President Obalande?

One of the best evolution for civilization would be for France and the USA to get ever closer. France, hence Europe, as the latter is the latest ruse for an amplification of the former.

Well, and that’s very good, Barack Obama, differently from his dumb predecessors since the clever Kennedy (“Ich bin ein Berliner”… das ist, ich bin französisch…) has understood that France and the USA ought to be as close as possible.

After all, with a France-USA union of minds, there would have been no Iraq war, no Afghanistan war (Carter’s war against Afghanistan of 1979 was oriented against France, not just the USSR), no Hitler (FDR would have obeyed France in 1934, and cracked down against the Anglo-Saxon supports of Hitler), and no First World War (because, with the early and immediate help of the USA, either the Kaiser would not have attacked, or been quickly defeated by blockade).

The enlightened Obama (not to be confused with the drone rabid version) is turning things around. I saw the French president this week, in San Francisco’s Silicon Valley, of all places. I will relate the two things that astounded me most.

But first a bit of background:

The war between France and other colonists of the Americas, has been one of the longest: it is well in its fifth century. With Spain it was won, long ago: the Spanish king, more than three centuries ago, chose a Bourbon to succeed him (that started the world War of the Spanish Succession, and Louis XIV won it only by losing pieces of France… never recovered since.)

A generation earlier, after more than a century of war, the French army, having insured the creation and independence of the Netherlands (itself an 80 year long war) against fascist theocratic Spain, had defeated the (so far undefeated) “Spanish Squares”.

As I explained in the preceding essay, Jefferson, although a Francophile, was himself a philosophical battleground between the Liberty-Equality-Fraternity notion, the most human notion, and the Exploitative Principle, part of the Dark Side (which is to grab all what one can grab; recent experimental studies in human ethology have shown that the EP is extremely contagious.)

In all these conflicts, it’s all a matter of relative positions. France was more for Liberty-Equality-Fraternity, because that’s how the Franks established the successor regime of the pure Roman (-Catholic) state.

Spain was reconquered from a difference mentality, that of intolerance and revenge: the Reconquista. It applied not just to Muslims, but, less excusably, to Jews. At the same time some Jihad characteristics, such as Holy War, torture and slavery were kept as if they were precious gifts. Hence the clash with France (all the more as imperial Spain, having conquered all of Europe but for tiny England and large France, fed, as much as possible, seven religious civil wars in France, in the period 1550-1600 CE!)

So wars, contrarily to what clueless and lazy pacifists affect to believe, do not just arise from the badness of human nature, or making too many knives, but, all too often, deep down inside, wars arise from, and reflect, genuine philosophical differences… That can be settled only by war: think of the conflict between tiny Athens and the fascist plutocratic imperial Persian hyperpower.

Such wars, if the best philosophical side win, contribute positively to civilization.

The war of Athens against Persia was fundamentally a conflict between direct democracy and representative plutocracy (the Persian empire was an empire of nations).

So there I was. Listening to Hollande, the French Resident of the Élysée, in the San Francisco Bay Area.

My first astonishment was that all he said part of my own program. There was absolutely nothing I disagreed with. (That, of course, does not mean that Hollande’s vast world vision reduces to my much more cosmic grasp. Far from it!)

I had no disagreement with what he said, whatsoever, from Ukraine, to Syria, to using English (= Anglo-Normand, as I put it) in French education, to duplicating the successful techno-industrial-financial recipes of Silicon Valley (including “corporate venturing”, when a giant corporation, such as Cisco, Google or Microsoft  invest in start-ups).

I was pleasantly surprised when the French president, a socialist, breezingly stated that the making of what I call the Transatlantic Economic Area between the USA and the EU ought to be accelerated.

On this later point Hollande said the forces of opposition to the USA-EU union ought to be given no time to organize.

I believe that Obama desires to leave a more positive legacy than the two Bushes. He still has a chance: he can heavily reform Obamacare towards Medicare For All, he can find ways to decrease the greenhouse emissions of the USA (using the EPA)… and China (though customs threats), and he can cooperate with Europe.

A Transatlantic Economic Area would be a good occasion to ram positive reforms on both sides of the Atlantic, by arguing one has to duplicate the best, and throw away the bad, on each side of the pond.

A small example: In exchange for the anticipation of juicier profits, from a larger (USA-EU) market, Republicans may be willing to concede that poisoning Monarch Butterflies and bees is something that we could do without.

