Abstract: Human technology drove human genetics! Indeed, a recent scientific discovery shows that genetics can change at the rate of ecology. If one gives it some thought, that was a necessary meta-adaptation which life had to evolve, as it presented much advantage. And this is now demonstrated, at least in flies.
But why would it be different in humans? The underlying physics, biology and evolutionary pressures are the same. However, technology modifies human ecology. Homo Technologicus is 3 million years old, influencing our ecology. This is probably why humans changed so much in the last three milion years, in a virtuous spiral of a rising genetico-technological spiral! The genetico-technological singularity started millions of years ago. The consequences of this perspective to all aspects of what we call humanity are enormous.
***
Everywhere We Look, Technology:
Not even poetry would exist, without technology. This is why only humans have poetry: because only humans have technology. Wherever we look, we humans see and are surrounded by technology, and have been for three million years, 150,000 generations… Plenty of time to co-evolve: technologies are us… Our big brains may be our first technology… the fruit of our technological efforts! Let me explain…
Stones, cut and pointed to be sharp, cutting, penetrating or smashing… is technology. Our ancestors elaborated them before our brains grew at a rate proportional to their capabilities… Clothing is technology: no temperate area would have been colonized without clothing (and Africa was not excluded as genes went back and forth between Asia and Africa, for two million years, with Homo Ergaster!) Fire and cooking are technologies (Neanderthals cooked vegetables). Without fire, the megafauna would have been difficult to keep away from increasingly precise and subtle, but then weak and delicious humans… humans who could become ever more brainy and less brawny, as technology protected and leveraged them… ever more.
***
GENETICS CAN GO AT THE SPEED OF ECOLOGY:
Recent studies have shown that genetic, inheritable variability in response to the environment can happen within three or four generations… ….”evolution is acting so fast that ecology and evolution are operating at the same timescale.” This is not surprising, as, naturally and frequently, the ecology can evolve very fast and then durably: contemplate the three Dryas episodes, when Europe fell back into glacial ages, all of a sudden, in a few years, and stayed there for a millennium, or more (the causes of the Dryas are still partly mysterious).
An exponential rate of growth grows proportionally to itself. Now humans have long created their own ecology… Thus humans learned to exponentiate themselves… through technology. Maybe humans didn’t learn it culturally as much as genetically, but, as a species, they learned. That makes humans in some sense, if not masters, at least the cause, of their own evolution… And there always has been a genetic advantage to accelerate human genetico-technological evolution: contemplate the war in Ukraine, where drones are dominating the battlefield.
***
Dogs play, but they can’t do poetry: they don’t have the technology to record, nor the capabilities to make a recording: no hands, not much of a subtle voice.
My dog can vocalize grunts meaning yes, and others meaning no, and he is very good at pointing toward what he wants, or using body language, like walking away, after I make a suggestion he does not appreciate, or squealing enthusiastically after I bring food from the store. It seems that only humans can transmit culture without being physically present (wolves howling and lions roaring are the most primitive culture, through warnings…).
***
Bergson evoked “Homo Faber” The Homo who fabricates, to label us. But that’s not specific enough, we are more special than that. Lots of animals make and use tools. For example humpback whales use bubble cages to herd fish, and some crow species can devise extracting tools (as do chimps). Dogs would use tools, too if they had hands. These claws frustrate my dog so much.
Humans have been using tools and weapons which they fabricated, for millions of years. And then fire was mastered, maybe 1.5 million years ago (say Chinese archeologists).
***
Technology is science and vice versa:
Technology is too important a concept to be left as the exclusive province of the elite, billionaires and other plutocrats. Technology took part in the creation of our species.
Technology is everywhere, and has been, for millions of years, to the point it helped evolve the human species. Books, clothing, weapons and pots are technology (of “hardware” type). Writing, speaking, fire making, sculpting, botany, ethology is technology (of software type). Techno-logy: Specialized discourse…. All of culture is actually technology. Making fire in a wet forest with just sticks is technology (and one modern people don’t know).
Science and knowledge, in this general sense, have much in common with technology. (If one knows one is hungry, or in love, or afraid, that’s not technological, right; but Quantum Physics can be viewed as technology, or engineering, as it’s a method, or more generally an art to make predictions of fundamental processes in some spaces; in general Qunatum Physics can’t make precise predictions, the problems are just too complex, one can solve completely only a couple of them, and the physics community hopes that Quantum Computers will help with Quantum Physics!)
***
Etymology Of Technology: the fabrication of discourses:
“Technology” is the Latinized form of Greek tekhnologia “systematic treatment of an art, craft, or technique,” originally referring to grammar, from tekhno-, combining form of tekhnē “art, skill, craft in work; method, system, an art, a system or method of making or doing,” from PIE *teks-na- “craft” (of weaving or fabricating), from suffixed form of root *teks- “to weave,” also “to fabricate.”
Logy: Medieval Latin -logia, French -logie, and Logy: directly from Greek -logia, from -log-, combining form of legein “to speak, tell;” thus, “the character or deportment of one who speaks or treats of (a certain subject);” from PIE root *leg- (1) “to collect, gather,” with derivatives meaning “to speak (to ‘pick out words’).”
***
What is the point of being technology aware? Understanding our world enough not to be enslaved by it. As AI becomes ever more important, it’s crucial to realize it’s not magic from a world of sorcerers and witches. Because, should we adopt the point of view of tech as magic, pretty soon we will be dominated by demons [1], and ruled by the likes of Harry Potter and other witches.
Technology made us genetically, so pondering technology is pondering what made us, our creator. Differently from Aztec gods, we can get to know that creator. While the prospects of war everywhere keep on going up, many have wondered what the roots of morality were. If the preceding is true, and it is, or close to it, our morality can’t be separated from our genetics and our technology.
The connection between ourselves and tech are as old as ourselves: transhumanism is what we do, and have been doing for millions of years. By the way, this answers the burning question of why there was a serpent in the garden of Eden… Technology was not created in the first place to smell the roses… But to master the flesh, and not just the flesh of apples… The will, the will to power, is also the will to technological power, and the power of the exponential. The exponential species, indeed!
Patrice Ayme
No tech, no art! A beautiful painting or music is not just a bunch of forms, but also technology in action. Only technology enables us to appreciate the beauty of the ocean in full. Up to a very recent time, seeing such a beautiful nonlinear wave action, could not have been poetically appreciated, because we would have been submerged, with the prospect of imminent death… technology makes even aesthetic appreciation possible:
[1] Life, increasingly enormously complicated self-replicating carbon based chemistry, appeared on Earth more than four billion years ago. Life is immoral, because morality assumes consciously embracing self-replicating ways… Something life couldn’t do without consciousness… and consciousness required brains, which evolved in the last half a billion years… However, to self-replicate, the essence of morality, humans need to embrace tech… as they co-evolved with it.
***
P/S 1: Famous philosophers have talked about tech, even before Heraclitus and Democritus (to whom Aristotle refer). Nazi Heidegger, a frequent reference among the pedants, was thoroughly confused (he stupidly thought technology started 2 centuries after math!) and hopelessly shallow, sploshing through his own turd… I mention Heidegger because Nazis-in-denial always mention Heidegger…
P/S 2: It goes without saying that the approach above is new, and radical…