US Indicts Journalist Who Revealed Major US War Crime In Iraq

A new age of terror is upon us: expose US war crimes, from anywhere in the world, go to prison. US Big Brother has spoken. This is big: as I will show below, even the Nazis were not in enough control of infamy, to go that far: Nazis didn’t indict those who revealed Nazi war crimes (because Nazis didn’t want their crimes to go in front of a judge, lest they be revealed to all Germans!)

US Army Helicopter getting ready to kill those civilians. Courtesy Assange…

Says the New York Times: “Assange Indicted Under Espionage Act, Raising First Amendment Issues. Though Julian Assange is not a conventional journalist, much of what he does at WikiLeaks is difficult to distinguish in a legally meaningful way from what traditional news organizations do.”

In a NYT article by Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman, May 23, 2019:
“WASHINGTON — Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks leader, has been indicted on 17 new counts of violating the Espionage Act for his role in publishing classified military and diplomatic documents in 2010, the Justice Department announced on Thursday — a novel case that raises profound First Amendment issues.

The new charges were part of a superseding indictment obtained by the Trump administration that significantly expanded the legal case against Mr. Assange, who is already fighting extradition proceedings in London based on an earlier hacking-related count brought by federal prosecutors in Northern Virginia.

The secret documents that Mr. Assange published were provided by the former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who was convicted at a court-martial trial in 2013 of leaking the records.

“Assange, WikiLeaks affiliates and Manning shared the common objective to subvert lawful restrictions on classified information and to publicly disseminate it,” the indictment said.”


This image captured from a classified U.S. military video footage shows Iraqis being shot from an U.S. Apache helicopters that killed a dozen people in Baghdad, including two Reuters news staff on July 12, 2007, and released to Reuters on April 5, 2010 by WikiLeaks, a group that promotes leaking to fight government and corporate corruption. Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and his assistant and driver Saeed Chmagh, 40, were killed in the incident. The helicopter initially opens fire on the small group. Minutes later a van comes by, and starts assisting the wounded, and the helicopter opens fire on the van. REUTERS/WikiLeaks/Handout (IRAQ – Tags: CRIME LAW DISASTER MILITARY CIVIL UNREST

Among other things, Wikileaks revealed a US Army video of what looked like a very serious war crime: the arguably deliberate, premeditated, insistent killing, in occupied Iraq, by the US Army, of civilians who happened to be journalists and rescue personnel, over a period of several minutes.

A republic in good standing with respect to human rights, would have thanked Wikileaks, for exposing such a serious crime, and made a serious inquiry to see if crimes against humanity and crimes against the US military code of conduct had been committed.

Such an inquiry would have been an indispensable preliminary to preventing another occurrence of such crimes.

In other words, Wikileaks acted as a whistleblower.

Not satisfied with killing journalists, US Army helicopter in radio relation with headquarters, will now kill the rescuers… Photo courtesy of Assange. Now US says Assange is a spy.

Any unlawful acts on the way to commit whistleblowing should be viewed as minor, considering the gravity of the war crime they revealed: killing deliberately civilians, especially when they belong to categories which should be protected (journalists, rescuers).

The decision taken today by the US is tantamount to saying that keeping war crime secrets is of the utmost importance.

It may be good to remember that the massacre of more than 15 millions in Nazi death camps, including 6 million innocent Jewish civilians, was rendered possible by enough secrecy to enable the average Germans to claim they didn’t really know what was going on.

Without secrecy, the crimes against humanity of the Nazi regime would have been exposed, for all to see. Even Germans couldn’t have denied and the German population and military would have had to put an end to Nazism.

The same holds in roughly all regimes committing crimes against humanity: secrecy is a necessary condition to commit crimes against humanity.

So the US is now saying: we want to be able to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, unnoticed… And we will be capable of doing so, because our judicial system says that exposing such crimes is more of a crime than the crime itself.

This is coherent with the United States not being a State Party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, a permanent international criminal court to “bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide”  

The Nazis faced roughly 150 defined cases where German military personnel disobeyed direct orders, on the ground they were war crimes. Every single time, Nazi authorities counter-ordered to not prosecute the official disobedience…  Because Nazis didn’t want a case in front of a judge, even a military judge.: if they lost, there was jurisprudence. Worse: people would talk about it.

Even the Obama administration saw the validity of this approach, and didn’t prosecute Assange all the way (keeping the workings of their prosecution secret).

At least now, the US is revealed in its full war criminal glory. But, after all, isn’t it how the West was won?

Patrice Ayme

Tags: , , ,

7 Responses to “US Indicts Journalist Who Revealed Major US War Crime In Iraq”

  1. benign Says:

    Funny that you should mention the West. I am watching an excellent PBS series on Netflix, “The West,” a Ken Burns presentation, that is absolutely merciless in documenting the genocide of the Indians (it was made in 1996 when that appellation was acceptable) by the white men. Every treaty ever made with the Indians was broken, all based on lies. Highly recommended.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Allright, thanks, will do it. I actually have Netflix now… I got it and use it to watch Chinese movies (with subtitles!) with my Chinese speaking daughter….


  2. indravaruna Says:

    US learned from Israel, business as usual.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Please enlighten us a little bit further… I am aware of Netanyahu being in legal trouble for having his own pet press, paid by plutocrats… But not much more than that…


  3. Patrice Ayme Says:

    Elite US Navy Seal Edward Gallagher facing war crimes charges for killings in Iraq
    Members of his platoon were so disturbed by his behaviour they are said to have tampered with his sniper rifle to make it less accurate
    Agence France-Presse
    Published: 10:26am, 28 Apr, 2019

    Stabbing a teenage prisoner to death, picking off a young girl and an old man with a sniper rifle and firing a heavy machine gun into a residential area: these are some of the charges facing an elite US Navy Seal on trial for war crimes while deployed in Iraq.

    Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher, a decorated 39-year-old veteran of combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, is still a hero in the eyes of many Americans and his case may even become a factor in next year’s presidential elections.
    Around 40 Republican members of Congress have written an open letter demanding Gallagher – who denies the charges against him – be set free until he stands trial. One has even called on President Donald Trump to step in and have the case dismissed.
    Donald J. Trump✔@realDonaldTrump

    In honor of his past service to our Country, Navy Seal #EddieGallagher will soon be moved to less restrictive confinement while he awaits his day in court. Process should move quickly! @foxandfriends @RepRalphNorman
    5:14 AM – Mar 30, 2019


  4. ianmillerblog Says:

    The interesting thing about the material that Assange published is that the material should have led to prosecutions or disciplinary action and not classification. The idea that you can hide your misdeeds by classifying them seems to me to be illegal in itself, because in the US law it would qualify under the US Code relating to obstruction of justice. Further, everyone participating thereafter would fall into the conspiracy part of the code. (Some good has come out of the Trump fiasco after all – we should all be up with the conspiracy aspects. We need to Give Mueller a further commission!)

    The question then is, what are the courts going to do about this? Courts that participate in punishing for exposing politically damaging conspiracies follows a key step the Nazis used to get started.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Agreed to all these points which are very cogent… And that I have myself mulled for a long time (although perhaps not in writing). The cover-up here is worse than the crime… and made in plain sight. To my knowledge the initial crime was not prosecuted.

      I have long held that history is mostly the history of conspiracies… Once subtracted acts of gods like asteroid strikes and god. Even the plague can start as conspiracy: the Black Plague was deliberately set initially, or, rather amplified, by bombarding with contaminated corpses…


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: