don’t see that, the less they work, the less power they have…
Simplicia: Are we done with the far-out stuff?
Tyranosopher: Not quite. The information space is like the universe in physics, and for the exact same reason: it is curved and even twisted (precise math for both; spacetime in General Relativity has zero torsion). Camus is standing at a point in this information universe. So when Camus played God and claimed he knows the whole thing, and it’s absurd, he didn’t realize there was this curvature and torsion, and he can’t say anything beyond what is called the exponential radius….
Simplicai: Amen. As Plato said at the entrance of his Academia: “Nobody who doesn’t know mathematics should enter here”.
Tyranosopher: yes, it’s more true than ever, because math has progressed enormously. As aforesaid, one must use concepts extracted from the mathematics of differentiable manifolds to inform on the information space… Otherwise one misses a very important point all the existentialist philosophers, let alone all religious fanatics, have missed so far: one can’t speak beyond one’s event horizon.
Still the beauty of a philosophy, any philosophy, even Aztec philosophy, is that, even when it’s mostly wrong, it can be crucially right here and there. It’s for us readers and successors, to pick up the diamonds in the raw, and the rough.
Patrice Ayme

Camus, feeling god-like, said that the universe is indifferent. But we are not indifferent to the universe. Life is from, and part of, the universe and not indifferent. So the universe is not indifferent. Let me present you a Camus devouring crocodile, and see if Camus feels the universe is indifferent as he is being devoured.
The point? Camus’ global metaphysic, that the universe is absurd, and indifferent, is false. The worms who devoured Camus’ corpse were not indifferent to him. We, humanity, come complete with metaphysics, and that’s our human ethology. And yes we can, and already have, transmited the attached morality to AI.
Why angry against obviously false metaphysics? Because that’s what the horrendous superstitions are made off, and they held humanity back.