That union of unions would require that the cultural exception survives (lest the USA, or rather its army of Hollywood and its phalanx of plutocratic corporations, swallow everything). As Hollande pointed out, the cultural exception is not just about France.

Indeed France is big enough demographically and civilizationally to survive culturally… but not so most others (and that is basically nearly all other European countries; once one removes the six most populous countries of the EU; the average demographic size of the remainder is less than ten million, each of them a nation, with its own culture, history and civilization.)

The Transatlantic Economic Area (TEA) ought to go all the way to a free circulation of individuals and professions (extend Schengen!). Not to do so makes no sense, at least no sense between France (thus Germany!) and the USA.

What is the meaning of all this?

As I have explained countless times, France and the USA are two SISTER republics, THE sister republics. Those sister republics were born entangled together in 1789. Try as it may, the UK is not yet a republic. Try as he could, Bliar Blair left us with a Chamber of Lords.

Hollande reminded everybody in sight what I say all the time, namely that the United Nation Charter is a direct amplification of the 1789 Franco-American constitutional adventure (yes, France first, because the Franks’ Freedom obsession is from 17 centuries back).

The second thing that astonished me was the extravagant security. Secret Services, US Marshalls, local police and even “Federal Reserve Police “, with dogs, were there. And then there was French security. No less than 20 French Secret Service bodyguards were in full evidence around Hollande, but more were hidden as regular attendees (male and female). Twice apparent civilians showed me a badge discreetly and asked me to stop taking pictures of… security personel.

Most telling was the smart French military officer, complete with peaked white cap and cute gold ribbons. He was carrying the thick black computer case with the nuclear codes.

Imagine the French president ordering nuclear strikes from the Silicon Valley.

Well, this is actually a good sign. If America and France cooperate, it’s back to what it was 450 years ago, and where it ought to have always be.

Neither uncommon thoughts, nor uncommon individuals, arise from common situations. Fully integrating the American and European civilizations will bring us out of what has been all too common for centuries. From this higher point of view, greater conceptions will blossom.

Patrice Aymé

Note: What of Britain in all this? Well, it’s a psychiatric case. PM Cameron wants to ask the Brits if they want to part of the EU in a referendum. This shows that Britain is falling back in mental childhood. Not a serious partner. Proof? Well, Britain is experiencing the wettest winter in 250 years. What to do? Well, use the Princes (Harry Hairy, etc.), the army, but also, ask the European Union for a 200 million dollar emergency help…

Tags: , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “President Obalande?”

  1. Alexi Helligar Says:

    “Neither uncommon thoughts, nor uncommon individuals, arise from common situations.”

    Alexi Helligar Not sure about this one, Patrice. Ordinariness a question of perception. Ordinary moments necessarily give birth to the extraordinary


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      That was also an implicit answer to some people who were complaining about being unable to meet with me. Well, I met with Hollande… Assuredly not exactly a common person in one sense at least.


  2. Gena Dix Says:

    Finding beauty in the common everyday ordinary is living and its all we have


  3. Alexi Helligar Says:

    Patrice, the encounter of the USA with France can only assist the USA in becoming more civilized.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      “The encounter of the USA with France can only assist the USA in becoming more civilized.” Indeed. That’s why I am all for what I call the Transatlantic Economic Area, complete with the full travel and employment capability of people and services.

      How we will prevent half the USA to move to France will be solved by moving France’s mentality to the USA, its natural place.


  4. Alexi Helligar Says:

    I still find to be dubious your saying regarding the rise of the uncommon only from the uncommon.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      “I was able to see further because I rose from the shoulders of giants…” (Isaac Newton, having reconsidering his more youthful and naïve opinions to the contrary). I did not say “only” by the way. Even the most elevated among us have something of the commons feeding our roots. At the limit, like Oprah Winfrey, we all rose from the primordial ooze…

      Sorry about the Opera crack, I just couldn’t resist, she excites me like the juicy opulent cow excites the lioness.

      BTW, Nietzsche probably said worse than the uncommon being a breed of happenstance. He probably wrote something like only pain can bring forth birth of the great, etc etc…


  5. Dominique Deux Says:

    Soaring vision, as usual.

    A TEA1 is like Aesop’s tongue – it can be the best recipe (as in your mouth-watering menu) or the worst one. I’m all for making the former happen, but it means never forgetting about the latter’s potential.

    Opening Europe to the skewed, lying, thieving, insider-friendly rat race that US megacorps dare call “free competition” would have us awash in cheap noxious GMOs (drowning the useful ones in the sludge), antibiotics-rich ground beef and bleach-soaked cardboard poultry.

    It should be the other way around – a common economic area should allow Americans to enjoy again the “normal” foodstuffs they’ve been deprived of (except in walled communities), by gaining back some ground on their corporate predators/parasites. (I hope a TEA would not entail Europe’s acceptance of the monstrosity that is corporate citizenship!)


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Thanks for the compliment, dear Dominique. As usual, it’s most appreciated.

      As it is “the skewed, lying, thieving, insider-friendly rat race that US megacorps dare call “free competition” would have us awash in cheap noxious GMOs (drowning the useful ones in the sludge), antibiotics-rich ground beef and bleach-soaked cardboard poultry”. are in power, through globalization.

      For example corporation like Cargill dominate Brazil’s soy production. Said monstrously engineered and destructive soy then heads to Europe. What is Europe to do? Fight Brazil? Impose regulations here, regulations there? Then Brazil buys a Swedish(-American) fighter-bomber, instead of the Rafale. As happened.

      Vaguely resisting is akin to fighting a king cobra by the tail.

      I propose to fight the king cobra by the head.

      Even in walled communities one has to buy the same grossly engineered tomatoes (even the tiny Romas from Mexico are now engineered, I just discovered by eating some… they were not engineered even a few months ago).

      The EU has an enormous administration which is much less corrupt than the beleaguered one in the USA. The former can help the latter, especially if the change is fast paced. Most law is regulatory law. In the USA, the rise of plutocracy has been mostly effected by short-circuiting and outpacing regulatory law (thanks to corrupt executive administrations). A TEA (Transatlantic Economic Area) would reestablish the dominance of law, and the right wing could be bought as I said.

      Take antibiotics in meat: European regulations would keep on applying (because of these non anti biotic food is gaining in the USA, year after year, already.)

      In my experience, the stronger culture wins… As long as the devious, underhanded ways of money (Pluto, underground) are mastered. First basically all European food production is already protected by “Controlled Denominations” (appellations controlees).

      As Hollande said, we have a tax haven problem, even inside Europe…. And Europeans have been unable to fix it. Now Obama has been cracking down fiercely on Switzerland. We can suggest his… help to address, say, the IRISH problem. Or the Luxembourg, or Lichtenstein problem… Or the British Virgin Islands problem…


  6. Dominique Deux Says:

    Thank you for the detailed response, with much that I approve of, in principle (especially about NOT vaguely resisting).

    But the devil keeps his foothold in the details. For example you are right that nobody proposes that EU regs on antibiotics should be scraped. But if similar (and in fact stronger) ones are not implemented on both sides of the ocean, the huge competitive advantage stemming from antibiotics use will drive European livestock producers to financial or moral ruin (as they join the already thriving vet med mafia). The good guys on both shores have to be helped by the law, not thrown naked to the lions.

    I know you agree. But any mention of a TEA or similar good-in-principle development should always fully state whit is, to us, obvious.


    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      Dominique: I have a sort of answer that is going to come as an essay later today.

      As it is, right now, the worm is already in the fruit. The EC is rotten (Otto Rehn, the economic commissioner, for example, is a right wing nut Chicago Boy. Even Krugman agrees on this one.) The incoming constitutional change (election of the EC) may alleviate that.

      Independently of the EC, it’s the business of the Europeans to democratize Europe. That would be, and is, independent of a TEA drive. Have TEA, OK, but then get to the serious democratization business. Simple: copy Switzerland. In first order.

      Make no mistake: as it is, France is a not-so-mini USA. As I met with president Hollande, I was struck by that. It’s also a fully functioning, fascist, imperial system. Not that there is really a choice at this point.

      However, take for example dying bees from insecticides, & herbicides: what is France/EU doing about it? True, GMO modified plants that resist to the preceding poisons, allowing to use even more thereof, are a further problem (and a killer of monarch butterflies in California, through the indirect destruction of milkweed, a Monarch preferred food…)

      The TEA will be what the European People want it to be, as long as they wake up and protest just so, on the pertinent issues (for example not barring all and any GMOs, but just those we have plausible scientific guesses that they would be dangerous.)


What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: