Islam Is Islamism, And Oil Is Its Modern Prophet!

Judaism, Christianism, Islamism: Ordered By Increasing Enslavement And Violence

Abstract And Significance: Plutocrats, those who exert the power of wealth and evil, always rule sustainably through a cult. The basic methodology of crafty, sustainable class abuse is to deny not just human dignity, but respect for reason itself. So the oppressive cults tend to be violent and really stupid, by design (an example is Putinism).

Violent and really stupid, such as brandishing somebody crucified, one of the worst tortures ever devised… in the name of love and safety (this is what Christianism, does, to be clear). Christianism has been thoroughly dismissed in the advanced circles of thought… However, the plutocrats found a loophole. Christianism is now progressively replaced by a cult of mythical Islam, all good and glorious, or so the upper ones say (they use a so-called “Glorious Qur’an” which omits ALL the bad stuff from the REAL Qur’an). Although Islam adopted the symbol of the Moon from old Byzanthium, Islam is even more violent and discriminatory than Christianism and more of an insult to reason and dignity… And Christianism put the bar real high… The reason, as usual, is local plutocratic control, aggravated by the global need for oil.

Real intellectuals who want the Islamized areas to progress, be it only in the name of planetary security will point out that Islam needs to be restrained, just as Christianism was. The fanatics of the first Crusades are the brothers of Islamist Brotherhood, and for the same reason: violence in the name of a violent god (it’s the same god!) is no violence… in fanatical eyes.

So-called Islamists practicing Islamism are the true Muslims: they do according to the Qur’an, which informs us that Jews descend from apes and pigs [1]. Although Christianism, one could argue, was perverted by the Roman emperors which reconstructed it their brutal, self-serving way over three centuries, Islam was born that way, as an imperial ideology: Muhammad led an attack against the Roman empire. His friend and successor Abu Bakr ruled for only two years and two months, but thoroughly defeated both Romans and Persians…  

***  

Christianism, the religion of turning the other cheek, so one can get more of a concussion, is a slave religion imposed by latter day saints and emperors. It’s not obsolete in the sense that it gave birth to Islam, a superstition imposed by present day emperors. 

Christianism was a lie and a manipulation by the inherited plutocracy during the 16 centuries during which it dominated Europe. Something similar is affecting the area, with more than a billion people, where Islam dominates presently… And much of the exploitation actually comes from the same sort of plutocracy which terrorized and abused Europe during the Middle Ages. First let’s recapitulate the Christian situation, as Christianism was the forerunner and even promoter of early Islam.

Starting in December 380, Roman emperor Theodosius I invented the concept of heresy, a form of madness, he declares in his decrees, passible of any punishment. Theodosius said that the (Roman imperial) authorities could administer any punishment, including expropriation and death from horrendous tortures. 

When it surfaced that this so-called “Catholic Orthodoxy” was mostly an instrument of plutocrats to impose their rule of terror, revolutions and reforms were attempted, starting in the Tenth Century. The struggle against the terror church became more determined immediately after the crimes of the first crusade came to light… in the Twelfth Century.. However, thanks to Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, himself a plutocrat by inheritance and de facto leader of the Catholic church, and in spite of ferocious resistance by the philosopher Abelard and his powerful network of influencers, a second crusade was launched, and then many others… 

The struggle between reformers and the Catholic church turned into a succession of religious wars, crusades, genocides and massacres, all the way to the eighteenth century. Most notable was the annihilation of all the Cathars, five millions of them, and all their books and thoughts.

By the time of Henry VIII and even more so of the French revolution, it became clear to intellectuals that the progress of civilization demanded the extinction of the Christian church’s hold on the minds of the rabble (evolution couldn’t be taught in England until Darwin, because of the Church). That was implemented the hard way in France, where many priests were executed.

The Christian mindset made a last victim, one it had wished to do for a very long time, European Jewry… Luther hated Jews in a lethal fashion, and wrote an entire book glorifying his murderous hate. Judaism, the original form of Christianism, was Europe’s oldest surviving religion, and fell prey to the Nazis… Just because Catholicism always wanted to get rid of Judaism, but was held back at the last moment by secular authorities… When the latter became Nazi, there was no holding back. . 

***

After the French and a century later, the Brits ejected the Ottomans from their occupation of North Africa and the Middle East, Arab regimes imitated their protectors and turned secular and progressive. That was called the Nahda… the Renaissance. It lasted from the beginning of the 19th until the mid twentieth century. What caused it? Well the US, France and the UK intervened. The US to recover hostages, launching the US Marines by so doing, then Napoleon tried to emulate Alexander the Great, but was sabotaged by the UK, yet freed Egypt, and finally France conquered Algeria, a den of pirates, at least in Algiers,, arguing that it owned it all along as the successor state of Rome. By the 1930s, Egyptian women in bathing suits were a common sight. But then Islamism returned.

What happened? I have argued that oil happened. As soon as the early 1920s, Ibn Saud, by then king of Saudi Arabia, which he had conquered from the Ottomans and thanks to an alliance with Muslim Fundamentalists, an old family tradition… Ibn Saud got rid of his ardent Jihadists by revealing to the Brits their incoming attack on Jerusalem… The UK massacred them. By the 1930s, US oil men showed up, and by 1945, a deal Ibn Saud couldn’t refuse was made with the dying FDR….In a few days of military communion on the Great Bitter Lake… Give us your oil, recycle your money on Wall Street, and we will condone your religious style dictatorship… That enabled the Muslim Brotherhood, more or less founded by the Nazis, to survive and prosper…In symbiosis with the Great Bitter Lake scheme. Modern Islamism prevented the rise of modern states in North Africa and the Middle East. That was not an accident but the reason why it was activated. 

Isphahan. The main square of Isphahan is one of the world’s most beautiful places. It’s gigantic and full of fabulous mosques, I was there, and it should never be bombed, being one of the world’s greatest art extravaganza.

***

***

***

Razika Adnani is a woman which is a formal education in philosophy of Franco-Algerian nationality who specialize in Islam. She gave a long interview in the Figaro, much of it specific with Algeria and France. Here is the conclusion in a more general vein:

Why do today’s Muslim youth seem more radical than previous generations? How do we explain it?

It is certain that we are witnessing a rise in conservatism and radicalism among young Muslims in the West. This is a continuation of what happened in Muslim countries. This is explained by the fact that we are moving further and further away from the fabulous period called the nahda (often translated as rebirth), which took place in the Muslim world between the beginning of the 19th century and the mid-20th century.

The nahda is a movement of major reforms and a process of modernization which affected all areas including that of religion. Under pressure from conservatives and Islamists who knew how to take advantage of the political and geopolitical events of the time, the nahda failed.

[Patrice Ayme’s thesis is that this failure was not an accident, just as the promotion of Christianism by Roman emperors in the Fourth Century, which was a sinister plot at the highest level, starting with son killing and wife steaming Constantine.]

Conservatives and Islamists, notably the Wahhabis and Muslim Brotherhood, then mobilized to ensure that Muslim societies renounce the gains of this period of modernization, that is to say, go back to the past. , which they gradually achieved. As a result, the more the years separate us from the period of the nahda, the more conservatism and Islamism are expressed and imposed, and the more young people are more religious and conservative than their elders.

How can we fight against the radical ideas shared by young Muslims, which take shape thanks to disinformation and social networks?

The fight must take place on several levels. First of all, that of the State which must be firmer and more determined in its fight against Islamic radicalism to stop the Islamist ideology which is on the march in France. The State must find a solution to this phenomenon of indoctrination by social networks. It cannot fight against fundamentalism and Islamism and leave young people at the mercy of social networks.

It must act at school level by providing training to teachers, enabling them to have intellectual elements of defense against fundamentalist discourse among young people. I myself was a teacher in Algeria at a time when the Islamist wave was invading the country. It was only with these elements of defense that I was able to face the fundamentalism that was affecting certain students. To instill the values of humanism and critical thinking in young people, teachers must stop wanting to spare the sensitivity of Muslims, which is on the one hand discrimination and on the other hand does not help them to emancipate themselves. intellectually.

Then, we must put an end to the idea that “Islamism is not Islam”, which specialists in Islamism like to repeat since the 1970s. It has created the nest of conservatism and radicalism in sheltering Islam from any criticism. This has prevented Muslims from critically looking at their religion and religious discourse. On the contrary, this expression has reassured them in their certainties and their practices which date back to the first centuries of Islam and which are not in agreement with the values of our time and with the culture of France.

Finally, religious discourse must be honest with Muslims and non-Muslims, that is to say, we must put an end to the phrase: “It is not Islam but only Muslims” . A phrase which is itself at the origin of the academics’ phrase: “It is not Islam, but Islamism”. Muslim intellectuals or intellectuals of Muslim culture must get to work to offer Muslims a new Islam, compatible with the values of humanism and the modalities of social and political organization of our time by explaining to them why it is necessary to change and how it is possible to change. Without this work within Islam, without this reform of Islam, radicalism and Islamism will continue to advance. Whatever political measures are taken against these phenomena, they will resurface as long as Islam does not change from within.

How did supporters of political Islam in France manage to impose the concept of “Islamophobia”?

[Patrice Ayme: In many countries including supposedly religiously enlightened France, “Islamophobia”, the JUSTIFIED fear of Islam, is mistranslated into the “hate of Islam”, and viewed as a form of… racism. Whereas, in truth, any religion which threatens to kill people for innocent beliefs and practices, calling them criminal, should be feared, and as the Republican Romans did, extinguished.] 

Islamophobia is a concept that aims to prevent thoughts from being expressed. It is therefore added to the list of concepts and theories that Muslim fundamentalists and literalists put in place, between the 8th century and the 10th century, to block thought and reason and prevent them from expressing themselves. in the field of religion. Among these theories are that of the uncreated Quran, the theory of salaf (or predecessor), the theory of naql (or literalism) and among the concepts there is that which states that “religion is a matter of the heart and not of reason”. Islamophobia therefore easily finds its place in the consciousness of a large part of Muslims who think that Islam, the perfect religion of God transmitted by the predecessors who have held the absolute truth, cannot be criticized.

The Muslim Brotherhood used it in the Muslim world as a weapon against progressives who had a different narrative about the Muslim religion, and in the West to make Muslims feel like victims because criticism about their religion is issued. The idea that Islam does not admit any critical spirit is also nourished by academics, who have repeated for more than 50 years that Islam is not responsible for the problems that arise, but only Islamism which is not Islam.

We therefore reinforced this conviction which existed among a large proportion of Muslims from cultures where Islam is not criticized. For them, anyone who criticizes it has no reason to do so other than out of fear or hatred of this religion. They perceive this as an injustice towards them. Prohibiting critical thinking in the field of Islam is obviously not in the interest of Islam or Muslims.

***

***

[1]

Quran in Surah Al Ma’idah that says:

“Say, “Shall I inform you of [what is] worse than that as penalty from Allah ? [It is that of] those whom Allah has cursed and with whom He became angry and made of them apes and pigs (swine) and slaves of Taghut. Those are worse in position and further astray from the sound way.””  

Tags: Christianism, Constantine, Fanaticism, Great Bitter Lake Conspiracy, Islam, Islamism, Isphahan, Oil, slavery, Stupidification, Theodosius