Entropy & Quantum: The Relativity of States

Entropy (usual symbol S) measures the number of specific ways in which a thermodynamic system may be arranged. It measures the number of states. It is understood as a measure of disorder.

Another part of physics which worries about states is Quantum Physics. A Quantum Process is associated to a Quantum Space which turns out to be a Hilbert Space (a complete complex vector space with a metric; basically the nices, simplest high dimensional complex vector space one can conceive of). The measurement is identified with an operator (say A) in said space, which has eigenspaces and eigenvalues (Av = av; where v is a vector called an eigenvector, and a, a complex number, the eigenvalue).

Forget Cats. In Which States Is The World Really In?

Forget Cats. In Which States Is The World Really In?

[Haroche, from the ENS lab in Paris which invented optical pumping, thus the laser, 62 years ago, and Wineland, from Boulder, got the Nobel in 2012.]

Both Entropy and the Quantum suffer of the same problem, namely: what is a state? Can state be absolutely defined?

As it is, things have been all too relative.

This is exemplified in Quantum Physics with the Schrodinger Cat Paradox. A cat is put in a box, with an infernal Quantum mechanism that is supposed to gas it (shortly after, the Nazis did for real… Interesting Freudian slip that German and Austrian physicists were involved with the idea of mixtures of dead and live cats).

The question is whether mixing live and dead cat waves is a full description of the system. It obviously stretches credulity. This was the argument of Schrodinger (initiated in exchanges with Einstein).

From the point of view of the cat, inside the box, the waves, states, and chosen Quantum spaces would be quite different

My wished-for-solution?

Apply an order on Hilbert spaces, according to fullness of description, and consider only ultrafilters (in the topological sense) as genuinely representative of the best approximation of reality. Hey, nobody said we should not think big… Anyway, that’s my answer to the Multiverse and its multiversists.

Now back to entropy.

As it exists, thermodynamics is about particles. Thus, it infeodated to the problem of states in Quantum Physics. Hence solving the Quantum Cat problem solves the problem of Entropy.

Or does it?

The deepest problem subjacent to Quantum Physics is whether some sort of thermodynamics could be, and thus should be, applied to the isolated particle (I believe it could, and should).

The Haroche and Wineland methods, above, are a step in the right direction, namely measuring what the real states, the ultimate element of reality of the world, are.

So is Entropy useless? Is it physics? Yes, it is physics, just like computer science is science. Both are emergent aspects of the world. Not as fundamental as a future sub-Quantum Physics, but all the fundamentalism, and no more, that we need, much of the time.

Patrice Ayme’

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Entropy & Quantum: The Relativity of States”

  1. ianmillerblog Says:

    In my interpretation of quantum mechanics, there is a real wave (following de Broglie) and since psi = Aexp(2πiS/h), from Euler it is not ALWAYS complex, but rather twice a period it becomes real, and rightly or wronglyI assert that is why action is quantised. If we go along with that, then any quantum wave can be factored provided all components have quantised action. If so, there is no cat paradox. We may not know whether it is alive or dead, but it is either one or the other.

    Also, suppose you revert to the classical definition of entropy, i.e. leaving aside the differentials, S = q/T, q heat, and T temperature. Heat is, of course, random kinetic energy, in which case I see a problem with a single particle – is its motion random, or is it due to an applied force? There is uncertainty, within a quantum of action, with its motion in the sense of finding its position or defining its instantaneous momentum, nevertheless outside that limit and over sufficient time, its motion is more or less deterministic. If a particle goes through a defined slit, it ends up in a specified band on a detector.

    • Patrice Ayme Says:

      I did not understand why to say that a complex number is an (ordered) pair of real numbers made the cat live-dead condition disappear…

      Me, myself and I, I disappear it by just pointing out dead-live cats are not an ULTIMATE description of Quantum reality (NEW notion, being ULTIMATE). Although Quantum, to some extent, it’s an EMERGENT description, like thermodynamics. Actually this is getting to be studied, because very practical. I forgot the name. Systems can be more or less quantic. “Decoherence” can be more or less measured…

      The problem is not that the particle tends to end on a slit, but WHY. Did some (hidden) environment, or even better, NON-LOCAL environment play a role? I would tend to believe saw, as I always want a cause to all effects… But that’s just me…
      PA

  2. The Quantum Puzzle | Patrice Ayme's Thoughts Says:

    […] Haroche is a French physicist who got the Nobel Prize for figuring out how to count photons without seeing them. It’s the most delicate Quantum Non-Demolition (QND) method I have heard of. It involved making […]

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: