Violence Breeds Violence, Until Wisdom Is Brought To Bear.



Syria, Colorado, Guns, Fanaticism, Mutilated Babies, God, Assad, Putin: A Common Thread. Greedy, Manipulative Oligarchies.


Abstract: Just a relaxing essay before another heavy duty one on thinking. A running commentary on recent events. The squeamish and easily offended are invited to go read something else.

They may not appreciate the mix of current events, explained by an overall abusive violence with far reaching subconscience… Even the plutocrat in chief of New York City, Bloomberg, agrees with me that soothing words are little, and action is needed. It is a question of replacing a wholesome order of violence by something more civilized, in other words, more advanced. Enough with deliberate mental retardation, wrapped with a smile and a prayer.

One has to learn to laugh about the unbearable, or make it otherwise interesting, all the more since it is unbearable. Only through laughter does the unbearable become bearable.

Laughter and play blossomed to make interesting skills that it is necessary to muster. Empathy is not everything. Empathy works if and only if it is connected to reason, and that implies little tolerance for weapons, outside of law enforcement, be it local, or global.

Learning to make a religion from reason means learning not to tolerate superstition, except when it is completely, absolutely and definitively innocuous. It does not matter if the religion is supposed to be honorable. Of course, the Aztec religion was most honorable, and I would have been the first to bear witness, lest my chest be cut open by those priests from hell.

Horrific is horrific. Rational lesson number one. Reason rises from emotion, and innocence from a baby’s face.

Having empathy for babies means no tolerance for sexual mutilating them. Whereas having empathy for the Middle East means socially mutilating Allah. Don’t worry about Him: He is a big boy.

Lesson therein for Syria. Retrospective lesson for the Jews: did that self mutilation they swear by, make them more tolerant of Hitler’s abuse?

Yes, philosophy is war, and its armies will not rest. Only thus can civilization can push back plutocracy down the hell hole where it belongs (Pluto is also a big boy, related to the preceding one, as scripture attests; let them have a party together, where they belong.)



Most look at sad, or tragic events around the world, and they feel negative emotions: sadness, fear, dejection, rejection. They feel the pain, and that’s great: empathy is important. However, dangers are entangled with this. One of them: becoming a parody of caring, to cover up one’s enormous corruption.

Bill Clinton’s enormous corruption does not have to be presented again. But when one sees Dr. Bernard Kouchner to be corrupt, one has to pinch oneself. Kouchner was a founder of Medecins Sans Frontieres/Doctors Without Borders, an indisputably excellent organization providing free medical care for those who otherwise would not have any, worldwide.  Kouchner was famous for having landed once in Somali with a rice bag on his shoulder, media in attendance. A decade or so later, Clinton did the same in Haiti, for his own personal glory, rice bag on the shoulder, media in attendance.

The danger is that, once it becomes clear that many “charitable” organization are, first full of charity for themselves, everybody becomes all too cynical.

Another danger is that people either become indifferent to the input, the pain of others, or learn just not to care, be it only because walloping in misery is not something the brain likes to do too much of.

Hence the true humanist will learn to laugh. Not exactly laugh of the misery of others, but laugh of, say, the logic that leads to said misery. A logic of the unsaid, a logic of moods which thrive best, when they do not have a name.



Another flurry of death: 71 shot in Colorado in a movie theater. USA citizens love to say they need guns to protect themselves. OK, true, they have to protect themselves against other USA citizens, no small feat, apparently. What USA citizens obsession with guns is telling us, is that the citizens feel that no law nor reason will bring them safety, only shooting will. So they are ready to shoot, or be shot. And they kill, at a rate 15 times that of Japan, where guns are severely outlawed.

The USA: a sad case where sadism (shooting) is brought to bear, only through the acceptance of being shot (masochism.)

Guns are not really a debate in the USA: money rules, and, as long as the gun plutocrats want people to have guns, they will. The sheep is too busy bleating, to be thinking.

In all plutocratic matters, one plutocracy can hide another. As long as USA citizens will be terrified of each other, they will not take part in big demonstrations, as people do in Europe. So the ultimate plutocrats, at the very top, are happy to have a country where the rabble shoots each other. It gives the top plutocrats a pretext and excuse to do the same, and raise the level of overall violence, and injustice, be it legal, constitutional, or not.

(Since the decision “Citizens United” of the Supreme Court Of the US, plutocrats and their organizations, are pretty much free to give as much money as they want, under cover, to anybody they chose, hence giving a chance to their rich boy Romney. But that of course is violence, legal violence much more carefully directed.)



Once there was a Japanese cannibal in Paris (supposedly a friend of Mick Jagger as related in Too Much Blood). He wanted to eat his Dutch girlfriend, so he pointed an old gun he had purchased from organized crime, to the back of her head, and pulled the trigger. The venerable equipment misfired. He tried again, a few days later, and this time the old, tired bullet kicked into action, just enough to pierce her skull and rebound all around inside her head, killing her instantly.

Morality? Sagawa was a tiny weak guy with an inferiority complex (but with a rich father who paid for top lawyers). He selected his victim for her “beauty and health“. Without the gun, he could never have killed her. Guns are enablers. It is harder to eat people, without weapons, in the sense that, before eating them, one has to capture or kill them, and man, without weapons, is pretty much not just defenseless, but rather innocuous.

Reality is stranger than fiction. Condemned to life imprisonment as criminally insane in France, the cannibal was later extradited to Japan, where he was found “sane but evil“, and released (!). He is now a successful author and artist in Japan. A media celebrity and authority on mass murders and cannibalism (even represented on TV engaged in mock cannibalism), he has suggested he may return to his culprit activities. However, he will have to find a gun first.

Second morality: In Japan (where cannibalism is not a crime, and some have advertized body parts recently, so they claimed), clearly, if cannibals have fun with women on TV, it’s not the intensity of Japanese prosecution that make criminals behave. What makes them behave, is the intensity of Japanese prevention. It’s no doubt harder to purchase a gun in Japan than in France (with millions of hunters, with big boar killing rifles, France is armed to the teeth as the Wehrmacht found out in 1941-1944).



Speaking of amputating body parts… A court in Cologne, Deutschland, found that sexual mutilations of children were… sexual mutilations of children. Wow. Civilization, tell me, how long did that take? Wrote the German Court: “The operation does serious bodily harm and only males old enough to consent to it freely should undergo it.”

Some hospitals in Switzerland, appraising the Court’s wisdom, decided to order their doctors to stop mutilating their children, just because their parents want it. Break the cycle. The philosopher will not argue here that what starts with priests dressed fancy torturing children, ends in Auschwitz. Some other time. But violence justified against the innocent is the underlying principle. (And don’t forget those who target deliberately innocent families with drones: that too erects the principle of justifying the unjustifiable, and also leads to Auschwitz; the fact it does not do so right away is immaterial to the logic.)

It is funny that Judeo-Muslims, who profess total subjugation to their furious dad-in-the-sky, the original Yahweh (YHVH), or its clone Allah (2,000 years later), have the arrogance to believe that His creation was so imperfect that He needs to be corrected with the knife every day.

Either Yahweh-Allah is great, or he is so sorely mistaken that only knife play can set Him right. Figure it out. In the meantime, calm down, and drop the weapon, before you mutilate some more, sexually, or not.



It is well know that those who were abused will abuse in turn. The propensity to violence, intellectual, or physical, is inherited. Intellectual violence is proper to man, it means creatively thinking, it’s a good thing… If we define the best of humanity as good, as we should, because that’s what we are, at our best.

Physical violence can be good, or bad, depending. But certainly teaching it to babies, and calling it love and most sacred, with religious baboons dressed fancy and acting respectable, delivering it, is exactly what civilization does not want to do.

One could actually argue that German Jews were supine, in their vast majority, and as a body politics, when Hitler rose to power, because they had lost, with a body part, the ability to be outraged. How? When the ones one respects most visit gratuitous violence on oneself, and one gets conditioned to respect this the most, when the local Hitler comes to visit violence on oneself, one also religiously accept that.

This is psychologically related to SS officer training, which involved piercing kittens’ eyes with their fingers.

The same holds for Islam, war religion, if there ever was one, but one, more generally related to making military dictatorship optimal. To be sexually mutilated early, I would respectfully suggest, make Muslim more apt to live with grotesque dictates such as the following in the Qur’an:

“Allah wants us to obey whoever detains power: “O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the messenger and obey those of you who are in power.” (Quran’s fascist principle, Sura 4, verse 59).”



Modern technology is incompatible with too much power into too few hands. This is what Obama forgets, when he plays the brainy assassin and decides who, innocent or not, he is going to have killed, worldwide.

This is also the problem with all the shootings in the USA. And it’s no accident so many shootings happen in South West Denver, Colorado (Columbine high school, Aurora, etc.) Not again! says the LA Times.  

Why not? It’s a demonstration of reason: same causes, same effects. It’s full of guns, there, differently from Manhattan, where guns are outlawed. In Colorado, if you are 15, and you want a gun, you know where to find it, starting with your parents’ bedroom: cool, man. In Manhattan, tough luck.

South West Denver is also full of police. I resided there for a while, in the richest area, Cherry Hills. Once I got stopped there, just because the officer found my face, my hair or my necklace intriguing, not fitting the call of the local wealth. The police is good at enforcing racial profiling, but race don’t kill people, guns do. Once, after shopping, having to do something else I worried: the car was full of bags in full sight. My sister in law sneered:“Don’t worry, this is Colorado! People don’t break in cars, because they know they would be shot!” In Colorado carrying one hundred fully loaded guns in a car is completely legal. If I narrated all my potentially lethal bruises with Colorado society, it would take another page.

The mayor of New York, the plutocrat billionaire Bloomberg, asked instead of the two people – President Obama and Governor Romney – talking in broad things about they want to make the world a better place, okay, tell us how…Soothing words are nice, but maybe it’s time that the two people who want to be president of the United States stand up and tell us what they are going to do about it, because this is obviously a problem across the country…I mean, there are so many murders with guns every day, it’s just got to stop…. 34 people get killed by unlawful guns, every day…This is killing people every day, and it’s growing and it’s not just an inner-city, east coast, west coast, big city phenomenon.

[Quoting a plutocrat approvingly, a proof of open mindedness!]

More than 100,000 citizens get shot with guns every year in the USA. This level of violence presumably make the average USA citizen more inclined to shoot back (starting with Iraqis and Yemenites).

It also inure the population of the USA to violence, and so it cares not what happens to the climate and biosphere. (Although the USA produces directly only 25% of the world CO2 production, it controls much more, through its worldwide plutocratic networks, as when Clinton became hysterical about the European Carbon Tax, and threatened to ally herself with Putin and other goons to do something violent about it.)



There are tipping points in global psychology: see how the Arab Spring progressed after an illegal street vendor was allegedly slapped by a police woman in Tunisia (she denies it). But it can also go the other way: after the Nazis, fueled by oil men from Texas, launched the Second World War in Spain, in 1936, one thing led to another, and violence erupted everywhere (for example plutocratic, militarized Japan invaded China, and the giant fascist USSR attacked tiny democratic Finland).

In any case, it’s impossible to tolerate arbitrary weapons and arbitrary levels of violence, if one cares about one’s survival, even if one lives on the other side of the Earth.

This is the sense of the anguish about the “Islamist republic of Iran” having nuclear weapons: Israel crammed with nukes is bad enough, we don’t need two.  (OK, I am perfidious, Iran calls itself “Islamic”, not “Islamist”… but still praying to Qur’an S4, v59.)

All the Muslim dictators, have, since the Qur’an was written down well after Muhammad’s death, used the Muslim Fascist Principle. It is the milk of dictators, and as long as Arab Spring People have not thoroughly understood this, they bark to a sand storm.

Thus, if the aim is progress, it is crucial that the regime that will succeed the rebellion in Syria be secular. Dictators including the assassin Assad, have been riding for 13 centuries Islam’s fascist principle, that all good Muslims obey all dictators. Enough. Unfortunately, what we have now in Syria is an army fighting an army. A secular, democratic minded authority is not as much behind the rebellion as it should be.

Western Europe got rid of the Middle Ages God-Is-great theocracy, truly a plutocracy masquerading as a theocracy (while still claiming to obey Roman republican law). Time for the Eastern Mediterranean to do the same.

While circumcising Allah’s work with a knife, all the time, his self proclaimed fanatics seem definitively to underestimate His capabilities. Allah can handle been thrown out of politics and society. Yet, I am sure Allah, should he exist, can take care of himself. I am a believer in Allah’s self reliance!



Some will whine that it’s not the business of the West, what the Orient does. Well the world now is smaller, much smaller, than France in 1800. From now on, all wars are civil wars, whether one likes it, or not. Damascus is in our neighborhood, not just Aurora, and the problems are related: in both cases, oligarchies have been (mis)leading people by the nose.

The Roman empire, spread for centuries, from Portugal to Iran, and Scotland to Southern Egypt. During that age, the average Roman citizen had a level of creatures’ comfort not equated until the end of the European Middle Ages, a millennium later.

The present day Middle East was the richest part of the empire, it was called its “Oriental Part“. The Islamist invasion ruined it (not right away, but in the fullness of time). Now from the Occident to the Orient of the (ex) empire, a catapult  (so to speak) can send an object in a few minutes. One world.

Relevant anecdote: Rome was founded greatly on the reign of reason and tolerance (meaning that reason tolerated what was innocent). However, Jewish fanatics rebelled against Roman order in the famous Judean war. During the siege of Jerusalem, Roman artillery bombarded the city with thousands of pig heads. 2,000 years ago, the Romans already found the Jewish fanatics ridiculous. (Now I have neighbors, and, although very nice and modern, they obsess about pigs… although they don’t even like Jews, as an ethnic group… both notions are crazy… and intimately related!)

In the end, all what the Jewish fanatics achieved, after the insane war of 70 CE, and a similar revolt later, was the dispersion of Israel. (Although the Non-Christian emperor Julian allowed again the construction of the temple in Jerusalem, shortly before his assassination (363 CE), the hostility of the Roman state to the Jews would be amplified in Christianity.)

One can compare with the situation in Gaul: the populations there were even more rebellious than the Jews. But they did not cling fanatically to their old superstition. Instead revolts tried to out-Rome the Romans, by outsmarting them with more reason, and more progress. So the Romans did not massacre and disperse Gaul (after the initial rebellions crushed by Caesar). After five centuries of ever more insistent revolts, coups, “Gallic empire”, etc. the Gallo-Romans allied with the Franks, creating the West as we know it, the official successor state of Rome.



A nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India would be, automatically, a war between fascism and democracy. Democracy would have to intervene. So democracy intervenes now. Lest some in China got fancy ideas.

And this is why the French republic is such a strong ally of India. The new French socialist government decided that, besides German and British delegates, Indians will sit on the French defense steering committee. One world, democracy elaborating future weapon systems and strategies.

Whereas the French republic frontier used to be on the Rhine, now it’s from the Falklands to Malaysia. it goes without saying that Great Britain and the USA are fully aware of this (even if Merkel aligned herself on Putin about Libya: all that gas…)



Neither Islam, nor Christianity are civilizations. Never were, never will, God willing. they are just superstitions, thinking of themselves as civilizations. They were the cover-ups military aristocracies used to claim they were exactly the opposite of what they truly were (read Nietzsche on this angle, about Chrsitianity).

Some fear that, as the West comes all out against Wahhabism (the Saudi religion often described by primitives as “Islam” by an abuse of language), a clash of civilization would ensue. However a clash between a superstition and civilization, is not a clash of civilizations. It is the clash between an elephant, and a swine.

Civilization is used to do away with primitive beliefs. The tradition was not invented yesterday. Once a Roman general, under the republic, actually a supreme commander, an imperator, charging at the head of his troops during D Day, stumbled out the surf, and fell face first on the beach. That was definitively a bad omen. And not just in the old Roman religion,

However the general laughed, grabbed the sand in both hands, and loudly exclaimed: “Africa, I hold you!”

The campaign was highly successful (the exact opposite story had happened to Athens a few centuries earlier, causing the annihilation of her fleet and army in Syracuse. Superstition can be costly!)

The story of the republican West, overall, is not that of the reign of superstition (yes, republican, in the sense that Frankish kings were elected, and that the republic never formally died under the Roman empire). In the West, the pope was always viewed as independent and separate from political power. And sometimes the relationships between both were really bad, for very long, such as when the Franks let the popes macerate with the hated Lombards (“long beards”) for 150 years.

The secret of the West is in plain sight: the triumph of intelligence and reason, (partly under the cover of crucifixion,) for more than a millennium. Intelligence and reason are best served by democracy. Crucifixion had a double meaning, of course: a reminder that the world is not about circumcising difficulties, and that, sometimes, nothing beats full frontal horror. Charlemagne let his underlings use the cross as a terror weapon.



When Christianity was useless, the Franks did not use it. So Christianity was used to spread Franco-Roman civilization, far ahead of the limes (as the Romans had done). Yet, inside the Imperium Francorum (soon to be “renovated” as the Imperium Romanum again), Christianity was not imposed anymore than Judaism, Islam, Paganism, or Charlemagne’s style polytheism.

Things degenerated into feudalism for military reasons: in the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Century, the Imperium Romanum of the Franks was simultaneously invaded by savages from the North, The South, and the East. Charles Martel’s trick of endowing the empire with a very heavy cavalry evolved into a caste of professional killers, born and raised. Charlemagne used the heavy cavalry to conquer swiftly where Romans legions had floundered, and Caesar only dreamed of.

A knight, his decades of training, his special giant, huge but swift horse, his squires, his special weapons, and heavy armor, the world’s best steel, represented a colossal spending (that no other power in the world could ever afford; Iran for a few centuries had heavy armored cavalry. but they were not a caste). Thus that European aristocracy (rule of the best) grew, propped in no small fashion by much lower, or exemption from, taxes.

All I can say is that there was a good reason for this. The Nord Men, the Avars, the Magyar, and the Sarah Sons (“Saracens“) were defeated and domesticated. However, that was mostly done by 1,000 CE. Although the reconquista had a long way to go in Italy, Greece, and Spain, in Northern Europe, the aristocracy had lost its reason for existing in the first place. But it kept going. How?

The old aristocracy, truly a plutocracy, oppressed Europe for more than a millennium, its power resting on lower tax rates than the commons, just like it is the case now.

In the USA the tax rates paid by the hyper rich are incredibly low, and many are actually able to pay none at all (with many tricks, such as borrowing against shares). All other industries pay tax, when a transaction happens, it’s only normal that the Lords of Finance would pay one too. The reasoning why they should not are well known: they were held to justify the prerogatives of the so called “nobles”, the plutocrats, for more than a millennium.

However the French republic just passed a financial transaction tax. It becomes effective August 1, 2012.

Plutocracy is an emerging property. Out the many, and the much, comes out something completely different. The financial plutocracy, we learned in recent weeks, is committing fraud on a scale never seen before. From money laundering drug money for murderous Mexican drug mafias, Jihadists or Iranian Islamists, to cheating on 350 trillion dollars of deposits (yes, 350, 000 billions).

My bombing runs over theocracy do not imply that there was never something grand and right about past religions. If nothing else the violence in Christianism and Islamism are unequalled. Therein their utility to the military aristocracies plutocracies. Jokes aside, the civilizational aspects connected to Judeo-Christo-Islamism can be the most inspiring as works of man: just visit stupendous Isfahan. It will nearly turn you Shiah for a day. Certainly Shah Abbas, who built Isfahan into a magnificent capital, did more architecturally than even the so called “Sun King” of France (besides Abbas was even worse of a superstitious fanatic: he had the Georgian queen Kelevan tortured to death for eight years to force her to become a Muslim).

And it’s not just savasges from the desert in a past far away. In Russia three girls are threatened with seven years in jail for singing an anti-Putin prayer in a cathedral. A smart white Russian came onTV, and declared that, in an Islamist country, their heads would have already been cut. So why can Christians do the same? After Assad, may be the West should do Putin?  

The past justifications for fanatical variations on the Jewish god have become obsolete and counter effective. Civilization, ever more formidable, has moved on. Civilization, even more than the Devil, is in the mental details, not just in the grand flow of transgalactic intelligence with its transluminal vision.

Plutocracy is to civilization what cancer is to individuals. It proliferates, becomes metastatic, and corrupts all tissues (for example religion in the Islamist area) . It’s a real war: just watch what is going on with Syrian plutocracy. A regime of patented assassins, conspiratorially connected to the best Western banks, is not just fighting Jihadists, but also thousands of warriors for democracy and liberty. The dictatorships in China and the USSR Russia have seen the danger, and feel the empathy.

The plutocratic phenomenon has ruined many a civilization, now it’s ravaging ours. Nothing really new. Same old, same old. History teaches how to fix it: don’t hesitate to go to war, and chose your targets well. And, yes, it is first a philosophical war.


Patrice Ayme

Tags: , , , , , ,

14 Responses to “Violence Breeds Violence, Until Wisdom Is Brought To Bear.”

  1. Paul Handover Says:

    Still letting your words and feelings penetrate by own consciousness.

    But reported today on the BBC News website is this:

    A global super-rich elite had at least $21 trillion (£13tn) hidden in secret tax havens by the end of 2010, according to a major study.

    The figure is equivalent to the size of the US and Japanese economies combined.

    The Price of Offshore Revisited was written by James Henry, a former chief economist at the consultancy McKinsey, and commissioned by the Tax Justice Network.

    He said $21tn is a conservative figure and the true scale could be $32tn.

    I’m pondering an essay on LfD but the URL of the BBC item is here


    • Old Geezer Says:

      David Cay Johnson (former NYT reporter) said today on Ian Masters’ program that the Cayman Islands were a threat to the security of the US because they deprive the government of the tax money it would be otherwise paid.


      • Patrice Ayme Says:

        Dear OGP: my opinion is that the 50 or so tax heavens that are independent countries (including Luxembourg, or Liechstenstein) should be declared enemies of France, the UK and the USA. Then they should be given an ultimatum: surrender to our tax inspectors, or face military action.
        OK, Hitler got 48 hours. Give them 72 hours.

        Germany would, I am sure join, we could put them in charge of threatening Switzerland, something they already know how to do. In the meantime, warrants of arrest should be launched against all those who cheat. Just in the canton of Valais, Suisse, there are 1,371 (many of them French).

        Seriously. Just one attack nuclear submarine can lock up an entire sea. France, the UK and the USA have dozens. They are very expensive weapons. Very silent too. Time to put them to good use. Let’s see how the Cayman Islands do, under total sea, air embargo.


      • Old Geezer Says:

        You are thinking the right thoughts, PA. If you take Henry’s figure of $21 TRILLION, even a 15% Romney tax on this is $3 TRILLION that the western nations LOST.

        Hell, that covers our so-called deficit 3 times over.

        It amazes me that after getting the Bush tax cuts, the super rich want to evade even that.

        Yes. 72 hour notice. Then we take over.


        • Patrice Ayme Says:

          Dear OGP: the funny thing is that the present crisis is 100% identical to that of France before the Revolution of 1789. Ever since he became king at 21, Louis XVI tried to get the plutocrats to pay taxes, but they fought back very nastily (a very long story).

          France, at the time, was the superpower. Her resources were enormous, but greatly untapped. France refused to use financial leverage to the extent the UK did (but still came undone from her debt on the global financial markets!) Social peace was maintained greatly because french peasants were owners. However, the aristocrats and company, the plutocrats, in one word, paid much less, and sometimes no taxes at all. The tricks used were similar to those used today by global corporations, or individuals such as Larry Elison (borrowing instead of cashing out).

          Louis XVI made the situation worse by launching the independance war of the American Colony (he started with special, undercover agents in Philadelphia, the capital of the future USA then!). Of course that ended up by augmenting the deficit gigantically (at least by 5 trillion of today’s dollars).
          Funny thing is that his grand father Louis XV ill advised by (the all too philosophical, and pro-plutocratic) Voltaire, did not spend much money fighting back Britain in the Seven Year (world war). And so lost it, and lost Canada. Meanwhile, leveraging itself to the hilt, three times smaller Britain spent all the money it did not have….

          So Louis XVI tried and tried, always coming short of using violence against his own family as he should have… He lost his head, but he was the Revolutionary Numero Uno (I would have screamed if somebody had told me that ten years ago, but I was ill informed…)

          Irony is that Louis’ brother, who had put in his study the famous painting of the execution of the English king Charles I, later became king himself, and reigned under the tricolor (before being thrown out by the People)

          What is happening is that, when a gang of individuals has committed crimes, they commit even more, to escape justice. The world plutocracy is betting their house in their grab for a new feudal order.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I was planning an essay (part written) about Luxembourg. Basically, Luxembourg should be shut down. Just convert it into a Foreign Legion training camp. Or maybe a place where the legionaires would come and relax with the native women.

      By the way, The Financial Times and The Economist have their directors there, in Luxembourg, on a second floor of a mangy building with no elevator, and behind a five dollar door. With another 19 companies. Same door.

      One is talking about billions of taxes unpaid, to the UK alone, every week, to the tax heavens… (I think it’s at least 40 billion dollars a year, at least, that Luxembourg STEALS from Great Britain ALONE, each year. I have to check the numbers)

      And then one tells us the Greeks have to go without medical treatments, and the Spaniards have to go without jobs, and taxes ought to be raised on the middle class, everywhere? While services are cut, and trillions are sent to the financial thugs who organize the whole thing?

      I observe that Luxembourg has no industry, and still is the richest country. Should theft be honored as the most valuable industry? That is why I suggest that Luxembourg converts to providing what the glorious Japanese imperial army used to call “comfort women“. What else could they do? If they knew how to do something else, they would stop stealing people, no?
      Especially when everybody can see it.



  2. pshakkottai Says:

    Re: “Plutocracy is an emerging property. Out the many, and the much, comes out something completely different.”
    In the USA its appearance has been rather sudden but you have talked about Rome which was brought down by plutocracy. It appears to rise again and again.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear Pshakkottai:
      The apparition of plutocracy in the USA is brutal, as far as the masses are concerned. But that was just because they were not interested by reality. Hitler was, as much a product of American PLUTOcracy (with a capital Pluto) as of German racial fascism. For example, without American plutocratic suppoert, including oil from TEXACO, his forces (thus Mussolini’s and franco’s) could never have conquered Spain. I explained in the past that JP Morgan (the man who created the bank, richest in the USA in 1907) was the force behind Dr. H. Schacht, himself perhaps hitler’s most important enablers…

      It was momentarily suppressed during and after WWII from the People’s war (and reimbursing the debt by heavy taxes on the wealthiest).

      Plutocracy is a phenomenon. It’s tied to the nature of civilization (the many), and of interest (which grows exponentially, whether it’s a percentage of a lent sum of money, or the percentage of something else). Most civilization have failed because of an uncontrollable Plutocratic chain reaction. It is made worse by the fascist instinct (which is why the USA citizens refused to recognize the rise of plutocracy in their midst, for so long…)


  3. EugenR Says:

    Enough with deliberate mental retardation, wrapped with a smile and a prayer.
    Enough of culture of fake consumerism, fake brand-isms fake sodas, fake hamburgers, fake jewels, fake tits, fake bankers, fake managers, fake…fake…fake, and all this in the name of the greatest GOD of all, the fake “economic growth”


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear Eugen: Yes, certainly fake economic growth. I would be curious to see how USA GDP would look like, once energy inefficiencies (such as traffic jams) and the formidable incarceration industry, plus medical inefficiencies, CEO theft, financial piracy, etc, are removed. I could easily do the calculation, a first order one, myself. My guess is that 20% of GDP fades away.
      Ever since that young doctor explained to me how to get rich for little work, when one is an MD, a specialist…
      1% of the population holds more than 50% of the wealth in the USA. In France’s Ancient Regime 9pre-1789), the aristocracy was 2% of the population… And then of course there was the Church, and the Law… So wealth was actually MORE spread about…


  4. Old Geezer Says:

    GDP (then GNP) was invented during WWII, to measure the relative efficiencies of war material manufacturers at the request of the War Department. The economist who invented it warned NEVER to use it as a general econometric during peacetime.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dear OGP: Very interesting, I did not know this. Much of the economic data is all manipulated. For example, there is a GDP deflator, the sanctity of which is taken for granted, just as the “hedonistic adjustment” to the CPI… especially minus “food and energy” (only the poor worry about those!)

      The switch from GNP to GDP is probably far from innocent. Differently from similar countries (say UK or Germany), the French GNP is 10% higher than the French GDP. That would seem to indicate that French businesses operate more overseas than their colleagues… Or some measurements are systematically tweaked, or…

      What is sure is that the tax cheating by plutocratic corporations is just astounding, and made possible by the false propaganda of politicians. Worlwide politicians say:”We cannot tax the rich, because they would go somewhere else!” This neglects the fact that more than 98% of the world’s military capability (outside of the Russian and Chinese dictatorships) is in the hands of France, Britain and the USA, three large democracies starved for funds, while at the core of the worldwide plutocratic network. So it’s easy to use force. Actually it would not come to that. Law enforcement in the West is extensive, and if warrants of arrests were issued for 100,000 ring leaders, they could be easily rnforced with the existing Interpol, etc.
      If one can arrest Bosnian-Serb war criminals in Serbia, one can arrest whoever, wherever.

      But what is absent is not just the will to do, but the will to inquire about what is going on. why is the New York Times not fascinated by the Financial Times’ directors being located behind a decrepit door in a cheap non descript building in Luxembourg? Too close to home? Why does the Economist call Hollande a “rather dangerous man” when their own unknown directors are behind that same door, like rats munching on cheese in the dark?


  5. Old Geezer Says:

    Aside from being a poor indicator from the start, GDP has been continuously fiddled into a meaningless number. To wit, the GDP proves that there is no inflation. So how come I need more and more cash to buy the same stuff?

    It’s a mystery.

    A little research showed I was a little off on the year.

    “…GDP was first developed by Simon Kuznets for a US Congress report in 1934,[4] who immediately said not to use it as a measure for welfare (see below under limitations). After the Bretton Woods conference in 1944, GDP became the main tool for measuring the country’s economy.[5]…”

    from wikipedia:


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Bretton Woods is also where the dollar was made the world reserve currency, in spite of the opposition of keynes (who headed the currency commission). Finally a false doc was presented for signing, unbeknownst to Keynes.
      Curiously Krugman keeps on forgetting these inconvenient points when he asks Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal and other ex American military pet shops to drop the euro… In his daily prayer…


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: